The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 12, 2000, 10:21 PM   #1
Badger Arms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2000
Location: Harnett County, NC
Posts: 1,700
I was wondering if there ever was a design where the barrel on a repeating firearm moved forward and then rearward to work the action? I do know that the Semmerling (sp) pistol has a manually operated forward action. I also read an article about a shotgun -- South African design? -- that utilized a slide action in this manner. My question is if any have been patented, prototyped, or produced that were semi-automatic in nature. It seems to solve many compactness concerns.
Badger Arms is offline  
Old July 13, 2000, 11:00 AM   #2
Coinneach
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: February 23, 1999
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,272
A friend told me about a guy he knew (yes, third-hand info) who designed and built a blow-forward pistol. Turned out it didn't want to go into battery.

When a blowback doesn't go into battery, you smack the back of the slide. Well, with a blow-forward, you smack the front... that is, the muzzle.

Rule 2 comes to mind here.

Boy genius got a slamfire as his pistol went into battery. He's missing some previously-installed components from his hand now.

So, unless you can figure out a way to get a blow-forward design to go into battery 100% of the time, I'd say give it a miss.
Coinneach is offline  
Old July 13, 2000, 10:49 PM   #3
Badger Arms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2000
Location: Harnett County, NC
Posts: 1,700
Good point.
Badger Arms is offline  
Old July 14, 2000, 10:36 AM   #4
cghammo
Member
 
Join Date: April 1, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 52
The 1894 Mannlicher, the Hino-Komuro and the 1908 Schwarzlose are all blow-forward designs. Doesn't appear that they solved any concerns at all.
cghammo is offline  
Old July 16, 2000, 10:20 PM   #5
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The Schwartzlose seems to have been an attempt to circumvent various blowback patents. In practice, there is no advantage to such a design and many disadvantages. One of the problems is how to make the magazine work when the barrel scoops up the round from the front. The blow-forward designers solved the problem, but 'twarn't easy!

Jim
James K is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05893 seconds with 10 queries