The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 19, 2014, 11:36 PM   #1
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
Looking for load data with a 357/38 with a 358 caliber rifle bullet.

I am looking for some place that has load data for a cast lead .358 caliber rifle bullet loaded into 38 special or 357 magnum brass. I am doing some experimenting with a Ruger 77/357 Bolt action. Id like to try some really heavy bullets to see how they do. I am not looking for lots of speed just some thing that will go bang and be safe in pressure.

any one know where to look?
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well...
Deja vu is offline  
Old December 20, 2014, 12:50 AM   #2
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
Lyman #49 has data for 204 gr. lead rifle bullets (Lyman #358315) in the Contender/Encore section, but the OAL is 1.880", will that work in your magazine?

Otherwise the next step down is a 170 SWC revolver bullet at 1.647".

Speer #11 only has data for jacketed rifle bullets, but it might give you a place to start.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old December 20, 2014, 01:03 AM   #3
Kosh75287
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2007
Posts: 820
Reaching back a ways.

I recall an old (1971) load for .38 Special and a 200 grain lead round nose from a 6" barreled S&W K-38. It was 7.8/Hercules 2400/200. I recall it, because it was the only load listed whose Bullet Weight x Velocity exceeded 160,000 (which, for reasons I no longer remember, was important at the time). Since the old projectile was designed for a pistol, it has a very long bearing surface, which means lots of rifling engagement, and (usually) great stability. Heavier projectiles NOT designed for handguns may have less bearing surface, and may not engage rifling enough to stabilize, especially at lower velocities. Higher velocities may or may not help things.

This load was from the days before we knew what "+P" meant, so I suspect the pressures were at or below 16,000 psi. As always, I suggest cutting the load 10% and working up.

Since these loads are going through a rifle, you may be able to load the heavier projectiles to a greater overall length, which often translates to lower pressures.
Kosh75287 is offline  
Old December 20, 2014, 08:56 AM   #4
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
I dont know how long it will let me go. I already load my 357 magnums a little long because my Coonan and My Marlin would both cycle them well at the longer length. My Marlin never really did like 38 specials. I know there is still a bit of room. I tired a 357 maximum in the magazine and it was too long for the mag and for the chamber. So its some where between a long 357 magnum and a 357 maximum.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well...
Deja vu is offline  
Old December 20, 2014, 01:23 PM   #5
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,801
Kosh. I think the bullet you are referring to is the Lyman #358430, nominally a 190 gr. bullet. It casts to 200 gr. in my alloy. I loaded some to duplicate an old "Police" load for a friend. Shot quite well in an S&W M60 and K38.. Dunno why it was a "Police" load as it was pretty puny. Load was 3.5 gr. of Unique. I'll have to look but I think there may have been some data for H2400.

OK, from the Lyman #43 manual and 2400 (Hercules version) for the .357 Mag.
Start: 9.5 gr./655 FPS Max: 11.5 gr./ 1010 FPS

Unique:
Start: 3.5 gr./550 FPS Max: 5.5 gr./900 FPS

For the .38 Spl. only Bullseye and Unique are still around.
Bullseye:
Start: 2.0 gr./590 FPS Max: 2.7 gr./720

Unique:
Start: 2.0 gr./450 FPS Max: 4.0 gr./681 FPS

Note: Alliant states that their versions of Bullseye, Unique and 2400 are exactly the same as when Hercules made the powders. I personally take that Statement with a grain of salt. Remember this is from an older manual with less sophisticate pressure measuring techniques.
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!
Paul B. is offline  
Old December 20, 2014, 03:02 PM   #6
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
You could always trim brass down so that the crimp falls in the right place with the OAL you need. A common practice for silhouette shooters.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old December 20, 2014, 03:03 PM   #7
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
BTW, did you say Coonan? I'll be right over.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old December 21, 2014, 04:53 PM   #8
Crankylove
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2008
Location: 8B ID
Posts: 1,753
I've done 200 grain RN, and 250 SP (both for my 358 Winchester) in .38 and .357 cases.

I've loaded a few with Bullseye, but don't remember the powder charge.


Last few I did was Trailboss, about 90% load density. They aren't screaming fast, but we're good enough to kill soda cans and rotten pumpkins.
__________________
The answer to 1984 is 1776
Crankylove is offline  
Old December 21, 2014, 06:35 PM   #9
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I bought a 100 year old rebarreled Remington rolling block rifle, that neither the seller nor I knew what cartridge or caliber. Turns out it is a tight chamber [0.380" untapered chamber] 38 special.
I overloaded it until it pierced the CCI 450 small rifle magnum primers.
I am trying to think of what else I can do with it.
I have my own 0.380 reamer and some 357 MAX brass.
I could shoot a deer with it, if I could find a pointed and maybe boat tailed bullet.
Running through the possibilities in Quickload and Quicktarget, I can see I want to buy a separate throater, and make the throat deep. Then I can seat bullets to a long overall length, making a larger volume for the powder. I can't really hunt with a 200 yard gun, but I can easily hunt with a 400 yard gun.

http://www.nosler.com/accubond-bullet/
The Nosler accubond .358" 200 gr bullet has 0.15" of taper in the rear.
The case is 1.6".
The bullet is 1.213"
The over all length is 1.990", but we don't have to fit in a revolver.
That would only leave 13.3 gr of H20 space in the case with that bullet.
That would get me to a) 1339 fps with a temp stable powder and b) 1748 fps with a ball powder

But at if only 0.1" of non tapered bullet is inserted, I could seat [and throat for] 1.6 + 1.213 - .15 - .1 = 2.563"
That makes a usable case capacity of 27.841 gr of H20, or nearly double.

That would get me to c) 2130 fps with a temp stable powder and d) 2350 fps with a ball powder.

In perspective, with a scope tube center 1.97" above the barrel bore and the rifle zero'ed at 200 yards, then the range of 8 moa of elevation correction [seems to be MY limit] would be:
1) muzzle V -> range @-8moa, V at @-8moa = energy @-8moa
a) 1339 fps -> 265 yards, 1050 fps = 450 foot pounds [1.99" with temp stable powder]
b) 1748 fps -> 305 yards, 1249 fps = 643 foot pounds [1.99" with ball powder]
c) 2130 fps -> 355 yards, 1448 fps = 931 foot pounds [2.563" with temp stable powder]
d) 2350 fps -> 385 yards, 1552 fps = 1083 foot pounds [2.563" with ball powder]

There are other things to consider. The 1339 muzzle would be 10" high at 50 yards when zero'ed at 200, and that is not really acceptable.

And will a 0.349" pilot throating reamer be a special order? Or can a .349" bushing fit on their off the shelf throater?
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?

Last edited by Clark; December 21, 2014 at 06:41 PM.
Clark is offline  
Old December 21, 2014, 09:04 PM   #10
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
Clark one of these days I need to pick your brain for some of that knowledge/experience. I think that day is fast approaching with a new purchase a few months away.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07120 seconds with 10 queries