November 26, 2012, 08:55 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: September 30, 2012
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 32
|
Load data manuals
I have another thread going and notice someone had other load data lower than mine in the lee book is. Picked up a Lyman Friday and most of the load data is lower on some and oal and diameters are lower. Who do you follow when it comes to load data?
__________________
Iowa Hawkeyes |
November 26, 2012, 11:44 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
|
I like the Lyman Thursday.
Sent from my HTCEVOV4G using Tapatalk 2 |
November 27, 2012, 07:01 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Djmudge, rarely, if at all, does everyone use the same lot of powder, primer, case and barrel with the same pressure and velocity measuring stuff to test a given load. Until that happens, there'll be at least a 5% spread in load data; sometimes a 10% spread.
|
November 27, 2012, 08:34 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,084
|
Many component manufactures build there own "Recipe" book for their bullets, like Hornady, Speer, Nozler etc.
These manuals list their test equipment like Bart point's out. Your equipment may not be just like theirs and that is why we all start a load that is at a low end of the recipe and test fire watching for signs of High Pressure, and of course how well they group. If we try out a new fangled bullet that is of a different weight and shape and it's not in our manual we may look in another and find one very close. Then starting at a low end and work up. There are also resources here on the web and that is good but your good manual's are just so important for reference. So is this Forum!
__________________
Gbro CGVS For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18 |
November 27, 2012, 09:08 AM | #5 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
The safest thing to do is check at least 3 official sources, start at the lowest starting load and work up to the lowest max. In the real world, most folks work toward the highest max.
Load manuals are for reference only. You might run into a starting load that is actually max in your gun with your components. This should be rare but it does happen. You might also find max loads that are below starting loads in another book, this is actually not all that rare. The Lyman 49th, on page 57, shows that changing nothing but primers in a .308Win load can make a difference of 2,600psi. That's about 5%, all by itself. Considering that every component you use is different than theirs, it's quite understandable that different manuals have different suggestions. |
November 27, 2012, 09:30 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2009
Location: nw wyoming
Posts: 1,061
|
I follow my gun only.
The book is a basic, general starting point, nothing more. You have to go by YOUR gun to get the best performance. |
November 27, 2012, 09:40 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
reloader28 said:
Quote:
|
|
November 27, 2012, 09:54 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
As others have said its the variation in components & equipment that you're seeing. Sometimes it can be quite large.
My usual advice is to look a little deeper than just the load tables. There is usually some kind of preface or intro to the load. I look at this first & allopcate a priority from several manuals, giving preference for the closest match for components & equipment to what I'm actually loading. AS an example I was working up some loads for a 6" revolver. One of the sources had highger velocities than any of the others, looking at the equipment used it had a 10" pressure barrel in a universal reciever. I ignored that data.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 27, 2012, 10:48 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2009
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 1,569
|
Manuals.
In the words of Capt. Barbossa: "...And thirdly, the code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules. Welcome aboard the Black Pearl, Miss Turner."
__________________
A lack of planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an emergency on my part. Last edited by serf 'rett; November 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM. |
November 27, 2012, 11:19 AM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
I start with powder manufacturer data. It's all online and easy to get. Next would be bullet manufacturer data if available and I need more info. Last would be the manuals. I work form the middle up or down depending.
|
November 27, 2012, 11:40 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 1,074
|
Bart B covered it pretty well, when opening/starting with a new lot number of the same number powder I begin at the starting load. Many years ago I found the starting load for H4895 to be a more than max load in my 30/06, rare, but it does happen. I should have added this disclaimer "I no longer purchase 1lb canisters unless I purchase multiply cans (4 or more cans) of the same lot, I now purchase 8lb jugs of the more common #'s such as H4831, IMR4064, IMR4895 etc. William
Last edited by William T. Watts; November 29, 2012 at 10:51 AM. |
November 27, 2012, 03:36 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
For OAL I use my barrel... I start at the manual's OAL and go down from there depending on what my barrel likes. Thats the best part of reloading, you can make custom ammo tailor made for your weapon!
DASHZNT |
November 27, 2012, 03:43 PM | #13 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
The only bullets that I load shorter than book are Barnes TTSX as their unique shape puts them closer to the rifling at a shorter OAL than most other bullets.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley Last edited by Brian Pfleuger; November 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM. Reason: spellcheck |
|
November 27, 2012, 06:57 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
__________________
Gbro CGVS For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18 |
|
November 27, 2012, 08:18 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2009
Location: nw wyoming
Posts: 1,061
|
I agree on the OAL.
I guess I've always considered the book OAL as the minimum. My loads are always longer. Sometimes WAY longer. |
|
|