|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 19, 2013, 01:15 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
Around here there have been instances where a person has been run off the road and shot as well and things of that nature which prompted the decision. The state law is quite clear on what I can do with it (It has to be in a container where a lid or restraining device has to be removed, including a snap-on holster) although it's a great point that I should figure out a way to secure it when I won't be in the car and fully think through all of the responsibilities and possibilities.
|
March 19, 2013, 02:28 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,629
|
if you acknowledge that mak is better because it could be stolen from your care, you acknowledge a gun can be stolen from your car.
That is admitting an irresponsible decision. blah blah blah, it's your right. Got it. but you should be responsible to others too. |
March 19, 2013, 07:43 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
I think that's why they were advising me to re-think that method of carry or revise it and make sure I've taken good security measures first.
|
|
|