The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 16, 2011, 01:36 AM   #1
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
Can anyone id THIS GUN?

My friend found this old Colt among his fathers belongings after he died a few years back. He said he has had it since sometime in the '60s. Can anyone tell me what it is and maybe a general idea what it would sell for?











Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 06:48 AM   #2
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
Colt 51 Navy. It appears that the old patina has been removed, that hurts value but still worth a good sum, 800-1k. Check Gunbroker completed auctions for current prices.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 12:03 PM   #3
32 Magnum
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: January 17, 2009
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 364
Tell your friend not to do anymore polishing of that piece - cylinder roll mark (naval battle scene) seems to be one of the sharpest I've seen in a long time.
The rest of the stampings are in v.good condition also. That is one very nice example.
32 Magnum is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 08:10 PM   #4
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,477
Colt 1851 Navy number 25,706 was made in 1853.
1853 serial numbers started at 20,000.

Yours is a Third Model as made from serial number 4,200 to 85,000.
Value depends on the amount of remaining original finish.
Warn him NOT TO "clean it up". Removing original finish can lower the value by thousands of dollars.

Here's the values from the Blue Book. These will probably be low.
20% original finish....$1,100
30%....$1,200
40%....$1,600
50%....$2,000
60%....$3,000
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 08:43 PM   #5
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
I never saw one with a 5 digit number on the cylinder. I didn't think Colt used anything but the last four digits of the serial number. All I've ever seen were like that anyway.
Hawg is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 09:19 PM   #6
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
It had been finished with a chrome or nickel finish at one point. that is why it is so shiny.
Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 09:46 PM   #7
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,967
It's blued. It was never plated.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 10:32 PM   #8
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
no, it is a bright chrome shiny finish, the pictures dont show it for some reason.
Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 11:31 AM   #9
Claddagh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2009
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 313
That's a real shame. AFAIK, unless it was some sort of essentially unique custom order and you can provide written provenance of that from Colt, that refinishing pretty much eliminated whatever potential collector interest (read:$$$) it might've generated given its overall condition and even traces of the original finish.

Dfariswheel's post will give you an idea of how much it might've brought otherwise. I seriously doubt that it would bring as much as 2/3 of the 20% figure in its current state. My condolences.
Claddagh is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 01:42 PM   #10
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
In replying to the same OP on another forum, I believed the gun was blued and said it looked like a modern tank blue. I was obviously wrong, but anyway it is not the original finish, and the gun shows all the signs of having been polished and refinished.

I also said that the barrel marking appears to be either "enhanced" or spurious and that the serial numbers are faked. I am not sure the gun is even original; it could be a repro faked up to look like an original, but even if it is original, it has little value since it has been worked over.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 03:16 PM   #11
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
more photos, better light.












Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 06:09 PM   #12
medalguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,033
In the first set of pics, the inside of the cylinders looked awfully sharp and clean too.
medalguy is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 09:28 PM   #13
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
In those later pics the heavy polishing is much more evident. Again, MHO is that it is a repro faked up with a spurious barrel marking and faked serial number markings. (Most repros have a single number on the frame in a modern font. Fakers often remove that and put on numbers in the Colt manner.) Anyway I don't believe it is original and doubt it has any real value.

And yes, faked up repros have been around ever since there were repros. The first actual repros (as distinct from contemporary counterfeits) were imported in the 1959-1960 period for the Civil War centennial, and have been coming in ever since. And they were being used as a basis for fakes about a microsecond after they hit the market.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 09:45 PM   #14
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
quote: "In the first set of pics, the inside of the cylinders looked awfully sharp and clean too. "

The inside of the cylinders are dirty, and look like burnt straw has stuck to the inside of the chambers. I just cant get my camera to show that though.
Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 11:12 PM   #15
RJay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
Those serial numbers were never put on in a Colt factory. sorry about that.
RJay is offline  
Old May 17, 2011, 11:26 PM   #16
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
Yeah, the numbers didn't match any from any 1851 photos i have seen online.
Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 18, 2011, 11:59 AM   #17
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I don't think the barrel marking was put on by Colt either. Some letters are slanted or out of line and the "dash" at the front end is slanted. Roll stamps just don't do things like that.

My only puzzlement is why someone went to a lot of trouble to take a repro, alter the markings well enough to fool most folks, then plate the gun. Anyone who knew enough about old Colts to fake that address and serial numbering would know that the 1851 Navy was made with blued barrel and cylinder and color case hardened frame and was never overall plated. I wonder if there were not two people involved, at different times - one produced a pretty good fake, then the other wanted a plated gun and didn't care what it was.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old May 18, 2011, 08:09 PM   #18
sc928porsche
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
Its still a good looking piece and should be fun to fire.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it.
sc928porsche is offline  
Old May 18, 2011, 08:25 PM   #19
Joe from N.Y.
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Posts: 16
Quote:
"I don't think the barrel marking was put on by Colt either. Some letters are slanted or out of line and the "dash" at the front end is slanted. Roll stamps just don't do things like that."
That dash is actually a wedge shape, with the point facing the left. My camera didn't get a good shot, and the chrome job filled in some very thin engravings, such as COLT PATENT on the left side of the frame under the cylinder.

(Thanks for the lesson on quoting)

Last edited by Joe from N.Y.; May 19, 2011 at 10:16 PM.
Joe from N.Y. is offline  
Old May 19, 2011, 07:41 PM   #20
kozak6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
Look here:
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=323215

Basically, you copy and paste the text you want to quote into your post. Then, you put quote tags around it like so:

[quote] The text you want to quote. [/quote]

That, will make this:

Quote:
The text you want to quote.
kozak6 is offline  
Old May 20, 2011, 12:32 PM   #21
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
Hi, Joe,

That line isn't supposed to be wedge shaped or at an angle and it looks to me like the "D"s are at an angle. The "S" in SAML is out of line and it looks like someone tried to cover that up by marring the barrel in that area. IMHO, it was done using a guide and individual hand stamps. The "Colts Patent" marking is normal on reproductions and likely was put on the gun by the factory. The barrel markings on those Colts were put on with a roll stamp and are pretty uniform. For an idea what I mean by that, I am attaching a picture of a much later Colt roll stamp; as you see, there is no way any letter or symbol could possibly be out of line.

Jim
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Die face.jpg (69.8 KB, 63 views)
File Type: jpg Die Side.jpg (18.1 KB, 48 views)
James K is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08344 seconds with 11 queries