September 11, 2012, 03:59 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
Well, I've got two questions that I don't think have been mentioned here yet.
First, have any of you experimenters noticed the same degree of shot-to-shot variation with automatics, which have no gap? And on the same subject, does barrel length of an automatic seem to affect variation in measured velocities, all other things being equal? Second, does factory ammunition for .357 and 9mm Luger ever use the same bullets?
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
September 11, 2012, 09:26 PM | #52 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Originally posted by Hal
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You state or at least infer that, because a 125gr .357 Magnum from a <3" barrel has similar ballistics to a 9mm from a >4" barrel (no argument on that point if you're talking a 9mm +P or +P+) and your M66 is roughly the same size as a full-size 9mm, in this case a Browning Hi-Power, that the .357 snub has no advantage over the full-size 9mm. I responded to this by pointing out that many, if not most, .357 Magnum snubs are substantially smaller than your M66 was, and thus are also smaller than your Hi-Power, so the .357 snub does have a size advantage over a full-size 9mm. I also pointed out that in order to get a 9mm the same size as a small-frame .357 snub, you have to go to a compact or subcompact model with a barrel of 3-3.5" which will, in turn, produce lower velocity than either the .357 Magnum snub or the full-size 9mm. To that, you replied that your comparison was "100% fair" and completely ignored the fact that there are many .357 snubs available which are much smaller than your M66 but still produce similar velocity. By choosing to compare only one of the larger .357 snubs even though I pointed out that there are many smaller .357 revolvers available, you've cherry picked the guns being compared in an attempt to negate the size advantage that a .357 snub can offer over a 9mm that delivers similar ballistics. As I pointed out before, the S&W Model 60 with a 2 1/8" barrel has an overall length of 6.56". That's a fairly reasonable representative gun for a small-frame .357 snub as it's neither the largest nor the smallest available. Now, there is no 9mm semi-auto pistol currently made by S&W, Ruger, Glock, Beretta, CZ, Sig, HK, Browning or any other manufacturer that I am aware of that has both a barrel longer than 4" and an overall length of less than 7". So, in order to get a 9mm semi-automatic pistol that is the same size or smaller than a S&W Model 60 with a 2 1/8" barrel, you will have to get one with a barrel shorter than 4" which will reduce the muzzle velocity of a 124gr bullet to less that that of a full-power 125gr bullet from the M60. Therefore, the S&W M60 has an advantage of either size or power over a 9mm semi-automatic depending on which compromise you choose to make with the auto. |
||||
September 11, 2012, 09:39 PM | #53 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Originally posted by Blue Train
Quote:
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.ph...t_detail&p=114 Quote:
|
||
September 12, 2012, 09:24 AM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
I neither have nor would own one,,,period.. I dry fired a J frame once and put it back on the counter. Buying it would have been a total waste of money. All the positives of a J frame disappear when you have to change you finger position mid trigger pull... I would also not at this stage of my life buy or own a Ruger D/A. The Ruger trigger is all wrong for me. Same with Taurus, Colt,,,,,you name it... Including BTW, a K-frame Smith w/a round butt. Far and away accuracy is my strong point. That's one area where I will accept no compromise. As for the wuestion of how much difference there is between a Jframe (or some other small "pocket .357) and a compact or sub compact 9mm,,,,,I really have no desire or need to invetigate it. It's a 100% meaningless and useless waste of my time. If it's something you wish to chase down, knock yourself out - or don't - it's 100% up to you. |
|
September 12, 2012, 02:28 PM | #55 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2012
Posts: 2
|
I use to carry a S&W 640 all the time
|
September 12, 2012, 03:15 PM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
Quote:
|
|
September 12, 2012, 06:04 PM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
|
|
September 13, 2012, 05:26 AM | #58 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
The model 66 - which I spoke of in my original post & the gun by which I made the comparison with, was both stainless steel and had the round butt frame - two strikes against it right out of the gate. I was willing to overlook the stainless steel aspect as a compromise between my preference for carbon steel vs something that would be more suitable for every day carry. (& yes - I do have several other stainless steel guns - I just don't care for stainless - same with "Tupperware" - I have a few of those too - but - I prefer good old carbon steel - - -however - I'm not a fanatic about it) I was also willing to compromise on the round butt it had, provided I could "put em where I wanted them to go". It turned out that w/a 125 gr. .357 load, accuracy was "acceptable" - but - it came w/a price tag. I could keep all six shots in the X ring of a B-27 @ 25 feet (not yards..Im decent but not that good) shooting rapid D/A - but - the ejector would tear the living crap out of my hand as the gun recoiled. Shooting three or four strings like that wasn't any fun... 158 gr loads were a whole different matter. The gun did not like 158 gr loads & it also didn't like lead. That right there was a foul tip & then strike three... 158 gr. Golden Sabers - the only 158 gr. .357 mag load I tried in it to be perfectly honest - could not stay w/in the X ring @ 25 feet. 158 gr .38 spl lead SWC (my own handloads) literally went all over the place w/several of them keyholing. When I got the gun home & cleaned it & scrubbed the leading out to the barrel, I ran a cotton ball down the bore, shined a light in there & through a magnifying glass was able to pick up some strands hanging in the bore. No real problem there - new gun/rough bore, I could either fire lap it w/jacketed or hand lap it & take care of that issue. (& yes - it was the bore & not the ammo. The same load shoots fine out of my 6" barrel model 19 - it always has for the last 30 some years. It (the 158 gr lead .38spl handload) also shoots fine out of my Marlin Cowboy II. I shoots "dirty" but fine. Unique powder is like that...) It was then that the incident w/the Hi Power took place. The HP was on the table & I noticed how similar in size both guns were. I looked around at the facts and figures of the .357 Mag, 125 gr load vs the 124 to gr 9mm Luger +P loads & made the decision to just dump the 66 and not waste time diddling with it. That gun was cursed from the beginning anyhow.. It started life as a Walther PPK/s that turned into a 10 shot S&W 617 - both of which I also hated. Quote:
I already know how to squeeze one . Which is something I can't do right w/a J-Frame - or going up the scale a bit - an L frame...I wouldn't have one of those things either. K and N - yes - no problem... J and L - no way... 1911 pattern - no problem.. |
||
September 18, 2012, 09:40 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 233
|
All right Webley...just received my new ammo shipment which includes the 130gr Fed Hydra Shok JHP low recoil. I decided to try it first over the CorBon 140 thinking the recoil may be less for my wife. We will see, and thanks for all of the information and explanation.
By the way, why does Federal put these HS's in a box that you basically have to break to get into. I had a box of 380's for the longest time, and everytime I would pick the box up with the broken tab it would spill out all over. Maybe there is a trick to it that I don't know. |
September 20, 2012, 06:40 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,198
|
I carry a 640 every day. It took a good amount of practice to get really reliable accuracy, as I shoot semi's a lot more at the range. But that was years ago now, its a sturdy, easy-to carry gun with a lot of power for its size.
Small frame .357's aren't for everyone. But if you can handle the weapon, it is a nice package. I even bought a sweet factory engraved no-lock a year or so ago, and its now my edc. To each his or her own...
__________________
"An angry prophet, denouncing the hypocrisies of our time" |
September 20, 2012, 07:30 PM | #61 |
Member
Join Date: March 8, 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 87
|
I love snub revolvers but if a bad guy is more distracted by a flash or blast than a gaping wound then you didnt do your job. A bad guy should be gasping for air from a brutal bullet wound more than anything.
|
September 20, 2012, 07:45 PM | #62 |
Member
Join Date: March 7, 2012
Posts: 31
|
Short barrel .357's
I have a Ruger LCR 357. I bought this revolver on a whim. I didn't have any revolvers so I thought why not. I handled the 38 LCR at my LGS and loved the trigger pull compared to a S&W so I ordered the 357.
This weapon is very light and I front pocket carry sometimes for a change from my XDS. It took me a few range trips to get good accuracy but now I am very comfortable at 7 - 10 yds. Of course I practice with 38 specials and I always shoot a few of my carry rounds (Gold Dot 38 +P geared for snubbies). Yes...I also shoot 10 or 15 magnum rounds to stay in the game. The recoil on the magnum is not a problem at all but the muzzle blast is impressive...lol. |
September 20, 2012, 11:41 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2005
Location: USA The Great State of California
Posts: 2,090
|
I carry a S&W M&P 340, 1-7/8 " J-Frame. I load 158 grain with 6.5-7.0 grains of Unique and get 950-990 fps. This is in the high .38+P, low .357 magnum territory. It is about as good as the Speer Short Barrel .357 magnum loads I have tried.
I also carry a S&W 3913 9mm. I use Buffalo Bore 147 grain 9mm +P. I get about 1100 fps from those. I think both of these loadings are pretty equal. I shoot the 3913 more accurately at 10 yards, but the M&P 340 conceals better. 6 of one, half a dozen of the other to my way of thinking.
__________________
Hook686 When the number of people in institutions reaches 51%, we change sides. |
September 28, 2012, 05:17 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 233
|
Just got back from the range where I was sighting in the lasers and checking out new ammo. From advise on this thread, and seeing some of the numbers, I bought a box of the Federal 130gr HS's for my wife's SP101. I shot the requisite 38 +P's, which are very mild, then shot the CorBon 110gr JHP's that I have kept this gun loaded with. Definitely more snap. Then shot a cylinder full of the 130's and whew, there was some snap on that! Definitely could feel that, but not terrible. That's a load. I talked with my wife and explained the difference. I asked if she would rather me keep the 110's in there. She said that if she were being attacked, she wouldn't be concerned with the recoil...load it with what has the best chance of stopping the attack.
|
September 29, 2012, 08:56 PM | #65 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Hal,
I believe you are getting all worked up over nothing. Extreme spread in a revolver can be several things. One of the most common is the chambers may be slightly different sizes, it happens. That is why if I were to worry about it I would mike everything and even record lot numbers of ammo, as that is also a know variable. You will generally find more variation from barrel to barrel than by a short barrel. Pythons have always been slower than Smiths, for the same reason they are more accurate - A tighter barrel. The only time the 9mm comes close to the 357 magnum is where light 110 grain bullets are used in the 357 Mag. Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. Last edited by Nanuk; September 29, 2012 at 09:02 PM. |
|
September 30, 2012, 07:36 AM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Nanuk,
I'm not worked up in the least. I accept that individual rounds can vary - sometimes by an extreme amount. It's no big deal as far as I'm concerned,,for the most part. I do believe that a revolver, having multiple chambers as opposed to a semi auto only having one chamber, helps to contribute to the issue. Re: the 9mm vs the .357 - in the guns I mentioned in my initial post - a S&W 2.5" M66 and a Browning Hi Power. The Speer Gold Dot 125 gr clocks at 1450 fps in .357mag and the 124 gr clocks at 1220 fps in 9mm +P. In my book, given that w/a 2.5" barrel, the .357 is going to lose some & that the longer barrel of the Hi Power is going to be closer to what Speer claims, that's plenty close enough for me to consider them equal. Speer lists using a 4" test barrel for both. There are a lot of people that post here that do get worked up over velocity though. I've read numerous posts where people will believe that 50 to 75 fps difference between one brand and another is a significant amount. I'm not one of them... About the ejector,,,,that's on me 100%. I always (incorrectly) refer to the cylinder latch as "the ejector". I try to catch that slip when I post but sometimes it gets by me. The 66 slid down in my grip during the course of firing 6 shots & somewhere around the third shot the cylinder latch dug into the base of my thumb and tore a chunk out. Firing the last shots w/it digging in deeper and deeper was pretty painful. I kept at it though since I figured in a real life/death situation I wouldn't have the option of stopping - might as well find that sort of quirk a gun has well in advance right? |
September 30, 2012, 09:16 AM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
If you really dislike the revolver that bad sell it. That extra 200 FPS makes a world of difference. That is why I now carry a 357 Sig. I have the best of both worlds, a 125 JHP at an honest to goodness 1450 FPS.
I was getting 1250 FPS from my 640 with 145 grn STHP and my SD was in the 5-10 fps range.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
October 1, 2012, 05:28 AM | #68 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
I did get rid of it (the M66) a long time ago.
Quote:
Even if it is there,,,,I highly doubt it makes any difference at all @ SD ranges, which are measured in feet not yards. None.Nada.Zip.Zilch. Stretch that range out to yards & - yes - velocity becomes more important. This is absolutely nothing more than good old common sense... Main stream ammunition manufactures have been putting out a "one size fits all" product for decades. The same 125 gr load that goes into a 1 7/8" snubbie fits into an 8 3/8" Long Tom & everything in between. Using the old rule of thumb of 50 fps loss for every 1" shorter barrel.....just the difference in barrel length alone makes a difference of what? 300 fps? Throw in ES of shot to shot variance and things get even wilder in that respect. What that tells me is the ammo makers know there's going to be broad performance band (velocity spread) and they make allowance for it. While optimal bullet performance may be tuned for one barrel length, perfectly acceptable performance is possible on either side of optimal - well up to a couple hundred fps. If 50 or 100 or even 200 fps gets you all worked up, then be my guest...knock yourself out and spend you hard earned money chasing it. I honestly don't care about a couple hundred fps. Three hundred? Yes. That's where I begin to take a more critical look....but...there again it's all relative. BTW - if you still feel that 100 or 200 fps is "critical" consider this. Speer uses the same 125 grain bullet for the .38spl +P that's used for the .357 mag.... Speer only catalogs one GDHP in 125 grain for the .38/.357 mag. (They do however catalog a different product number for the "short barrel" 125 grain..HOWEVER - the finished "short barrel" ammunition is a different product) The .38spl +P out of the 4" test barrel is 950 fps. The same bullet out of a 4" test barrel in .357 mag is 1450 fps. That's a whopping 500 fps difference. Yet - despite such a huge difference, time after time after time after time - people have done "back yard" expansion tests of both loads and report good to excellent results. What that tells me is the the spectrum of performance is much, much wider than anybody cares to admit... |
|
October 1, 2012, 02:27 PM | #69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2011
Posts: 751
|
Quote:
People have a tendency to want "the best" that leads to needless optimization. The better method is to design requirements for the solution to a problem, or problem set, and determine the range of fit. The snub nosed revolver is intended for fast handling in short range encounters. I believe the 38 Special load has enough power and accuracy to stop attacks. I load my Ruger Alaskan in 44 Magnum with the previously mentioned Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel ammunition. It is intended for defensive use against humans. It is likely inadequate for black bear, which is the largest critter I could encounter in my area. I change the ammo to moderate soft point hunting loads when I hike. I still carry a small revolver in 38 Special +P loaded with JHP in my pocket. Both guns meet my self-defense requirements when loaded appropriately. |
|
October 1, 2012, 09:18 PM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
The 125gr .357 Mag load at 1400+ fps is what MADE the .357 as the number 1 stopping round. And that is why, if you can take the blast and recoil, its so much better than any .38 Spl. round.
And yes power is important just as speed and accuracy is. You just have to balance now much clout you can control and still be effective. Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
October 17, 2012, 11:34 AM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 233
|
Along the same lines as the 357 short barrel, I am curious about the short barrel on my Kahr CM9. Because of this thread and some of the reading I've done, I first went with the Federal Hydra Shok 130 gr, and I am now going with the CorBon 140gr in the SP101. The BBTI charts show, however, that the 115fr CorBon +P is pretty nasty from a 3" barrel (Kahr CM9) compared to the others, but I read so much where most now are touting that the 115 is really too light. My thinking is that the faster 115 helps out the 3" barrel, do ya'll think this is a correct way of thinking, or like the 357 snub, do most advocate going a little heavier out of the pocket gun. I typically use 124gr +P Win Ranger T's or Gold Dots in the full size SIG P226
|
October 19, 2012, 04:02 PM | #72 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
For me the 357 mag is the king of the hill for SD revolvers.
I understand that velocity is not the end all, for me it is consistency. I do not reload for max velocity, I reload for max accuracy and consistency, shot to shot (which is where accuracy come from). It is really a Ford vs Chevy standard vs auto debate. Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
October 20, 2012, 08:06 AM | #73 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
The only thing more you get from a .357Mag snub at close range over a .38Spl+P or 9mm is blast & recoil.
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
|
October 20, 2012, 09:22 AM | #74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
I used to be all hung up on velocity....
Not any more. 850 to 1100 fps is plenty for up close (SD ranges). |
October 20, 2012, 09:53 AM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
By comparison, a .38 Special with modern premium bullets has trouble meeting those numbers even when given the advantage of a full 4" barrel. The Speer 125gr .38 +P Gold Dot impacted at 888fps, penetrated 12.6", and expanded to 0.199 square inches (avg diameter 0.503"). The Winchester 130gr SXT .38 +P impacted at 923fps, penetrated only 9.8", and expanded to 0.299 square inches (avg. diameter 0.617"). The only .38 Spl loadings that could rival or exceed the .357 Magnum in both expansion and penetration were some of the Buffalo Bore offerings, but their velocities are much closer to standard .357 Magnum numbers than they are .38 +P. http://www.brassfetcher.com/357%20Ma...ry%20Table.pdf http://www.brassfetcher.com/38%20Spe...ry%20Table.pdf |
|
|
|