|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 5, 2012, 02:57 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
opinions on rifles going polymer
hello all.
I was just curious how the current crop of rifle enthusiasts feel about rifles made from polymer. I know I shoot polymer pistols all the time and actually prefer many plastic offerings to a lot of the metal framed handguns out there but with rifles it is a whole other story. case in point http://newfrontierarmory.com/catalog...ducts_id=34089 the cheap son of a gun in me is thinking man it would be nice to have an entire lower half for $100+FFL but something is still pulling me back. for the most part I haven't had much liking for a lot of the more modern rifle designs. I really liked the CX4 but it seems like it would be a pain in the rear to strip down but other than that none of the other designs were really my cup of tea. back to a known platform where there are both metal and polymers being made. are there any practical differences in the durability of a rifle that's made with a plastic lower and one that's made with an alluminum lower?
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
March 5, 2012, 03:17 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
|
When done well, there isn't likely to be much difference.
Not all polymer lowers (say, for AR-15s) have been done well. Newer designs (SCAR, ACR) use polymer receivers and they seem to work well enough. Personally, I tend to stick with what the rifle was designed around- for AR-15s, that's a forged aluminum receiver. If I were going for an ultra lightweight build (not just one that leans lightweight), sure, polymer would be a way to cut that weight down a bit more, but in order for it to matter, you'd need to keep EVERYTHING as light as possible. Saving 7 ounces on the complete lower is pointless when you just go hanging heavy rail systems and other cheap crap off the thing. I also would tend to be suspicious of a complete lower for $100, especially considering quality LPKs alone tend to cost at least $60 or so. That leaves $40 for the stock, receiver extension, action spring, buffer, and receiver itself. For a budget build, sure, but I'm wondering where those corners got cut. Quality polymer costs a good deal to do right- molds and the equipment to make them are quite expensive and recouping that investment means you can't just sell the things for a rock bottom price. I'd really like to see somebody run one of these lowers through a carbine course and see if it holds up. |
March 5, 2012, 03:36 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
I have considered it. looking at the picture in the link it's obvious that everything in that lower is plastic including the trigger. I have been tempted to get one and one of the last remaining 5.45 M&P uppers and shoot a couple crates of 5.45 and slap it around a little for good measure but that would require about $800 once you factor in ammo which is a lot for a gun with a higher than average chance of being mediocre.
at the very least my brother has a whole box of spare spare AR parts in his basement and I still have the old trigger from my accurized AR so I'm sure I could swap broken parts out as I went along too.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
March 5, 2012, 04:51 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 763
|
I know its happening and I have been told some of the benefits but well I guess I'm a bit old fashioned.
I like my handguns to have at least a steel frame and slide. I prefer my ARs to be high quality aluminum... Nothing against those who go polymer though - their choice to make.
__________________
This is who we are, what we do. |
March 5, 2012, 07:10 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 1,358
|
Well, as long as I can get aluminium Palmetto State Armoury lowers for $75 or less...I'll stick with metal
__________________
Marlin Specialist Calico Specialist A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool. |
March 5, 2012, 07:20 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,235
|
Hmmmmm, I get a bunch of budget lowers plus a bunch of budget uppers, a few cans of desert tan paint.... and tada!! I'm in the AR business.
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!! |
March 5, 2012, 08:07 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
|
Polymers have their uses and weight savings are usually good BUT.
Heavier calibers need weight to make them more manageable / tolerable. Some polymers are susceptible to common solvents damaging them beyond repair (see Marlin Camp X trigger guard meltdown). Plastic parts usually wear out faster than metal; parts that come off and on a lot may be better off being metal. Polymer use in firearms has been a good thing when the proper materials are selected and used for the proper application. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|