The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 8, 2007, 06:33 PM   #1
SLOMountaineer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 23, 2006
Posts: 238
Differences in reloading manuals for same bullet

I am loading some .308 with Speer 110gr HP and Hodgdon H322. I have a Speer, Hodgdon, and Hornady manual. I prefer the Hornady manual and use it most of the time but I do cross-reference with the others. Here is my dilemma...they give much different recommendations:

Hornady Starting: 42.8-2900fps
Max: 47.2-3200fps

Speer: 37.0-2495
41.0-2794 (With a note: Velocities should be held to under 2900fps with this bullet) My box doesn't say "Varminter" but the Speer manual lists them as "Varminter". I checked Speers site and they only list one 110gr .30 rifle bullet so maybe I just have an older box before they put the "varminter" label on it.

Hodgdon: 43.0-2965
46.0-3229


Why the differences? I haven't checked other bullets/calibers yet. Whose manual should I go by?
SLOMountaineer is offline  
Old February 8, 2007, 08:40 PM   #2
Rimrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Behind enemy lines
Posts: 1,309
The Hornady book is using Hornady bullets, you aren't so set it aside for now.

The Hodgdon book is using their powder with a Speep SP bullet, which isn't the bullet you are using, plus if you look at the COL they listed, it is longer than any Speer 110 gr load listed in the Speer manual. So set it aside for now.

Speer has the bullet you are using, my manual list 4 110 gr bullets, and data specific to it. It is listed seperate from the other 110 gr bullets due to the velocity restriction they placed on it. Use this data to start your loading.
Rimrod is offline  
Old February 8, 2007, 09:40 PM   #3
SLOMountaineer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 23, 2006
Posts: 238
Thanks. I haven't reloaded for several years and just pulled my equipment out and dusted it off. As soon as I read your post it all came back to me. Don't worry, I won't blow myself up or anything. It isn't quite like getting on a bicycle after a few years.

Thanks also for not calling me an idiot.
SLOMountaineer is offline  
Old February 8, 2007, 10:37 PM   #4
Bullet94
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 723
I believe an idiot would be someone with a question that they didn’t ask.
__________________
PRO-SECOND AMENDMENT - Live Free or Die
Bullet94 is offline  
Old February 9, 2007, 12:00 AM   #5
Rimrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Behind enemy lines
Posts: 1,309
I can't call you an idiot, that's the guy my wife is married too. At least that's what she says.
Rimrod is offline  
Old February 9, 2007, 01:37 AM   #6
SLOMountaineer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 23, 2006
Posts: 238
LOL! Same thing for the guy my wife is married to.
SLOMountaineer is offline  
Old February 12, 2007, 01:59 AM   #7
trooper3385
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 814
I was kind of wondering the same thing too. On the bottle of Varget that I have, it recommends for a 308, 46 gr with the 168 gr Sierra Match Kings. In the Lyman 48th ed. that I have, it says that the max load is 45.7 for the 168 gr Sierra Match Kings. ?????
trooper3385 is offline  
Old February 12, 2007, 12:54 PM   #8
Rimrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Behind enemy lines
Posts: 1,309
Trooper,

Looking at the Hodgdon manual and the Lyman #48, Hodgdon has a very slightly longer OAL, and the Lyman lists a higher pressure at their max. There are variables in the testing that may not be apparent or even explainable. This is why the manuals tell you to start lower than max and work your way up slowly.
Rimrod is offline  
Old February 12, 2007, 08:08 PM   #9
Don H
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2000
Location: SLC,Utah
Posts: 2,704
Different companies use differing components and different fixtures to develop the pressures. Thus the loads vary.
Don H is offline  
Old February 13, 2007, 02:14 AM   #10
amamnn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2006
Location: WA, the left armpit of the USA
Posts: 1,323
I think, if you find an apparent conflict, you'd be best served by using the data in the bullet makers' manuals than powder makers' listings. The bullet makers have a better sense of how the bullet bears on the neck and so on. I've seen some of the testing methods in use and have seen a bit of how much testing is actually accomplished by both.
__________________
"If the enemy is in range, so are you." - Infantry Journal
amamnn is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07007 seconds with 8 queries