|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 3, 2012, 12:01 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 26, 2012
Posts: 3
|
1908 DWM-Oberndorf action- question
Hello!
Over the next few years I'd like to build/have built a .243 for long-range shooting. I'm just getting started on this project, and have the opportunity to buy a brazilian-contract 1908 DWM-Oberndorf action. I'd like to know what kind of reputation these actions have, and if it would potentially be a good action for the gun I described (as opposed to, say, similar Mauser actions from a different factory/contract, or some of the Mannlicher actions). The action is currently in a state of dissassembly (so I haven't got around to seeing how smooth it is) and has a few rust spots on the outside, but no pitting. Thoughts, opinions, suggestions? |
June 3, 2012, 02:45 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Make sure it is a M98 pattern and not an 1893. If it is indeed a M98 pattern rifle, then it should work very well. If it is an 1893 pattern, then no.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
June 3, 2012, 03:02 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,283
|
You do it your way,but,if twas me,the 6mm Rem is a necked down 7x57 Mauser.Case taper,how it stacks in the mag,feeds,etc,is made for a mauser.
You can get a .243 to work in a Mauser,but it will take more effort. |
June 5, 2012, 09:28 PM | #4 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Those Model 1908 Brazilian rifles are 98 actions and among the very best.
As to 6mm Remington, I love it, but realistically there is just more support for the .243 in the way of cases, dies, loading data, etc. Either should feed fine through that action. Jim |
June 8, 2012, 03:21 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
The design of the action is not really the issue, it is the metallurgy of the period.
It is not appreciated how fast metal technology advanced from the 1890's to the 1930's, because it is beyond living memory. Ludwig Olsen's warning about using these actions at pressures above the design limits is worth considering. Rifle Magazine Issue 159 May 1995 Dear Editor pg 10 http://www.riflemagazine.com/magazin...159partial.pdf Ludwig Olsen Quote:
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
|
June 8, 2012, 10:17 PM | #6 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I am not sure what the proof load for the 7x57 has to do with the strength of the 98 Mauser action. The proof load pressure is always set at that of the standard load of the cartridge for which the rifle is chambered plus some factor above that. Whether the rifle can or will stand up to a greater pressure was not relevant.
If a 98 Mauser was chambered for, say, the old 8.15x46R (equivalent to the .32-40), it would be proved with the proof load for that round; that it would without doubt be perfectly safe for a round of much greater pressure was beside the point. It seems quite unlikely that any manufacturer would make rifle actions to just barely withstand the proof pressure of the round to be chambered. In fact, except in military contracts, those producing receivers would usually have no way of knowing which of several military or commercial cartridges would ultimately be fired in that receiver. Jim |
|
|