The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 7, 2007, 09:28 AM   #1
Double J
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2007
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 547
H&R .32 Top Break

--I have an old .32 H&R Top Break revolver in the small frame that is 6 shot. It is in need of a new cylinder. But what I'm finding are 5 shot cylinders. Will the parts interchange?
Double J is offline  
Old November 7, 2007, 04:03 PM   #2
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,061
No. You need the same cylinder. The 5 shot cylinder is likely to be narrower and not line its chambers up with the barrel. The hand, which turns the cylinder probably won't advance the new cylinder correctly, either. Indeed, the ejector may have a ratchet enough narrower that the hand doesn't push it at all.

Check your model number on the gun and see if they have the part you want here?
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old November 8, 2007, 11:38 AM   #3
Double J
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2007
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 547
-- Well, that's part of the problem, as the gun is one of the unmarked models. Other than the H&R name/address there is only .32 S&W CRTGE stamped on the left side of the barrel. This may end as a curious garage wall ornament. It's my understanding these were made around 1904-1907, what I believe they called the "NEW" model, but there are no markings to go by.
--External, it resembles the Police, the Premire, or the Hammerless (except it has a hammer). The internals are different, so I'm at a loss of a proper description.
Double J is offline  
Old November 8, 2007, 10:21 PM   #4
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I think the last person to try to figure out H&R's model name and number system jumped off the Tallahatchie bridge. Frankly, I doubt that the gun is worth bothering with, and what you would spend on a new cylinder is probably as much as the gun would be worth with the cylinder.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old November 9, 2007, 11:48 AM   #5
Double J
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2007
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 547
I think you may be right, Jim. It's a shame someone didn't toss in the gun too. I think "jumped" sounds better than "pushed", but yes, I agree.
Double J is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03282 seconds with 10 queries