|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 17, 2004, 09:35 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: October 22, 2004
Location: Wallyworld, CT
Posts: 26
|
Changing 308 Win brass to 243 Win
Can I use my 243 dies to neck down 308 surplus brass? Is there a
(or multiple) "in between" dies specifically for this process? |
November 17, 2004, 10:45 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2000
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pa
Posts: 1,029
|
I've done it. It is possible. The result is a thick neck that should be turned.
Tom |
November 17, 2004, 11:15 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: October 22, 2004
Location: Wallyworld, CT
Posts: 26
|
Outside neck turned?
|
November 18, 2004, 08:03 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2000
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pa
Posts: 1,029
|
I can't speak from experience on the turning. My solution to the problem of thick necks was to simply get some 243 brass and use the 308 brass in the my 308(duh... what was I thinking???) I only trim for length.
One good intro to the subject is: http://www.realguns.com/Commentary/comar88.htm |
November 18, 2004, 11:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 934
|
It's doable. Some dies and some lots of brass will do it in one pass. Better to use a 7-08 or .260 die as an intermediary. Whether the necks need more attention depends on your rifle and the lot of brass you use. The neck must be a couple of thous smaller than the chamber neck to release the bullet. If it isn't, the neck must be thinned, preferrably by inside neck reaming. If what you have is an outside turner, turn in the .308 or the intermediate step.
Conventional wisdom says to reduce your max charge two grains using reformed military because of the heavier cases. |
November 18, 2004, 03:03 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 1, 1999
Location: St. Louis, MO suburbs
Posts: 386
|
IMHO this is way more trouble than it's worth. Buying .243 brass is my suggestion.
Whatever method you choose to remove the extra brass from the neck area will be time consuming. In those earlier days when resizing 30/06 brass was the only way to get .25/06 brass I did a fair amount of this, but not after I could buy the brass. |
November 18, 2004, 06:47 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 934
|
You might not need to remove any brass from the neck. Depends on your brass and your chamber neck. Worth forming a few to check.
Even neckturning is not much of chore for me. I chuck the Forster rig in a drill press, lube the necks with kerosene on a Q tip, and let the dirll press do the work. It does it fast, too. I admit being cheap. When a thousand .308 is available for the price of 200 of its relatives, I'll do some reforming. |
November 18, 2004, 08:08 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Posts: 54
|
boy thats some work
Ive reloaded for both rounds and it takes some time or a weekend warrior could do somthing like that or just some one who takes pride in there work. im going to suggest buying new brass for both rounds and load them as many time as you feel comfortable. be sure to look at the brass closely, I was just messing around looking over some new winchester rounds that came out off a browing 243 semi auto and I think it could have been worn out. because under a microscope i found a hole near the rim on one case and one great big buldge one on the bottom side of the same case reminds me of a double barrel shotgun i owned as a kid one barrel sodybody messed up and must have got a little snow in it at one point in time. . Im glad i caught myself cause i did reload some of the brass. the rounds were brand new so didnt think a gun would mess them up. i could have been out of a 243 loading new winchester brass from a worn gun
|
November 19, 2004, 11:12 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: October 22, 2004
Location: Wallyworld, CT
Posts: 26
|
This was the plan as I can buy once fired 308 brass at 1/10th the
price of new 243 brass. Call me a cheap bastard. I deserve it. Leftoverdj wrote: I admit being cheap. When a thousand .308 is available for the price of 200 of its relatives, I'll do some reforming. |
November 19, 2004, 01:23 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Posts: 54
|
its cool do your thing
I feel ya man. i under stand its easy to make a round. and im no one to judge so keep on loading that good brass
|
November 19, 2004, 06:46 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,801
|
Raod.W said, "This was the plan as I can buy once fired 308 brass at 1/10th the
price of new 243 brass. Call me a cheap bastard. I deserve it." Being thrifty is one thing. Being stupid and potentially blowing up a rifle is something else. I did not notice if this was brought up, but if it was, it still bears repeating. Measure the neck of a once fired factory .243 round. Then, measure the neck of the .308 case you've converted to .243 after steating a bullet in that case. If that case with the bullet seated is at least .002" smaller than the fired .243 case, you should be OK. Better yet if it's even smaller. That case has to have sufficient room to properly expand at the neck to release the bullet. If it does not, very high pressures and a potential KABOOM. It's OK to be thrifty, but not at the expense of your safety. You can't grow back missing body parts or eyes. Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION! |
November 19, 2004, 09:17 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 934
|
Paul, you are ignoring brass springback. The neck does need to be a couple of thous smaller than the ID of the chamber neck, but a fired case is no measure of that unless the case neck was annealed dead soft before firing. A chamber cast might be in order, but I generally just load up one of reformed cases with a starting load and have at it. Since I anneal somewhere along the line, that case will give me an accurate reading. Just loading the chamber manually is probably good enough since you can feel resistance if the cartridge is too large, but I am a cautious chap.
|
November 20, 2004, 02:37 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 12, 2002
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 266
|
I have done it with GI brass
And used an inside neck reamer and even went down to 22-250.
Paul Last edited by Paul Fitz Jones; November 20, 2004 at 02:38 AM. Reason: addition |
November 20, 2004, 08:55 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 3, 1999
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,991
|
I had a 308 case get into my 7-08 cases during reloading and I did not catch it. I loaded to my usual load (not hot but nice shooter) and had the primer blow. I think the key components were case neck thickness, very hot day (about 110f) and internal case volume.
Just be very cautious as you do this. Check, double check and proceed carefully. By the way, I won't buy a 243 because I already have 308 reloads, 7-08 reloads and after this experience, I don't want to make the same mistake. I bought federal gold medal brass for my 308's and I only use Nickled 7-08 cases to avoid the confusion.
__________________
10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super! |
November 22, 2004, 11:10 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: October 22, 2004
Location: Wallyworld, CT
Posts: 26
|
Ok, I resized three of the 308 to 243.
I made sure I did a little at a time so as not to heat the case by working
it too quickly. I did three cases with each in about five steps. I was only using the 243 FL die. I found it supprising that the neck thickness only changed by .002 dia (1 thousandth all around) from the size when it was a 308 case. The loaded round seems to chamber ok. Another interesting thing was the unloaded case was about .060 too short. Does anyone see a problem with this (other than not being able to use a factory crimp die)? I will be shooting it in a Tikka T3. Paul B.: I understand your concern about the size once loaded and I will go back and measure before firing. I will compare to my other standard handloads as well as some factory loads. |
|
|