February 11, 2007, 12:59 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
|
Old Winchester
Our local shop has an original Winchester Model 1892 for sale. The condition of the gun is great. The action is tight and the bore looks pristine. I looked up his price in my Blue Book and it is very fair.
The rifle is chambered for the .25-20. If I buy it, it will be my first real "investment" gun. I have a question about this firearm. If I buy it, would shooting it diminish its value in any way? Or are these old rifles best left in a safe? I would appreciate any and all information you can give me about this gun. |
February 11, 2007, 01:41 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
Winchester 1892 is a strong sound rifle of Browning design. I shoot my .44-40 routinely at SASS. Unless it is just absolutely pristine and worth big bucks as a showpiece, you will not hurt its value by shooting it.
|
February 11, 2007, 03:49 PM | #3 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 31, 2006
Posts: 1,528
|
I think the 25-20 is a neat old caliber it would work good on the Jackrabbits besides great fun. Cool gun like that will usually makes conservation with other hunters evertime you run into some.
|
February 16, 2007, 08:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
|
Added Confusion
I went back to the gunshop today. The 1892 is still there, but now there is an 1894 in .25-35 too. The condition and price of the rifles are similar. Which would you buy?
|
February 16, 2007, 08:59 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
Me?
Neither one. I don't buy guns for investment or (any more) for Cool Factor. There is nothing I want to shoot at that calls for a .25-xx lever action. Sorry I could not be more help spending your money. |
February 16, 2007, 09:04 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
|
Re:jimwatson
The jackrabbits and deer out here in the west are pretty wussy creatures. They don't need the "oomph" that game in other parts of the country require.
|
February 16, 2007, 09:53 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
Well, .25-20 = jackrabbits; .25-35 = deer & jackrabbits.
Do you handload? Availability and price of factory loads in obsolete calibers like that will hurt your feelings. |
February 17, 2007, 01:45 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 31, 2006
Posts: 1,528
|
I would take the 25-35 but its for you. get a reloading book and and make some comparisons.
|
February 17, 2007, 01:57 PM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 17, 2006
Location: In the Mid-West
Posts: 321
|
25-20
That caliber makes a good coyote gun!
|
February 17, 2007, 03:09 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Other things being about equal, I would buy the 92, but just because I think they are "neater" than the 94.
Jim |
February 17, 2007, 05:55 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
Esthetically, I'd prefer the '92 over the '94; the innards hanging down out of the bottom of the '94 aren't pretty. Though I understand how Mr Browning used that to get such long cartridges as .30-30 through a slim receiver. And if it is a rifle rather than a carbine, that would make up a lot.
Just a case of whether you need the power, really. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|