The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 22, 2013, 12:22 AM   #1
6.8
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2013
Posts: 316
Can the P95 withstand a Nuclear Blast?

If this isn't the toughest Polymer gun in the World, I like to see what is. Any owners out there care to chime in on this overbuilt Sledge Hammer. I want to purchase one in the near future. I'm wondering, how much Chamber Support does it have? Thanks for any feedback
6.8 is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 12:41 AM   #2
Mosin44az
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Posts: 2,582
Loved mine, 2500 rounds of U.S.-spec. ammo without a malfunction. OK, ONE, likely a dud round.

Don't know about chamber support, but unless you are going to try super handloads I wouldn't worry. Ruger says in the manual that NO U.S. spec. ammo is beyond the capability of the gun. I carried Cor-Bon +P in it for years without issue, and it was nice to shoot. It would be nice if they still sold the decocker-only version, I might get another...
Mosin44az is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 01:24 AM   #3
6.8
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2013
Posts: 316
I had a chance to handle one for the first time in over ten years. I apparently didnt remember how stout and over built it Is. And yes, I was planning on shooting some +P+ thru it.
6.8 is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 10:26 AM   #4
Fishbed77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
Quote:
Can the P95 withstand a Nuclear Blast?
It might, but you won't, so it's a moot question.
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 10:33 AM   #5
Dakotared
Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2012
Location: Cambridge Minnesota
Posts: 87
I had one and traded it away. I found it very easy to limp wrist and malfunction. I shot it fine but every one else shot it it was a jam-o-matic. My brother who spent time in Iraq had 13 out to 15 rounds jam up on him one time. My guess is that mine was not like most out there but I am much happier with what I have now, a full size steel witness.
Dakotared is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 11:41 AM   #6
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
My buddy bought a used one. Ugly, thick as a brick, shoots real well though, surprised me on how easy it was to shoot accurately. The DA trigger was very smooth, SA not so much, but it still shot well.
I don't like the tall, thin rear sight blade, but that's easily replaced.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 12:07 PM   #7
wbw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 18, 2008
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 738
I'm with Fishbed on this one. The question should be 'Can you withstand a nuclear blast?' I expect that the gun would last longer than you.
wbw is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 12:48 PM   #8
elDiabloLoco
Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 77
Quote:
I found it very easy to limp wrist and malfunction. I shot it fine but every one else shot it it was a jam-o-matic. My brother who spent time in Iraq had 13 out to 15 rounds jam up on him one time. My guess is that mine was not like most out there but I am much happier with what I have now, a full size steel witness.
I'm fairly small sized, and had trouble with my P95 with the first box. Thought it was limp wristing. But after re-cleaning and lubing, it has gone through about 12 boxes of mixed target ammo and about 80 HP without a single problem since. Very reliable, and more accurate than I can hold. Cycles mags loaded with different ammo in random order.

Slipped a Hogue hand-all over it. That makes it even fatter, but it is much easier to hold with the grip than without it, even with small hands.

Great fun to shoot, love the DA/SA trigger on it. Great value.

The only con I have on it is that my thumb is not long enough to reach the slide release.

Might not survive nukes, but probably outlives the cockroaches.
elDiabloLoco is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 12:51 PM   #9
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Literally, no.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 02:03 PM   #10
sfmedic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2012
Location: Currently Erbil, Iraq
Posts: 106
depends - how many KT are we talking and how far away will you be?

why are you interested in knowing? you on a greenlight team?
sfmedic is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 03:40 PM   #11
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
Used to have one. At the time it was the only semi I've ever owned that never malfunctioned -- ever. Come to think of it, it's the only semi I've ever owned that didn't malfunction. I didn't like to shoot it and it's way to large for daily carry so I don't have it any more. Mine was the decocker version, wish my 92FS was a decocker only.
pete2 is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 03:57 PM   #12
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
Anyone mind if we not test this?

Jim
James K is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 03:57 PM   #13
shouldazagged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 17, 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 273
Quote:
Might not survive nukes, but probably outlives the cockroaches.
My guess is the cockroaches will survive nukes. Them, the possum, and that damn little computer-generated gecko. And maybe Flo. And a few crooked lobbyists.
__________________
"Don't let macho be your epitaph."
---Ed Lovette
shouldazagged is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 06:25 PM   #14
6.8
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2013
Posts: 316
Thanks for the feedback. Any current owners out their that could slide a snap cap in and let us know about chamber support? P.S. What's a green light Team? I'm guessing its not Traffic Related
6.8 is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 07:10 PM   #15
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishbed77
It might, but you won't, so it's a moot question.
I think we have a winner!
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some.
Spats McGee is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 07:27 PM   #16
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
It might, but you won't, so it's a moot question.
Says you. I've seen the Road Warrior. I'm totally going to be a bandit, roaming the postapocalyptic wasteland of Australia with Mel Gibson and armed with a Ruger P95. It'll be just like Thunderdome, but with Flo at my side instead of Tina Turner.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 07:38 PM   #17
SPEMack618
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
You see Tom, while you roam about with your P-95, you won't have any ammo for it because you used it previously trying to hijack an oil tanker full of children or something.

In more serious news, as a P-95 owner, I will attempt to guage chamber support tomorrow before work.

I've shot plenty of various 9mm loads through mine, and a lot of Wolf junk too, and never had the first problem.

The P-95 was my first centerfire pisol, so it will always hold a special place in my heart.
__________________
NRA Life Member
Read my blog!
"The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!"
SPEMack618 is offline  
Old April 24, 2013, 08:10 AM   #18
SIMP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 398
Love my P95. Ugly, heavy, built to last and never fails.
SIMP is offline  
Old April 24, 2013, 08:41 PM   #19
57K
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Location: Heart of Texas
Posts: 788
6.8, Ruger gives complete casehead support in all of their autoloading pistols. The P-95 probably won't be a round too much longer and if I were you, I'd take a hard look at the SR9. It's extremely well built with more slide/frame engagement than any other polymer frame/striker fired pistol. Very comparable to the P-95, IMO, except that the rails midway and at the rear of the pistol are stainless steel. The newer models have an improved trigger mechanism that came from the SR9c. I've had mine for about a month and it came directly from Ruger as a replacement for my used P-89, so I did have to buy the SR9 from them, but it's very recent production. My brother has a P-95 and there are a number of areas where the SR9 is a better pistol, IMO. It's the thinnest double-stack 9mm on the market and I can conceal mine without the need to go to the SR9c. It's thinness gives up nothing in terms of strength and it's fully adjustable sights are the best I've ever seen on a factory autopistol.
57K is offline  
Old April 24, 2013, 09:49 PM   #20
Leejack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: The Alamo!
Posts: 2,056
Ruger has the well earned "built like a tank" reputation.

Some of my favorites are Rugers. Having said that, the old P series tanks were a bit on the ergonomically challenged side, but they do perform.

Had a P90 and loved it, it was the Aircraft carrier of the old P series fleet.
Leejack is offline  
Old April 24, 2013, 10:47 PM   #21
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
Having said that, the old P series tanks were a bit on the ergonomically challenged side, but they do perform.
That they do. Their price makes for a great entry-level pistol, and it's a good one for folks who don't maintain their equipment. I've done a few classes for armored car guys, and I've seen guns so neglected I had to literally cut them out of the holster. It's a good thing the P-series is an almost universal choice for them

Quote:
You see Tom, while you roam about with your P-95, you won't have any ammo for it because you used it previously trying to hijack an oil tanker full of children or something.
Seriously, man. Can't we all just get beyond Thunderdome?
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old April 24, 2013, 11:44 PM   #22
6.8
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2013
Posts: 316
Thanks for the feedback on case support. I'm sure the new Ruger
SR series guns are an improvement. They must have learned a thing or two in 15 years. I know I'm in the minority here, but I like the Looks of the P95 Does mec-gar make a 17rd flush fit mag for it?
6.8 is offline  
Old April 25, 2013, 12:18 AM   #23
Laz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Posts: 1,278
I like the looks of the P95 also, always have. It has a "bulldog pug" look about it. Not at all svelte but very pugnacious. It's dimensions are deceptive and it looks chunkier than it really is.
__________________
Laz

I’m just a nobody, trying to tell everybody, about Somebody, who can save anybody.
Laz is offline  
Old April 25, 2013, 10:23 AM   #24
kflo01
Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 61
I used to own one and its built like a tank. Loved that gun and the sound it made racking the slide. Would get another one at the right price. Only reason I got rid of it was because it was kind of hard for me to reach the docket with my thumb without readjusting my grip. Otherwise it would have been my daily carry 9mm. I sold it on gunbroker and ended up getting a SP2022 in 9mm which I am equally happy with.
__________________
NYS Unrestricted | PA CCP | FL CCP
NRA Member
"Reading,Learning and Doing"
kflo01 is offline  
Old April 25, 2013, 10:59 AM   #25
kflo01
Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 61
Another thing I dont know its just me but I think the gun looks smart. I had the two-toned verison and loved it. Also it actually is more accurate than my SP2022
__________________
NYS Unrestricted | PA CCP | FL CCP
NRA Member
"Reading,Learning and Doing"
kflo01 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08867 seconds with 10 queries