The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 11, 2008, 04:43 PM   #1
PUP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2008
Posts: 8
Lilja tight bore rimfire barrel?

I am looking at purchasing a lilja tight bore 22 rimfire barrel blank to build a heavy barrel for my remington 504.
Has anyone had any experinces with these barrels.
PUP is offline  
Old March 11, 2008, 05:52 PM   #2
Bolosniper
Member
 
Join Date: September 10, 2005
Location: Dillon, Montana
Posts: 70
Dan Lilja makes a very good and competitive 22 rimfire barrel. It is a 4 groove, tight bore configuration that has been very successful.
__________________
Mike McIntyre
VP Operations
MPI Rifles, LLC
[URL=http://www.mpirifles.com]
Bolosniper is offline  
Old March 12, 2008, 12:44 AM   #3
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Lilja 22LR match barrels have tighter bores than most 22 cal barrels (.218" IIRC). They shoot very well.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old March 12, 2008, 05:06 AM   #4
Martyn4802
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2007
Location: Grayling, Michigan
Posts: 737
One of my shooting buddies up here had a Lilja tight bore 22 Rimfire barreled rifle built by Butch Hongisto that was a screamer. He won lots of matches with it, including shooting a 248 on the RBA target at 50 yards. The RBA target is the most difficult of all 22 Rimfire targets to shoot having a .10" diameter 10 ring.

Martyn
__________________
US Army Retired
NRA Benefactor Life Member
JPFO
Martyn4802 is offline  
Old March 12, 2008, 06:59 AM   #5
PUP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks for the info. It makes me more confident about this choice.What chamber reamer would be best?
PUP is offline  
Old March 12, 2008, 12:06 PM   #6
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
What chamber reamer would be best?
Match chamber. If you are going to have a tight bore, you need a tight chamber for best results.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old March 12, 2008, 01:24 PM   #7
PUP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2008
Posts: 8
What match chamber is best?
I have found at least six different ones.
The rifle will be built on a remington 504 action and will be used for indoor
50FT and outdoor 50YRD and 100YRD three position heavy rifle competitions.

Last edited by PUP; March 12, 2008 at 03:49 PM.
PUP is offline  
Old March 12, 2008, 07:52 PM   #8
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Pick up a copy of Precision Shooting and write to Bill Calfee via the editor. Bill has built quite a number of the top prize winning .22 bench guns, and likes the Lilja barrels. He could probably recommend a chamber for you based on your action with that barrel. I know he likes to burnish his chambers after cutting, with a special tool. It is also worth going back over past issues of PS to learn how he slugs the .22 blanks to figure out which end will be the muzzle and which the chamber, and also how much to cut off the blank at each end? Besides, his folksy writing style makes for an extremely entertaining read.

Regarding the tight barrel, a lot of cast bullet shooters find they need the hard cast bullets about 0.002" to 0.003" over groove diameter for best rifle accuracy, rather than the traditional 0.001" over. It's a statistical observation, not a theoretical notion, and nobody knows why that should be true, just that it can be measured to be so. With the softer swaged lead in the RF it makes sense that number could be bigger. Certainly the soft lead squeezes into the barrel pretty easily, and I expect Dan Lilja has come up with his groove diameter just as empirically as the cast bullet guys came up with their bullet oversizing number. That's good. It means it works based on test experience rather than theory, also.

If you don't want to wait for Calfee's response, ask Lilja. He probably knows what Calfee is using.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old March 13, 2008, 07:03 AM   #9
PUP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks for all the info. It is very helpful.
PUP is offline  
Old March 13, 2008, 08:57 AM   #10
johnbt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
He's working on an article for Precision Shooting according to what he's said on BRC. As far as reamers, I can't remember all of the details scattered throughout his posts. For instance, see post #26 at http://www.benchrest.com/forums/show...t=48126&page=2

(Note that he has others post his comments for him, but he signs them.)

That reminds me, I need to renew my 2-year subscription to PS.

John
johnbt is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04529 seconds with 10 queries