|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 6, 2007, 11:29 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: November 3, 2006
Posts: 23
|
Is it legal to build your own full auto gun with a Class III license?
Is it? I recall hearing that if you have a Class III license you can make an NFA item for your personal use, as long as you don't transfer it to anyone else (since the NFA registry is now closed). So is there any problem with license holders building expedient homemade SMGs or going to a machine shop and making an M16 receiver? Is there a threshold where it becomes illegal for a license holder to simply modify an existing firearm to shoot full auto rather than building one from scratch? Would it be illegal to make a drop-in auto sear (I've seen CAD diagrams for them all over the place) for your AR-15? If you can build your own NFA items with a Class III license, it seems like a good way to economically own automatic guns and teach yourself a useful skill in the meantime.
|
January 6, 2007, 11:34 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
No. A manufacturer may make and/or convert firearms to full automatic, but it must be for his business.
If you are pondering getting the SOT to manufacture full-autos so you can play with machineguns, forget it. It will end up costing more than an existing transferrable machinegun just to get started, then ATF will pounce on you. YOU can manufacture any NFA item you want, except a machinegun, without a license by submitting ATF Form 1's. |
January 7, 2007, 03:54 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: November 3, 2006
Posts: 23
|
So homemade suppressors and sawed-off long guns are good to go as long as you fill out a Form 1? And bombs as well? Interesting.
|
January 7, 2007, 05:29 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
|
January 7, 2007, 11:20 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2000
Location: near Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 790
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Endowment Member FCSA Life Member Subs are cool, but belt-feds RULE! |
|
January 9, 2007, 07:49 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Posts: 4
|
This is a post from the gunsmiths forum http://thegunsmiths.com/phpBB2/ archives which might help answer the question.
A few years ago I had a firearms manufactures license and The local police wanted me to work on their M-16's, I contacted ATF to see what had to be done and I was told to apply for a manufactures license of nfa weapons. the law is a little different now but here is a copy of the rule from atf's site, http://www.atf.treas.gov/firearms/faq/nobackfaq2.htm (M11) How does a person qualify to import, manufacture, or deal in NFA firearms? The person must be licensed under the GCA and pay the required special (occupational) tax imposed by the NFA. In addition, an importer (except importers of sporting shotguns and shotgun ammunition) must also be registered with ATF under the Arms Export Control Act of 1976. After becoming licensed under the GCA, he or she must file ATF Form 5630.7 with the appropriate tax payment in the entire amount with ATF. [26 U. S. C. 5801, 18 U. S. C. 923, 27 CFR 47.31, 178.41, 179.34 and 179.193] (M12) When must firearms special (occupational) taxes be paid, how much are the taxes, and how are they paid? On first engaging in business and thereafter on or before the first day of July, these taxes must be paid in full. The current taxes are set out in the following table. Taxes are paid in the manner discussed in Question M11, above. SPECIAL (OCCUPATIONAL) TAX RATES UNDER THE NFA CLASS OF ANNUAL TAXPAYER FEE 1 Importer of Firearms (Including "Any Other Weapons") $1000.00 2 Manufacturer of Firearms (Including "Any Other Weapons") $1000.00 3 Dealer of Firearms (Including "Any Other Weapons") $ 500.00 4 Importer of Firearms (Including "Any Other Weapons") $ 500.00 REDUCED* 5 Manufacturer of Firearms (Including "Any Other Weapons") $ 500.00 REDUCED* * REDUCED = Rates which apply to certain taxpayers whose total gross receipts in the last taxable year are less than $500,000. ) With the 500.00 license I was able to build 30 different types of full auto rifles and pistols and didn't have to pay tax on them. but when I gave up my licenses I had to destroy them that was the only bitch. This covers the feds but their may be state requirements that also have to be met. My work on the different guns was for R&D work I was trying to design my own selective fire weapon and improve existing systems. |
January 9, 2007, 08:32 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 398
|
You can build your own kit guns without registering them. As long as you don't transfer them. If you make your own AK from a parts kit and bend you own receiver. It won't have a SN and it's still legal. If you buy the lower than it has to be registered and have a SN.
|
January 10, 2007, 12:52 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
|
Just to be more specific on the above post. The guns have to be semi-auto only. Just don't want anyone to get into trouble.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me. |
January 21, 2007, 10:57 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Posts: 379
|
The form 1 has a clause on it to prevent anyone from wasting their time thinking about making a machinegun.
And...you can't assemble a foreign weapon without a certain percentage of US parts... |
January 22, 2007, 10:15 AM | #10 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 6, 2005
Location: Ocean Shores, WA
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
|
|
January 22, 2007, 08:37 PM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: August 3, 2002
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
|
|
March 2, 2007, 04:46 PM | #12 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2007
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
I have a form1 I need to send out, but I'd love to save the hassle(and $200) if possible. |
|
March 2, 2007, 05:13 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
No, a suppressor is still an NFA item. It still requires the $200 tax even if you make and register it on a form 1.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
March 2, 2007, 05:15 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2007
Posts: 3
|
On the form it asks for a serial number. Do I have to make one up and engrave it on the part?
|
March 2, 2007, 05:17 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
yes you do.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
March 2, 2007, 11:32 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me. |
|
March 7, 2007, 06:19 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2006
Location: Amerika's Doyleland
Posts: 809
|
You can assemble a foreign weapon with no regards to 922 if it's a NFA weapon.
|
March 7, 2007, 10:13 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
Since the inactment of the 1968 Gun Control Act, you cannot import NFA items for civilian consumption.
|
March 7, 2007, 10:17 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
|
|
March 18, 2007, 09:36 PM | #20 | |
Member
Join Date: March 6, 2007
Posts: 58
|
gun kit
Quote:
|
|
March 19, 2007, 07:52 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
No, what is being stated here is that if the weapon in question is foreign and registered as NFA, then the other restrictions are trumped and no longer required.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
May 6, 2007, 05:55 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2007
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 141
|
To make an "assault weapon"....
Fill out a form 1 stating your intentions. Get the CLEO signature, Pay the tax.
when it gets back: buy the Parks kit (say a AK-47/SEMI-AUTO ONLY) bend/machine/forge the receiver yourself slap in the parts and the Short-bbl (making it NFA) engrave the serial number you designed/devised. shoot the piss out of it. Its legal. CR 922 says that you have to have so many US made parts in your assult weapons (at least 10 I believe - non-NFA). There is no law (that I know of) that limits a SBR/SBS. Unless you have a 07 FFL/C2 SOT status (FFL = 150.00/3 years & SOT=500/year) you cannot make or convert a SMG! Even then you can only make them for R&D. You CANNOT make them, even with an SOT, for the sole purpose of personal shooting! They HAVE to be made for sale or for R&D. These are called post-sample machine guns, and have to be sold to Law Enforcement or Military UNITS or to other SOT's with a special letter. You can obtain the FFL/SOT from your home. FFLs used for gunsmithing and internet sales do not require the storefront properties. The BATF&E do NOT want people selling guns from their home... not retail at least. A C3 Sot cannot make or import - just sell, a C2 sot can make and sell, cannot import. An Importer can Import and Sell, but not make. home this helps. |
May 6, 2007, 07:42 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
Quote:
There are however, firearms that do not meet the "sporting clause" of the '68 CGA and are therefore not legal for import for civilians. These are the firearms that 922(r) is talking about. ATF has ruled that one way around 922(r) is to create an NFA firearm out of the import, which by definition isn't a sporting firearm.
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer NRA Life Member |
|
May 6, 2007, 09:44 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2007
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 141
|
Correct!!!
That is a great quote BTW!!! Nice play on words!
I use the term Assault Weapon loosly... Although technically the term no longer applies, it still serves to 'relate' particular weapons to a set catagory that the 922r governs. Although there is 'rumored' that our glorious congress has a bill on their docket that would not only re-inact the AW Ban, but also add an additional 30+ weapons to the list, and this time make it perm. If Hillary or Roody gets office this comming term its a pretty safe bet that this law will pass. Both are VERY anti-gun. Out of all the candidates the most firearm friendly one would have to be MaCain. The only down side to him is he flip-flops his views. I Just hope the NRA, as hard working as they are, are prepaired to step up their game in the comming few months. |
May 12, 2007, 09:04 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|