|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 25, 2013, 06:01 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 437
|
.22-250, .243, .30-06: One to do them all?
I'm starting to reload for the .22-250 and was wondering if there was a powder (not Varget, can't find it) that would work well in all three? As of now I'm thinking my best bet would be IMR4064, IMR4350, or IMR4895. Bullet weights will be 50-55gr in the .22-250, 85-100 in the .243, and 165gr in the .30-06. Any thoughts guys? Thanks for any helpful advice in advance!
|
September 25, 2013, 06:11 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 8, 2000
Posts: 2,101
|
I sold my 22-250, so can't be much help with it. However, I picked up an 8# jug of H-4350 to cover the others you mention. I mostly shoot 90 - 100gr loads in my .243's and 130 - 165 in my .308 and 30-06's. The Hodgdon is a slight bit slower and I get great groups and plenty of velocity from my 22'ish inch barrels.
Not knowing much of the load data with the 250 I can't say for certain but with the other two if all you have is the IMR version of 4350 I would give it a good run through and see how it works for you.
__________________
LAter, Mike / TX |
September 25, 2013, 06:41 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2006
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 705
|
IMR 3031, H 4895, IMR 4064..... any of these would work.
|
September 25, 2013, 07:40 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2012
Location: N.central Pa.
Posts: 302
|
Lee 2nd has quite a few loads for all three using H4350. It works great in my .243
__________________
Gun control means: Being able to hit what you are shooting at. |
September 25, 2013, 07:52 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 157
|
Take a look at loads for H414 / Win 760. Speed is similar to 4350, so it should do well. Being spherical powders, they also meter well. Loads are identical between H414 and Win 760 too.
|
September 25, 2013, 08:21 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
|
2 powders come to mind real fast--4064 and H4895, Both powders will work . Best of the 2 would be 4064
__________________
NRA Certified RSO NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional |
September 25, 2013, 10:03 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 437
|
Thanks guys! Revisiting my manuals and trying to find some common ground. I'm kind of a minimalist when it comes to rifle powders. Until now, I just have been able to use Varget for everything, but since I still can't find it, I'm branching out a bit. Looks like some good suggestions. I RE-discovered the powder chart in the Lee Manual and am beginning to see how useful that one is.
Keep the suggestions coming! |
September 25, 2013, 11:28 PM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,795
|
Any medium rate rifle powder will work. Those on the slower end will not work as well for some loading as those on the faster end, and vice versa.
Your problem as a minimalist is that you may not find a powder that shoots acceptably well in all three rifles. Seriously, I have seen rifles that don't seem to care what you load them with, rifles that do poorly with one powder and fine with everything else, and rifles that will only perform their best with a specific kind of powder. You've got 3 rifles, its possible you could have one of each of these types. Or any other possible combination. They only way you can find out is by loading and shooting and keeping track of which one does what.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
September 26, 2013, 12:06 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 437
|
I accept those facts AMP. So far though in the past few years of reloading, is that I get acceptable performance with Varget in a .223, .243, and .30-06. Now I added a second .243 as well as a .22-250. I haven't loaded for the two newest yet, but time will tell if I have a picky one in my racks. Thanks for explaining that out. I'm branching out though, so when the day comes that I DO get a picky one, I'll have some different powders to try!
|
September 26, 2013, 11:56 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 437
|
Ended up buying a pound of each H414 and IMR4064 to try. That was about all the rifle powders I could find at both Cabela's and Scheels.
|
September 26, 2013, 01:19 PM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,795
|
I've been reloading since the early 70s, and am currently set up to load for over 30 different rifle and handgun rounds, ranging from .22 Hornet to .458 Win mag.
I've never had really bad results with any suitable powder, but in some guns, some powder are just mediocre, and others really shine. IMR 4064 is an old and trusted friend to me, along with many others. Good place to start, and good standby as well. The only down side to the stick type powders is sometimes they don't meter smoothly in the powder measure. Ball and flake types meter like water, usually. "Overbore" cases (large capacity vs bore size cases) often turn in their highest velocities with slower powders. Accuracy, of course is dependent on the individual rifle, and its load preferences. The .22-250 and the .243 are on the overbore side of things. You may get a benefit from the slower powders in these cases, you may not. Again, individual rifle preference. I generally use medium rate powders in these calibers (IMR 4064, 4320, WW 748, etc.) and have been getting very acceptable results for decades. IMR 4895 is my go to powder for all the WWII milsurp calibers, and certain Hodgon and Hercules powders are very useful as well. H380 was intended for the .22-250 and the classic load (38gr w/55gr bullet) has been very popular for a long time. The current situation of on the shelf powder (and everything else) availability truly sucks. Get what you can, try it. When you can find something else, try that. You may find a wonder powder that works really well in everything you have. You may not. Either way, you get to shoot to find out, and that's never a totally bad thing, right? Good Luck, and if I can be of any help, just ask.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
September 26, 2013, 01:27 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
RL17 works great for a .243, OK in a 30-06, and barely OK in a .223 (a little too slow unless you have a really long barrel).
|
September 26, 2013, 02:32 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,422
|
There have been many suitable suggestions above, but the first powder that popped into my head was...
H380 The 4064 you picked up should also work fairly well.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
September 26, 2013, 03:01 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 437
|
Thanks AMP, always a ton of good information in your posts! I'll maybe get to try these powders out next week if I get some reloading done tomorrow or Saturday between shifts at work.
FrankenMauser, I was dead set and ready to try a pound of H380, but none was available. So I went with two others that were on my list to look for. I'll be set for awhile now! Thanks for the suggestions guys! Always a ton of good information from people with experience different from my own. |
September 26, 2013, 03:14 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
IMr4064. It's got the best track record for accuracy in those cartridges. IMR4350 may be best for the .243 with heavy bullets.
|
September 26, 2013, 03:17 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2008
Posts: 803
|
H414 or H380 were the first two that popped into my little pea brain.
|
September 27, 2013, 07:24 PM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2013
Posts: 7
|
4350 seems to be the king of powders for my 25-06' which is in the middle of your group. 4064 also appears to be near universal.
Good luck! |
September 28, 2013, 01:20 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Posts: 330
|
I like IMR 4064, but getting them big kernels into 22's (even with a long tube) is slow. Never tried it in all of those mentioned, but H380 sounds good. And it flo-o-ows.
__________________
"I should have picked alcohol, drugs, or beating my wife..." Pete Rose |
September 28, 2013, 03:32 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,804
|
In general I don't think trying to use 1 powder for several very different chamberings is a good idea. It may work great in one, but rarely will give more than mediocre performance in the others. Especially with stuff as different as these. Buying 3 different containers of powder costs exactly the same and lasts exactly the same number of loadings as 3 containers of the same powder in the long run. And will result in great performance from all 3 instead of great performance in one and mediocre performance in the other 2.
|
September 28, 2013, 06:57 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Location: Mid TN
Posts: 26
|
Since you cannot find Varget...
Benchmark IMR 4064 I don't load for 22-250 but these two powders work well in multiple other calibers I load for. |
September 28, 2013, 10:03 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 157
|
I agree with the posts suggesting that one will be hard pressed to 'get by' with just one powder across the board.
Having acknowledged that, the OP indicated that he is just starting on a particular caliber. Starting with a single powder that is 'adequate' but not superior for all of the calibers and bullet weights under consideration for the starting the learning process is a good practice. Get the experience and the multiple powder bug WILL bite. The advantage to starting with a single powder is that one will have fewer canisters of poor choices aging in the powder locker. |
September 28, 2013, 10:06 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
|
H-4895 will work for all three.
Jim
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum |
September 29, 2013, 11:27 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 437
|
JASmith nailed it! I get accuracy that exceeds any factory ammo that I've tried with (up until now) one powder. No deer is going to notice the difference between a 1" group compared to a 0.5" group that took me a lot of time to find. For the hunting accuracy I demand, one powder to cover everything works well for me without me spending a lot of time and monetary resources into a bunch of different powders. Besides, living in a small apartment I don't have the space for a powder cabinet yet. Someday though. Thanks guys for the suggestions and experience sharing!
|
September 30, 2013, 08:21 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Posts: 434
|
I don't have a 30.06, but IMR 4064 shoots accurately in my .22-250 and in my .243. H4895 would be another great choice, but if it were me and I could pick just one, it would be IMR 4064. H380 is another choice that should work well across the board, but particularly in the larger calibers it might give up some accuracy, plus you want to run Magnum primers with it in most cases.
|
October 1, 2013, 08:46 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2000
Location: Colombia, SC
Posts: 745
|
Accurate 4350 with the 64 gr Winchester PP bullet worked just fine in my 22/250. Actually better than fine, it killed coyotes like the hammer of Thor and shot some of the best groups I ever shot from that rifle. I think only the Speer 52 gr could beat it by a little.
__________________
I don't have time for busy people |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|