|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 21, 2000, 04:28 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 1999
Posts: 171
|
I'm thinking of getting this new Kydex/Concealex IWB holster which is similar to the Mitch Rosen "Workman." I plan to use it for my S&W 442 J-frame. It is designed to allow the shirtail to be tucked in between the belt and the gun, covering everything but the belt loop.
I tried the Galco version in a store once and literally could not draw the handgun, due to a combination of the depth of the holster, the tight fit and the added resistance of the belt. If anyone has tried the Blade-Tech, I would appreciate hearing how it works. |
January 21, 2000, 10:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 1999
Location: Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Posts: 3,624
|
Yes, I have a Blade-Tech "UCH" tuckable for a Glock 27. It works great. Drawing and re-holstering are both easy. Not sure if revolver would work just as well or not. Hope this helps.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|