The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 4, 2014, 12:46 AM   #1
hbhobby
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2013
Location: Payson Az
Posts: 169
Can it be fixed?

I just got a gun and it is an old mauser that was drilled for scope mounts. Well when the "smith" drilled it he drilled all the way into the chamber. The gun shoots great and shells eject with no difficulty at all. But my question is that if there is a way to repair the place that he drilled too deep? Each piece of brass has a spot showing where it expands into the hole slightly. Again shoots great and brass ejects easilly. It is just that i know it is there
hbhobby is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 06:49 AM   #2
Goatwhiskers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2009
Location: Batchelor, La.
Posts: 579
The only way to repair that is to replace the barrel. That gun is quite unsafe in its present condition. GW
Goatwhiskers is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 08:16 AM   #3
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,832
Chamber porting. We joked about it in gunsmithing school.

Seriously, it's time to rebarrel it. If the case fails, pressure could vent through that screw head and knock off the scope base, scope ring and scope. No need for you or others to be injured. Until you get that done, don't shoot it anymore.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 08:27 AM   #4
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
I once had the same problem with a .22 rimfire.
I used a good quality screw that filled the over drilled hole completely and well, without, of course, intruding on the chamber.
And made sure the bottom of the errant hole and screw were very smooth and clean, without any kind of irregularity.
I check it constantly for beginning cracks and other suspicious conditions, but have yet to see one.
But it's not a gun that gets used much.
It's also a much less powerful of a caliber than the Mauser.
So, for your case, it might require a better solution.
If you go this route, beware of the risks.
Your results might not be as good as mine.
Lawyer speak.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”

Last edited by g.willikers; June 4, 2014 at 08:39 AM.
g.willikers is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 08:28 AM   #5
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
There used to be a good deal of discussion on repair of scope mount holes drilled through into chambers. But we are more cautious now.
I won't go into detail because if I told you how and it didn't hold, your lawyer would track down my computer and sue me.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 09:00 AM   #6
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
A shooting bud of mine decided to build up a faux Marine Sniper rifle.



He has a very hard to find Unertl scope




Found a USMC Sedgley barrel




OOPS! the gunsmith drilled the rear base holes a little to deep in the chamber!



The sequence of rounds that it took to blow through the little bit of metal left under the screw hole.

__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 09:05 AM   #7
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
I just got a gun and it is an old mauser that was drilled for scope mounts
I will assume the rifle does not have a scope base mounted, I do believe there would be a hole punched through the case if the screws were not in place.

I do not know what an Old Mauser is. I will not drill and tap a receiver with the barrel installed. It has everything to do with a blind end hole. There is something about the expression on someone's face that says "I just snapped a tap" that causes me to want to avoid the experience.

Off the Internet, in a shop the question was "Who wants these barrels and if you had them what would do with them?" I knew if I had a use for the barrels the price would have gone up from free if you haul them off to a price that would cause me to loose interest.

I suggested the chambers be cut off and recut/reamed to make chamber gages. Then I qualified my next answer with "I would not do 'it', but etc..", not one of the three was the condensing type, the barrels are still there for the hauling off.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 01:45 PM   #8
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
Most gunsmiths drill and tap with the barrel installed; unlike some folks, we are smart enough to set up a drill press so the hole doesn't go through into the chamber.

As for a fix, it can be done, though I don't necessarily recommend it. Make a long screw (6x48, I assume) from fairly soft steel and run it into the hole until the end just protrudes into the chamber. Then, very carefully, use a chambering reamer to cut off the end down to the chamber wall. I have never done it (see above) but have seen one that was done that way and it worked fine. Alternatively, the screw could be cut off flat at the bottom end, screwed down until the end was flat with the chamber, cut off at the top and staked to keep it from moving.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 03:16 PM   #9
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,832
Hi JamesK. We were taught to do that if we didn't drill our receiver holes in the center. Plug it up and redrill. However, with a chamber that's drilled through, I'd call it quits on the barrel.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 04:46 PM   #10
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
cut off at the top and staked to keep it from moving.
I would question the smartness of that method and or technique after staking? drill another hole? that would be 4 holes. add the diameter of 4 holes and add together, I would guess the receiver would just about be cut in half across the top. I have seen that.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 07:30 PM   #11
Chris_B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 3,101
Slamfire, I feel very bad for your buddy. That's a rotten thing to find.
Chris_B is offline  
Old June 4, 2014, 10:33 PM   #12
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I will add to my previous post that IF I ever did fix that hole as I said (not recommended) I would not try to use that screw hole again. If I had to drill another hole, I would move it at least 1/4 inch away and use a different base. If that wasn't possible, I would simply tell the customer that I would not mount a scope on that rifle, period.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 5, 2014, 12:09 AM   #13
kilimanjaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
Yes, you can 'fix' it. Just re-barrel and have a competent smith do the scope mounting. Cost will be just a couple hundred bucks, probably.

Or, you can 'jury rig' it with plugs and screws, thereby delaying the day you wreck your expensive scope mounts, telescope, and injure yourself or a bystander with a blown screw flying around.
kilimanjaro is offline  
Old June 5, 2014, 10:20 AM   #14
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678









I repaired a VZ59 machine gun gas hole, change the shape of the barrel, and put it on a Mosin Nagant.

Anything can be done, if you want to futz with it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tiny pic of TN gun gas hole.jpg (62.8 KB, 26 views)
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old June 5, 2014, 07:58 PM   #15
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The problem I see with drilling a larger hole and using a plug screw is that the brass can still be extruded into the original screw hole under pressure and create extraction problems. That would probably not be the case with a .079" gas port, but I think it might be with a scope screw hole twice that size.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 5, 2014, 09:34 PM   #16
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I have added chamber areas to barrels many times to use good barrels. Nothing is written in stone. It is a matter of measuring and THINKING about what you are doing. I picked up a Type 99 Arisaka at a yard sale once that had the barrel set back and was converted to .300 Savage. The neck of the fired brass had a slight ring around it, kind of like a slight, narrow "O" ring recess would make. I knew the guy blended the two neck dimensions together and the original was slightly larger. It extracted fine, shot very well @ 100 yards. If I posted a picture of that brass on this forum, people would be freaking out about new barrels, headspace, and who knows what. If given the chance to inspect that gun, I probably would repair it. I always like posts from Clark. He does not seem to be a "Bolt on" gunsmith.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 03:25 AM   #17
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,283
Hindsight is 20-20!Most drilling machines(I prefer a Bridgeport) have an amazing device called a quill stop!But,OP,you did not drill the holes,now you have a problem.

Myself,when it comes to chamber,lockup,trigger,safety,etc...the parts of a gun that can hurt folks,it just needs to be right.No half bassing.Its not just you,some kid may end up shooting that rifle.


The decision you have to make,is do you put more money into it,or cut your losses,That is up to you.If it is a military stepped barrel,there are a lot of them laying under benches and in corners.You can find one,have it screwed in,and headspace checked.I would not expect to pay a lot for the barrel,between a 12 pak and $50.Your smith will charge what he charges.

There are number of choices for pre-threaded,short or long chambered Mauser replacement barrels.I like Lothar Walther,about $270 or so,go to the site.Cheaper ones are available.

Bummer.
HiBC is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 04:05 AM   #18
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I would not give him the 12 pack, you may get another hole through the chamber.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 09:09 AM   #19
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
The problem I see with drilling a larger hole and using a plug screw
James K. adding a plug to his plugged screw would have plugged the hole. He could have started with a plug that was too long and worked from there.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 09:48 AM   #20
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
Now that it is out in the open, the version I saw - Gunsmith Kinks or a gunboard - had a smooth ended set screw flush with the chamber wall, with another set screw in behind it to jam it hard into the threads. High strength Loctite, of course. Seems like Loctite has largely replaced jam nuts and screws, but they do have a place.

There is a guy on THR with a hole in his barrel, but it sounds like it is into the rifling. I guess if you can plug a gas port you can plug a foulup port.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 03:53 PM   #21
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
Before modern piezo pressure gauges, the normal way of measuring chamber pressure was by a hole drilled into the chamber and a piston inserted. When the gun was fired, the pressure blew a hole in the case and the piston crushed a copper cylinder. Before and after measurements of the cylinder gave the pressure, hence the term "CUP" or "copper units of pressure."

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 05:06 PM   #22
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
There is still a hole in the chamber for the transducer.
As I understand it, US practice is to either perforate the case or use a "conformal transducer" and make allowance for the stiffness of the brass.

European CIP pressures are measured at the case mouth.

The English used to use an axial pressure gauge with the crusher in the bolt head. It gave substantially different readings which make British loads seem light, especially when you don't realize that they were reading in long tons. Gough Thomas (G.T. Garwood) once compared SAAMI and British data and concluded that the British proof "Ton per sq in" corresponded to about 2800 LUP. His main interest was in shotguns so he did not carry it on to rifles and pistols, CUP vs proof ton.

There was once an entrepreneur who set up an axial gauge and invited you to unscrew your barrel and send it to him. He could then test your loads in your barrel with SAAMI Reference Ammunition for comparison and to develop a formula to convert from axial to radial reading in that one setup.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 07:22 PM   #23
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Clark: That is very clever, but to put that much time in an old military barrel?! That has to be a very expensive barrel for all the labor you put into it.

I bought a shotgun barrel, used, for my M870 shotgun. Turned out the barrel for was a M878 Remington, a gas operated version of the M870. Never heard of it till I bought the barrel, and unfortunately, the barrel had gas ports. A gunsmith friend of mine plugged the holes, which went directly to the magazine tube, with screws and glue. So far, its holding.

I would never do such a thing for a centerfire rifle, no magazine tube to keep the plugs in, and pressures too high.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 10:33 PM   #24
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
I have read about transplanting those Czech MG barrels to make heavy Mosin Nagant barrels. They apparently do very well, if you don't mind putting in endless labor. And who makes match barrels for a '91 anyhow?
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 7, 2014, 09:24 AM   #25
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
I knew the guy blended the two neck dimensions together and the original was slightly larger. It extracted fine, shot very well @ 100 yards. If I posted a picture of that brass on this forum, people would be freaking out about new barrels, headspace, and who knows what. If given the chance to inspect that gun, I probably would repair it
Too late, 7mm57 chambers have been reamed to Remington 280. the 280 Remington reamer will not clean up the old chamber. When finished fired cases are ejected with two case neck diameters because of the generous military neck . Then there are those that had 308 W/7.62 NATO chambers, same thing, the 30/06 reamer will not clean up the 308 W chamber, the case diameter at the case body/shoulder juncture on the 308 is at least .013" larger than the case body on the 30/06 at the same point when measured from the bolt face.

There are other barrels that could provoke:

Quote:
If I posted a picture of that brass on this forum, people would be freaking out about new barrels, headspace, and who knows what.
My motive for not discussing "the other barrels' is selfish, I am afraid talking about 'other barrels' would drive the price up.

Then there is the pressure thing, if only there was something in the, on or near the chamber when the trigger was pulled, wait! There is, the case, the case is in the chamber when all that pressure builds. Cases are like hot horse shoes, it just does not take me long to look at one to determine if there is something wrong. If a case head crushes I need to be able to determine by how much, .00025 is good .0025 for the first firing is a warning.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09128 seconds with 9 queries