|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 17, 2013, 02:34 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,075
|
Range Report -- New Ruger Single Nine Revolver
Got my new Single Nine to the range after work. My goals was to zero the sights at 30 feet and also just generally check out the new gun to ensure full and good functioning. Went to my favorite range, Field Time Training & Target in Stanton.
For those of you who might be unfamiliar with the Single Nine, it is a Ruger single-action nine-shot .22WMR (not .22LR) revolver. The Single Nine does not feature interchangeable cylinders and is specifically designed for the .22WMR round. The barrel is 6.5" to accommodate the ballistics of the .22WMR round. The revolver comes standard with Williams Fire Sights as shown at the pictures below. Out of the box the revolver was shooting a couple of inches left and slightly low. A couple of clicks on the Williams Fire Sights and it was shooting right on the money. The Williams sights really make getting a good sight picture easier. I really like these sights. My groups were a bit erratic; I will need to practice more with the Single Nine. It is sure a fun handgun to shoot! FYI I was shooting Federal Game-Shok rounds. Functioning was fine. No problem pushing the rounds out with the extractor. The rounds fit tight, but not excessively so. The trigger felt good and the action is nice, tight, and precise. It seemed to sort of "break in" after a couple of reloadings. Maybe that was my imagination; it just seemed to get a little smoother. Going to really do some target shooting with it this weekend now that I have zeroed it. Cleaning the Single Nine is a breeze. This is a very easy revolver to maintain. My new addition:
__________________
The difference between a citizen and a civilian is that the citizen makes the safety of the body politic his personal responsibility, protecting it with his life. The civilian does not. |
April 19, 2013, 11:50 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 21, 2009
Location: Denver area
Posts: 504
|
I recently purchased a blackhawk in .327 and installed a hi-viz front sight on the gun similar to yours. Much easier to pick up than the stock sight. Especially for those of us with experienced eyes
__________________
Jim Many K and N Frames |
May 10, 2013, 11:50 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2013
Posts: 5
|
That is a beautiful firearm. I've always wanted a 22 mag, but decided a while back that if I can't reload it, I don't want it.
I had a single six convertable 22 which I sold about 40 years ago. I kick myself at least once a day for doing that.
__________________
Ruger 357/9mm convertible, NRA member S&W Governor, Heritage Arms 32 Mag Sig P250 in 45cal and 9mm, Sig 1911 22 cal Handloading 45ACP, 45 Colt, 32 Mag, 9mm, 357 Mag |
May 15, 2013, 08:25 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: Burien,WA
Posts: 897
|
that a mighty pretty single 9 there, i wonder if ruger is going to come out with a single 9 convert?
__________________
Rugers:SR1911 CMD,MK 3 .22lr 6",Sec. Six '76 liberty .357 4",SRH .480 Ruger 7.5",Mini-14 188 5.56/.233 18.5", Marlins: 795 .22lr 16.5",30aw 30-30 20",Mossberg:Mav. 88 Tact. 12 ga, 18.5",ATR 100 .270 Win. 22",S&W:SW9VE 9mm 4",Springfield:XD .357sig 4", AKs:CAI PSL-54C, WASR 10/63, WW74,SLR-106c |
May 17, 2013, 06:13 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
|
Nice revolver. If you don't want all the noise and flash of the .22WMR try out a box of .22WRF. They are not quite a powerful but much more pleasent to shoot. I bought 2,000 rounds before the election. They were priced a little lower than the magnums. Also if you are using them for hunting they don't detroy as much meat as the magnums.
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8 |
May 18, 2013, 09:57 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,075
|
Interesting idea about the .22 WRF. I have never seen that for sale anywhere but I will keep the idea in mind. I really like the .22WMR caliber. Nice combination of power and low recoil.
__________________
The difference between a citizen and a civilian is that the citizen makes the safety of the body politic his personal responsibility, protecting it with his life. The civilian does not. |
May 18, 2013, 03:36 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,738
|
For a really low flash signature...check out Hornady's "Self Defense" round in 22 WMR.
__________________
That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." --- George Orwell |
May 18, 2013, 05:54 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2013
Posts: 3
|
I want one. I cant figure out why, I just want one . Its pretty, fills a category that is currently empty in my collection, and I've always been interested in the .22mag even though I've never shot one. Go figure. Hopefully it will make it to the top of the wish list one day.
Nice gun, and thanks for reviewing. |
May 22, 2013, 04:49 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,075
|
I am finding that one of the really nice things about this revolver is the Williams Fire Sight system that it comes with. Really makes shooting it a pleasure.
__________________
The difference between a citizen and a civilian is that the citizen makes the safety of the body politic his personal responsibility, protecting it with his life. The civilian does not. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|