|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 17, 2013, 08:31 PM | #26 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
LA Times, Dormer; federal govt-tyrants ...
I'd add that it's already documented in some states like CA & FL that gun sales/ownership has increased but violent crime rates have DECREASED!
Clyde Last edited by ClydeFrog; February 17, 2013 at 08:42 PM. |
February 17, 2013, 08:37 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 237
|
Re: WSJ: Why Our Gun Debate is Off Target
Quote:
Believe it or not, those people are not necessarilarly our opponents. And we push them away at our peril. We could do the lighten up and do ourselves some good. But as far as other organizations go, they do not have to compete. They can compliment. The American Medical Association does not compete with the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. They compliment one another nicely. Yes, the NRA needs to be more inclusive and grow substantially. But it needs to not feel threatened by other groups. Last edited by mrbatchelor; February 17, 2013 at 11:19 PM. |
|
February 17, 2013, 11:28 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
I read the article this morning... All in all, I thought it was good, and it was good for the WSJ primary audience to hear it.
The author asks that gun owners exert peer pressure on those of us who are unsafe or careless... But that has been exactly my experience. Gun owners DO exert peer pressure to promote safe and responsible ownership. I have witnessed it several times... I myself had to remind some dit-ship a few years ago that his Ruger 10/22 was not a toy, I was afraid he was going to shoot one of his kids (!!!) But I think the author heaps too much blame and responsibility onto gun owners. He asks us to self-police ourselves... But a few pages later I read that 4000 pedestrians are killed every year by cars.... So why are drivers not being asked to police themselves better? Under that logic, any racial/ethnic group could be held morally responsible for the behavior of a few, and we could ask them to do a better job policing themselves. If a gun owner does not keep his guns locked up, and burglar steals them, well, bad on him. That gun owner bears some moral responsibility. But is the entire gun-owning population somehow to blame because we did not properly shame the guy into buying a gun safe? Really? Jim |
February 18, 2013, 12:07 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 237
|
WSJ: Why Our Gun Debate is Off Target
Quote:
But I would point out that the prevailing attitude among the gun community has been "it's not my responsibility what those damned KRIMINALS do. Now get off my lawn, punk." And while it's true we aren't responsible for the actions of the criminals, we have to all live in this society together. We had darn well better participate in the solution or we'll get handed a solution. And I'll bet we won't like that. So we must, *MUST* begin engaging the non-shooting, non-gun owning population in positive ways. Not necessarily the hard core antis, but the uncommitted. |
|
February 18, 2013, 12:38 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
|
February 18, 2013, 06:01 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I really don't understand the stereotype about the NRA always backing Republicans, either. I can think of several high profile elections where that was not the case.
But I do notice amazing similarities in the responses from gun control advocates in Congress, whose party begins with D. It seems like somebody provided a template and handed it out throughout the party. |
February 18, 2013, 03:26 PM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: January 21, 2009
Location: Nevada Desert
Posts: 84
|
Bart Roberts re: Reed
Harry Reed was accompanied by LaPierre to open the Clark County Gun Range before that election. If that isn't a declarative "endorsment" I don't know what is. The NRA can blather all it wants about who it endorses, but ACTIONS (yes i know i'm not supposed to use caps) are what matter. Yes I'm a life member of the NRA, that does in no way indicate that I believe that they are always, or even mostly, correct in their actions.
|
February 18, 2013, 03:52 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
|
Rep. John Barrow (D-GA-12) got the NRA endorsement in the past election and an A rating.
He's a good man and takes a hard line position on gun rights. In fact, he got targeted for a hatchet job by one of the anti- groups who edited a campaign commercial of his to make it like he was a gun nut.
__________________
NRA Life Member Read my blog! "The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!" |
February 18, 2013, 06:46 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,435
|
The author seems to misinterpret, overestimate, or simply have his facts wrong in a number of areas.
The author first addresses accidental death and suicide by firearm among children and adolescents. The way the author writes the article, we would be had to believe that firearm accidents and suicides are of epidemic proportion. This, however, does not bear out when one examines the numbers. According to the National Center for Health Statistics (part of the CDC), as of 2007 accidental death by firearm among children age 0-19 years (138 per 100,000) is well behind motor vehicle accidents (6,683), drowning (1,056), fires/burns (544), poisoning(972), and suffocation/strangulation (1,263). When it comes to suicide, the author points out that firearms are the most popular and effective means used in the U.S. While that statement is not overtly false, it is misleading. While the majority of successful suicides in the United States are by firearm, the majority of attempted suicides are not successful. This is primarily because of the different methods chosen by males as opposed to females. Males are more likely to choose a firearm to commit suicide and, as such, are more often successful. Females, while less likely to actually die from suicide, are much more likely to attempt suicide. Moreover, one would think that because firearms are among the most effective means of suicide that the United States would be near the top of the list of countries with the highest suicide rates due to the easy availability of guns in the U.S. Such, however, is not the case as the U.S. ranks 34th in the world for suicide rate which is well behind other industrialized nations with far less availability of firearms including Russia, China, Japan, and France. This would seem to suggest that people who wish to take their own lives choose whatever means is available to them. As such, we cannot conclude that restrictions on the availability of firearms would necessarily reduce the U.S. suicide rate. The author further points out that many of the guns used in crimes are stolen with the implication that had the owners of said guns stored them more securely, these thefts would not have occurred. The author makes some pretty big assumptions here the primary being that the majority of the guns stolen were not securely stored. Different types of storage devices offer differing levels of security. An inexpensive gun safe might prevent a child or "smash and grab" thief form accessing its contents, but a determined thief with a moderate amount of time and simple hand tools could gain access quite easily. Likewise, other safe storage devices such as trigger locks and portable safes only prevent immediate access to the firearm. A thief could simply make off with the whole kit and caboodle so that he can access the firearm at his leisure later. Likewise, the author also assumes that all or nearly all of the reported thefts were indeed thefts. There are a number of reasons why a person might falsely report a gun stolen including insurance fraud and to cover up the sale of a gun to a known prohibited person both of which are already illegal. Furthermore, the author cites that a large percentage of crime guns were believed to be "probably stolen" by the criminals. This would seem to suggest that the criminal acquired the firearm from another criminal such as a fence, drug dealer, or drug user and simply assumed that it was stolen. The problem is that there are several other means by which a criminal can obtain a firearm including straw purchase, illegal purchase or gift from a friend or family member, or in trade for drugs or other illicit goods. The author also cites "tens of thousands" of shootings by people who previously had no criminal record. Since the author neither provides an exact figure nor cites a source, we can only assume that the number of people who suddenly snap and shoot someone is between 10,000 and 99,999. If we're extremely generous and assume that every year 100,000 people suddenly snap and commit a violent crime with a gun, that still only gives us 0.1% of the 100,000,000 gun owners that the author cites. When we contrast this to the 1,246,248 violent crimes in 2010 for a population of 308,745,538, we find that violent criminals represent 0.4% of the total population. Finally, the author mentions so-called "safe storage" laws and brags about his own $25 gun safe. Where the author goes awry here is that he assumes that what is an adequate level of access or security for one person would be adequate for another. For example, his toaster-sized $25 safe would probably be adequate to keep a curious child away from his gun, but not a determined burglar. Conversely, a gun owner whose only weapon is a rifle or shotgun cannot store his/her firearm with the same degree of security while maintaining such easy access. Overall, I think the main mistake that the author makes is to assume that those wishing to enact ever more restrictive gun laws can be placated through self-policing of the gun-owning community. The anti's continue to push for more and more draconian gun laws despite the continuing decline of violent crime and the lack of effect that gun control laws have upon it. Even the author admits that the gun-owning community is by and large very responsible. Despite this, the gun grabbers continue to latch on to isolated incidents to further their arguments. I see no reason to believe that such people can be appeased nor that they want anything short of a total ban on private firearm ownership. Last edited by Webleymkv; February 19, 2013 at 11:31 AM. |
February 19, 2013, 09:43 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
Well said Webley... you should write to the WSJ, they do publish insightful letters.
|
February 19, 2013, 04:53 PM | #36 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
The WSJ guy sounds like an idiot to me. Here's why:
Quote:
Quote:
I'll have to read some more about Baum, but if what the OP states is truly representative, the guy sounds like a real dummy. PS: Mr. Baum, you are free to come here and debate me, show me where I'm all wrong about you. Last edited by Skans; February 19, 2013 at 05:04 PM. |
||
February 19, 2013, 05:48 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
|
Seems like the author interviewed like minded people such as Ridge Runner when doing research for his book. How many othe like minded folks did he chat it up with?
I don't call the NRA extreme. Only people who want to ban, confiscate, or severly restrict citizen access to guns consider the NRA extreme. If they are extreme in any way, they are extreme in the sense that they know the road that politicians are traveling and where it leads. Hence, they might be considered extreme. I call the NRA extremely perceptive. The author basically suggested that lawful gun owners are at fault for gun violence by their casual treatment of firearms in their homes. This leads to kids getting access to guns when they shouldn't or guns being stolen. He goes on to say that gun owners don't want to tell the police when they have a gun stolen. I told the police when it happened to me, but I didn't turn in an insurance claim. I think I was pretty responsible. He suggests that gun shops should not sell a gun unless the owner has a way to restrict access. I think that is none of his business and it certainly is not the government's business. Does he want US law enforcement entering people's homes to inspect their gun safes?? Oops, this one is loaded and not in the safe... write him up. That may lead to many bad situations that most don't want to consider as honest citizens. The article blames gun owners. Why is a gun owner responsible if a kid commits suicide? Has his home robbed? Is robbed at gun point on the street? Or assaulted on the street or in their homes??? The bad guys are responsible. When he said he was liberal. He was right. He can do what he wants to with his firearms, but stay the hell out of my life and my business! Last edited by 22-rimfire; February 19, 2013 at 06:36 PM. |
February 20, 2013, 12:39 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,292
|
Webley - Very clearly written and well thought out.
IMhO there are some real insights there in your article and if you or anyone else claim it's just 'common sense' I'd reply it's just the antidote we all need to counter a lot of the nonsense that's being put out by much of the news media. I like reading articles like this and the one written by Larry Correia. |
February 20, 2013, 02:51 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 237
|
WSJ: Why Our Gun Debate is Off Target
|
February 20, 2013, 06:18 AM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Article had some points to it but the supposition that all gun owners bear some responsibility for all the gun related crimes is about as retarded a statement as I've ever heard. That's like saying that cause I'm a man and men do most of the raping, I must bear some of the blame for those raped.
Don't think so, scooter. |
February 20, 2013, 07:06 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Webley:
Thanks for a very well written post. |
February 20, 2013, 08:39 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,435
|
Quote:
|
|
February 20, 2013, 11:49 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 237
|
Re: WSJ: Why Our Gun Debate is Off Target
Around here yes. Audience appropriate terms prevail.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|