The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 26, 2015, 12:47 PM   #1
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
Ruger Hawkeye bore diameter in 7.62x39

hello all,
I was just curious if anyone knows the actual bore diameter of the Ruger M77s that are chambered in 7.62x39mm. the other day I was told that they actually have a .308 diameter bore instead of .311 as is customary with 7.62x39 so I was just wondering if anyone has taken a pair of calipers to their gun to verify this.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old December 26, 2015, 01:19 PM   #2
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
I believe Ruger got away from using incorrect diameters when relatively inexpensive ammo arrived. Mind you, their site indicates no M77's in 7.62 x 39.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old December 26, 2015, 03:29 PM   #3
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
it has likely been replaced, they often make only a runs of a cartridge and then replace it for something else. rest assured they do exist. my brother bought one last year.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old December 27, 2015, 11:40 AM   #4
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I looked into one when they first came out and that was one of the things that turned me off on it. I have no idea if they ever changed it or not. I believe their mini thirty was .308 also. There may be more guns like that out there too. I had bought an RCBS Die set and it came with both expander balls included.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old December 27, 2015, 10:54 PM   #5
Unlicensed Dremel
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2014
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
I believe Ruger got away from using incorrect diameters when relatively inexpensive ammo arrived.
So are you saying that they moved away from .308, the incorrect diameter, and went back to .311, the correct diameter, at some point in the last 10-20 years? Just making sure I understand you.
Unlicensed Dremel is offline  
Old December 28, 2015, 01:16 AM   #6
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
Quote:
I believe their mini thirty was .308 also.
Yes. No. And, "only at one end of the barrel..." (Seriously.)

...But that's a totally different subject.


Quote:
(...) the other day I was told that they actually have a .308 diameter bore instead of .311 as is customary with 7.62x39 (...)
Standard groove diameter for 7.62x39mm barrels is 0.3105".

I dug up an old thread on another forum, with a quote from Ruger customer service, in regards to the barrel specifications on the Hawkeye Compact in 7.62x39mm, dated 9/24/2009.
The important information from within it:
Bore diameter production tolerance was 0.3000-0.3015".
Groove diameter was 0.3100-0.3115".

So, no, they did not have 0.308" groove diameters.


...But with that bore diameter, you can probably get away with shooting 0.308" bullets without much performance loss.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old December 28, 2015, 04:54 AM   #7
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Don't believe everything you read on the net.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old December 28, 2015, 05:12 PM   #8
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunplummer
Don't believe everything you read on the net.
Some of us get our information from more sources than just the internet, such as things like, you know... actual Mini-Thirties.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old December 28, 2015, 09:59 PM   #9
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Believe what you want.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old December 29, 2015, 07:39 PM   #10
VTRich
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 288
I used to have a Ruger 77 in 7.62x39 and I slugged the bore at .311

I also had a later Mini 30 that I also slugged at .311

It's my understanding the very first Mini-30's used .308 bores, but then switched to .311
VTRich is offline  
Old December 30, 2015, 01:27 AM   #11
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
Quote:
It's my understanding the very first Mini-30's used .308 bores, but then switched to .311
Yep, pretty much.
Ruger did use an unconventional approach to the matter, though. Some people say the barrels had long throats. Some people say they had tapered bores. No on ever agrees. But, the bottom line is that the muzzle had 0.308" groove diameter, while the chamber end of the barrel had a 0.312" groove diameter and a long throat.
In '92 they transitioned to the ".311" barrels and a standard throat.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old December 30, 2015, 05:02 AM   #12
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
That makes a lot of sense. If the neck and free bore are reamed to .311, you could shoot .311 bullets down a .308 bore and never know the difference. Accuracy will tell you nothing at deer hunting ranges. I had quite a few .311 barrels that shot great with .308 bullets. The only one I have left I LOAD with .308 bullets because it shoots better. I would go with Ruger having used .308 barrels on their early bolt actions. The thought of "Choked" rifle barrel does not sound right to me.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old December 31, 2015, 12:11 PM   #13
1100 tac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2012
Posts: 299
Did anyone ask Ruger???
1100 tac is offline  
Old December 31, 2015, 05:44 PM   #14
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Ever have a technical conversation with some one that answers the phone at a large corporation?
Gunplummer is offline  
Old December 31, 2015, 10:55 PM   #15
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
Quote:
Did anyone ask Ruger???
Technical questions directed at Ruger, especially for models that had significant changes made over the years, will only get you information on the very last variant that was made. And, often, the answer is directly out of the owner's manual. ....If you get an answer at all.


In my first post in this thread, I provided Ruger's response from when these rifles were still in production (meaning it's the correct information). They have ".311" barrels.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old January 1, 2016, 12:48 PM   #16
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
OK, I had to go look to make sure my memory was serving me correctly. My 4th printing (1994) Hornady load book states that Ruger uses .308 barrels on their mini-30. I kinda trust that over a sales brochure. I have RCBS dies and there is both a .308 and .311 expander ball included. This is just a cracker barrel argument anyway. I cannot say for sure, but would bet the neck and freebore on the chamber ARE for a .311 bullet. Nothing will happen if you shoot .311 bullets. Nothing ever has happened or there would have been a law suit by now. Fire away.

If you are interested enough, P.O. Ackley did some testing with an 8mm and .30 caliber that parallels this discussion.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old January 1, 2016, 01:20 PM   #17
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
Quote:
If you are interested enough, P.O. Ackley did some testing with an 8mm and .30 caliber that parallels this discussion.
Also .35 caliber bullets from a .35 caliber chamber, into a .30 caliber barrel.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old January 1, 2016, 01:27 PM   #18
TBM900
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 777
I became tired chasing an M77 in 7.62x39 that shot well, rifle after rifle both stock and after tweeking just wouldn't shoot well. I finally bought my first CZ527 and couldn't be happier, stellar accuracy right out of the box.

I really wish Ruger would offer the American Ranch in 7.62x39 and in stainless, they would sell a heck of a lot more of those than the ones they offer in 300blk.
TBM900 is offline  
Old January 1, 2016, 02:26 PM   #19
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I always thought that out of all the big name manufacturers, Ruger had one of the best made bolt actions. I also thought their barrels were not as well made as other companies.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old January 6, 2016, 01:57 AM   #20
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,273
Ruger

I have two Rugers in the x39 caliber, an early Mini-30 bought in the Clinton era, and a stainless lightweight boat paddle M77MkII, the bolt rifle purchase about 5 years after the Mini. I have not slugged either.

That said, the Mini has shot all manner of x39mm ammo. Both rifles have seen .308 dia reloads, the Mini has seen ammo from across the board and has been shot quite a bit. The M77 seems to indicate a bit higher pressure using .310 slugs during a recent search for a new x39mm slug, but that could be due to any number of factors. The vast bulk of the bolt rifle shooting has been with the now discontinued Sierra 135 SSP bullet intended for the .30 Herrett.

Regards Ruger barrels, the early Ruger barrels on the M77 were contract barrels as I understand it, and sometimes barrel quality was not what it could be. When Ruger started making their own barrels (not sure when, likely when the MkII hit the market) barrel quality overall is believed to have improved.

My Mini30's accuracy is so-so, but the M77MkII will shoot into 1.5MOA with reloads assembled without any accuracy tweaking.
bamaranger is offline  
Old January 6, 2016, 10:38 AM   #21
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
Ruger started making rifle barrels in-house in 1991.
780-prefix 77 Mk IIs are in the transition period where they could have a Ruger barrel or a contract barrel.
All other 77 Mk IIs and Hawkeyes, as far as Ruger has divulged, will have Ruger barrels.


Basic timeline of Ruger 77 barrels:
Douglas from '67-'73
Wilson from '73-'91 (earned a bad reputation for unpredictability, especially when warm)
Ruger hammer-forged from '91-Current
Other contracts filled in where needed, if Wilson or Douglas couldn't meet demand.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old January 9, 2016, 01:13 AM   #22
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,273
there ya'go

Thanks FrankenMauser
bamaranger is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10205 seconds with 10 queries