|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 12, 2013, 01:11 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2013
Posts: 11
|
film short research(1858/1863pocket/Rogers&Spencer)
I'm doing some research for a film...Which is the 'easiest' (read-most cinematic) to change cylinders, the Remington/Pietta New Model (1858), the Remington/Pietta 1863 Pocket, or the Euroarms Rogers & Spencer? I've handled a New Model Army by Pietta that seemed a little difficult to unlatch the ramrod but not allow it to go into the cylinder, half-cock it so the bottom 'dog' exits the notch in the side of the cylinder, and ? to get the spur to exit the back of the cylinder, all the while trying to pull forward on the 'wedge' of the spindle/shaft of the cylinder...all at the same time??? I've never touched the 1863 Pocket or the Rogers&Spencer.
-Jim ParsleyFarmMotionPictures |
February 12, 2013, 10:01 AM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Any of the 1858 pattern Remington copies can be swapped out in a few seconds, once they are broken in, and once the user knows how to rotate the cylinder into it's position. I can do it by feel with my Uberti copies in about five seconds (if I am not afraid to drop the old cylinder onto a blanket under my feet... it takes as much time to stow the old cylinder as it does to load the new one). Sadly I don't have a two-compartment cylinder pouch as would be needed to do this rapidly and have a place to put the old one.
I am sure you have seen the scene in Pale Rider where Clint Eastwood does this exact thing? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQuKXGOoqUc The key is a double pouch, with one empty compartment to receive the removed cylinder and the other with a prepared cylinder laying in wait. Otherwise you most certainly need three hands, or a pocket that you don't mind getting filthy with black powder residue. NOBODY as far as I know has ever come up with any historical references to this actually being done though... We all just want to look like Clint. If I were setting up a shoot for the screen, first... I would not use Pietta, as the barrel markings will be a giveaway if the lighting is not carefully done or if there are any close up shots. I'd use Uberti. Second, I would not hesitate to take said Uberti and stone a few of the surfaces to slick it up for smoothness. A brand new one will be stiff, and a few thousandths of an inch stoned off of the Hand (the part that rotates the cylinder) makes life a lot easier. A little crocus cloth on the arbor and some valve grinding compound spread on the meshing parts and then cycling it a hundred times before cleaning the valve grinding compound out of the thing will fit the moving parts about the same as a decade of hard use... Willie . |
February 12, 2013, 11:21 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Posts: 566
|
|
February 12, 2013, 11:32 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
^^^ Nice...
Now to load for a half hour... Willie . |
February 12, 2013, 11:54 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
|
Quote:
I find it best to cock the hammer just enough so that both the hammer itself and the hand are withdrawn into the frame of the gun. Then the cylinder drops out freely and installs freely. This is not half-cock but somewhat less than that I think. It can be a bit fiddly to keep the loading ram from dropping into one of the cylinder bores during extraction, but I find it helpful to allow it to do so during re-installation as it helps align the cylinder for the spindle. But this is with an empty cylinder where the ram has someplace to go. This might not be true with a loaded cylinder depending on how deep your balls are set. Steve |
|
February 12, 2013, 12:27 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Leesville SC
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
__________________
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
February 12, 2013, 12:51 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2010
Posts: 211
|
Use a Colt like Little Joe Cartwright about 3 minutes into this clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoIXQ...eature=related |
February 12, 2013, 12:58 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
But another Suggestion is Cimmeron Firearms
Which are just Uberti's... with a small additional marking "Address Cimmaron Fitchberg TX" on the top of the barrel. The Uberti's that Taylors and Stoeger import are identical save for their being no visible external markings. To summarize: Two makers, Pietta and Uberti. One importer of Piettas, and all of them are garishly marked on both sides of the barrel. Three importers of Ubertis, one with a small marking on top of the barrel (Cimmaron) and the other two (Taylors and Stoeger) unmarked. Willie . |
February 12, 2013, 01:22 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
|
Quote:
Steve |
|
February 12, 2013, 02:02 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2010
Posts: 211
|
A Colt shooter could tap the wedge out with the front or side of the loaded cylinder. (Remember this is a gunfight. You won't be worried about scratching your pretty cylinder) A properly setup Colt wedge comes out easily. After swapping cylinders a gentle tap with the empty cylinder resets the wedge. Faster and more elegant than a Remington. Look at the clip again. About 3 min. and 30 sec. into it Hoss is fumbling with his clunky Remington. Who wants to see that?
|
February 12, 2013, 02:39 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
|
Yeah, till you drop that wedge and it falls into a crack in the floorboards!
Who wants to take their gun to pieces to load it? Steve |
February 12, 2013, 02:53 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2010
Posts: 211
|
A properly setup Colt retains the wedge with the wedge spring and screw. My experience with Remingtons (both original & repos) is that a hammer is required to remove the cylinder pin due to fouling. A spare cylinder is worthless if you can't get the empty one out.
|
February 12, 2013, 04:15 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Leesville SC
Posts: 2,653
|
Sitting in my favorite chair with an Orville Redenbacher's pop bag of popcorn. Reading another episode of Colt vs. Remington!!
__________________
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson |
February 12, 2013, 04:16 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2013
Posts: 11
|
1863 pocket
Would the 1863 pocket be exactly the same to swap cylinders as the 1858? Also, on the Rogers & Spencer...Is it similar? I thought I read that it has a screw to turn out to swap. Anyone know how long that would take?
|
February 12, 2013, 04:23 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Leesville SC
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
__________________
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
February 12, 2013, 05:56 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2010
Posts: 211
|
Little Joe was a Colt man. Hoss was a Remington guy. I don't know about you guys but when Bonanza was in first run I wanted to be like Little Joe. All the girls liked him. Hoss, not so much.
|
February 12, 2013, 07:03 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
A Colt wedge pops in and out with thumb pressure.
|
February 12, 2013, 07:31 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 223
|
Let me muddy this up
I'd say the Starr revolver is quicker to swap cylinders than either a Remmie or a Colt.
|
February 13, 2013, 05:40 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
|
I think Adam has a 1860 Colt Richards conversion in this clip.
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8 |
February 13, 2013, 05:48 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
|
I think Adam has a 1860 Colt Richards conversion in this clip.
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8 |
February 13, 2013, 07:24 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: High Desert Mountains CA.
Posts: 410
|
Tell us more about your movie plans....
|
February 13, 2013, 08:01 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 353
|
I gotta agree on the Starr being the easiest, it was designed to be. But my favorite gun, the Rogers and Spencer can be the easiest to swap cylinders on out of the other 3 choices. For one thing, bp NEVER fouls the cylinder pin because of the bushing on the front of the cylinder and with a slight modification, you can line up the cylinder pin retaining screw as fast as fast (see pic). When the lever soldered on the screw is turned counter clockwise, it stops on the projecting pin and you're good to go. The only problem is that if you pull it out too far the entire cylinder pin and loading lever assembly comes out when removing the cylinder...just takes some practice not to do that.
|
February 13, 2013, 11:40 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
Here is a potential alternative...
Check out Duelist's video on the 1866 Remington Revolver Carbine. In that video, Mike pulls the cylinder on that carbine, which is essentially an 1858 Remington with about the max smoothness I have ever seen. Almost like Eastwood in Pale Rider (Different revolver, but still quite smooth)
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
February 14, 2013, 03:50 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: High Desert Mountains CA.
Posts: 410
|
@ Smokin Joe:
Looks like Lil' Joe was reloading a cartridge conversion Colt... |
February 14, 2013, 08:07 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2010
Posts: 211
|
Could be but it's still an open top Colt.
|
Tags |
1858 , 1863 , remington , rogers , spencer |
|
|