|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 7, 2013, 01:11 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
Longitudinal splits in new 22-250 brass
I recently encountered some case failures on W-W Super 22-250 rifle brass. The brass was new old stock, had been loaded for several years. 3 of the first 17 rounds fired has case failures. Some specifics
- The brass had the neck expanded prior to loading but had not been sized, it was new brass. - The splits occurred in starting to mid loads and there was absolutely no indication of excessive pressure. I had fired the max loads during the round robin. The loads that split were relatively mild. - 50 gr. Sierra Spitzer bullets, IMR 4350 Powder, Rem 9 1/2 primers - Case weights were normal, nothing noticed as any different. - I am sure the brass was purchased as a lot of 100 and the other 50 rounds had been fired previously with no problems. I realize that in a brass case reacting to internal pressure, the circumferential stress is 2X the longitudinal stress. So it is twice as likely to split in a longitudinal direction rather than a circumferential. I just haven't seen case splits like this in new brass before near the case head. I have seen plenty of other type infant mortality failures in new brass (neck splits, etc.) Just thought I would share. I intent to split the cases in the near future and check the interior. I pulled the bullets on the remaining 33 rounds and deprimed them. Everything looked normal. Powder was not deteriorated. |
April 7, 2013, 01:27 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
Seen splits go the other 90* way a few times. But never like this as seen. By chance did you use a small base resizing die prior on this brass?
|
April 7, 2013, 02:16 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,459
|
New brass - could be defective from the maker. Improper annealing, basic metal with inclusions, who knows. Any chance your rounds have seen a corrosive environment, say contact with ammonia?
|
April 7, 2013, 02:48 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,903
|
That looks like weak (over-annealed) brass that failed at the transition between case wall and head.
Contact your supplier ASAP along w/ these pics and the Lot# of the brass. |
April 9, 2013, 10:40 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2000
Location: Colombia, SC
Posts: 745
|
4350 is normally not a powder to use in a 22/250 with light bullets. I did use it in a 22/250 with the 64 gr WW PP bullets. Either way, this is very strange. Maybe try a more "regular" 22/250 load and see if it still happens. Sometimes light loads of slow powders can do weird things, but it is definitely telling you something bad is about to happen..
__________________
I don't have time for busy people |
April 10, 2013, 12:01 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Posts: 434
|
Interestingly I had some factory Winchester 22-250 cases have split case necks last week.. they were factory loads, 45 grain HP's, probably about 15 years old having spent most of that time in my Dad's cabinet in the house.
|
April 10, 2013, 07:51 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2013
Location: Lenhartsville, PA
Posts: 164
|
Quote:
|
|
April 10, 2013, 08:25 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 1,401
|
Fully concur with most. I too believe it is a brass problem related to manufacturing.
|
April 10, 2013, 08:24 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
Quote:
I checked the head space of the W-W brass both fired and unfired, and found no difference in head space. Less than 0.001" difference. So the head space for the rifle and the brass is correct. Head space on REM brass fired in the same rifle also showed the same head space. Excessive head space tends to crate thinning just above the reinforced portion of the brass at the head. This weakened portion tends to fail with a circumferential crack due the the thinning. Not a longitudinal crack. |
|
April 10, 2013, 08:37 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|