The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 17, 2011, 05:17 PM   #26
Eagle Eye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 178
Glad you and your gun made the trip safely....and glad you paid some taxes into the system to help the poor gubmint of this Socialistic States of America grow....and hope I never get all the gubmint I'm paying for....yeah. I would have carried it in my trunk.
__________________
It is unethical to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is obviously unarmed.
Eagle Eye is offline  
Old August 17, 2011, 07:59 PM   #27
hermannr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
Forget the "use tax". You are not purchasing or selling, or registering a vehicle. You do not need to register a weapon you already own when you move to WA, not even Seattle. No registration, no use tax. Even with your car, if it is over 6 months old they will not hit you for "use" tax.

The use tax only comes into play when you purchase a weapon from out of state, when you already live here, then you pay it to the FFL and he submits it with his sales tax collections.. You do not need an FFL to bring your previously legally owned weapon, and you do not need to pay the use tax on any previously owned weapon....just bring it and forget the fluff.

Bring any weapon you wish, without any strings....except for a full auto..full auto is a no-no.

In WA you can OC without a permit, or you can apply for a "shall issue" permit to CC. There is no weapon attached to you permit (you do not even need a weapon to apply for a CPL)

Ufu: you got ripped off. There is no 10% sales tax in WA,
hermannr is offline  
Old August 17, 2011, 11:58 PM   #28
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by uFu
Thanks for all the answers. To Eagle Eye, my biggest concern with stashing it in the trunk for the trip is that FOPA only allows for food & gas stops. The law doesn't even mention sleep, so I think the Grand Canyon and Hoover Dam would be pushing it a bit
The FOPA doesn't mention food or gas stops, either. Transporting interstate, in accordance with the FOPA, should be no problem anywhere -- ESPECIALLY if packed with your household goods and belongings for a permanent (or long-term) relocation.

But ... as someone already mentioned, it IS legal for you to ship firearms to yourself, with no FFL involved. After all, it isn't a transfer of ownership, it's only transportation from Point A to Point B. The conditions are that YOU have to personally pack and ship the firearms on the PA end, and YOU have to personally open the package(s) on the WA end. They can be shipped to you in care of some other person (your GF, if she's already there), but the third party is not allowed to open the packages -- only to receive them and hold them for you.

Check the BATFE FAQ -- this is specifically discussed.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old August 18, 2011, 11:50 AM   #29
Hardcase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
Quote:
The use tax only comes into play when you purchase a weapon from out of state, when you already live here, then you pay it to the FFL and he submits it with his sales tax collections.. You do not need an FFL to bring your previously legally owned weapon, and you do not need to pay the use tax on any previously owned weapon....just bring it and forget the fluff.
Unfortunately, not true in this case. The use tax comes into play when you transfer a firearm from out of state from one person to another, which is what the OP did - from himself to his girlfriend. The state law is crystal clear that tax is owed by the recipient, even if the gun is a gift, which is what it is in this case.

As far as the tax rate, from my cursory search, it's 9.5% in Seattle.

That's why I wondered what would have happened if he'd let the FFL hold the gun until he was a bona fide resident of Washington.

As the OP pointed out himself, it probably would have been a whole lot better (and just as legal) to have just locked it in the trunk instead of going through the rigmarole of the FFL transfer.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae
Hardcase is offline  
Old August 18, 2011, 12:03 PM   #30
maestro pistolero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
But he didn't transfer it to his GF, right? He elected to wait the 90 days, so what was the use tax for?
Quote:
my GF wasn't crazy about being the "owner" of my gun, and the FFL certainly didn't like the idea of a sham-ish sale to get around the 90-day rule. So I had to wait the 90 days. Plus a NICS delay for the better part of a week (no idea what that was about). And... they insisted on collecting state sales tax of 10% of the value of the gun.
maestro pistolero is offline  
Old August 18, 2011, 12:27 PM   #31
Hardcase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
You're absolutely right! I misread that part of his post. Hmm...I think that he's got a pretty good case to make for reimbursement from the tax commission.

I think that the problem is that the law doesn't address his particular situation, so the gun shop, in a case of CYA, opted to treat the out of state transfer as a sale or gift.

On the bright side, now that the OP is a resident of Washington, he can lobby his state legislators to add some clarification to the law!
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae
Hardcase is offline  
Old August 19, 2011, 11:30 PM   #32
hermannr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
It's simple, the FFL ripped him off. Sales tax here is 7.8% (7.5% state, 0.3% county if I remember correctly, been a while sisce I had to collect sales tax), and yes, I know king county adds their own, and Seattle city probably adds some too, but there is no 10% tax anywhere I know of in WA.

Secondly, it was not (as I understand) a "transfer between persons of different states", and it also was not a "recent acquisition"..sorry, no tax required.

It is too bad he lived in NY long enough that he no longer realized the rest of the US (with the exception of maybe NJ, MA and Chicago) are still part of a more or less free nation.

As to the statement about the legislature clearing up the problem??? they created it,
hermannr is offline  
Old August 19, 2011, 11:33 PM   #33
Sgt Pepper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 811
This entire thread seems so bizarre to me.

If I board a flight tomorrow and I want to take a gun with me, I pack it in a locked gubmint approved container sans ammo inside my checked luggage, announce it to the staff, get on the plane, arrive at my destination, pick up my checked luggage off the conveyor, and off I go. No tax. No registration. No third parties. No proof of ownership.

The reason that he got taxed because he did an FFL transfer when there was NO TRANSFER!

All that being said, my hat is off to the OP who went out of his way, way way way out of his way, to stay "legal." And the gun control freaks are so worried about us lawful folk.....
Sgt Pepper is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06560 seconds with 10 queries