|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 5, 2011, 03:05 PM | #26 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
June 5, 2011, 03:17 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
As you have seen in this thread, there are valid arguments on both sides. I chose a semi for the capacity. Cops are said to only average a 20% hit rate. We can assume we will be better, but will we? If we don't, that means we will only hit the BG once by unloading the average revolver. Thus, we are forced to assume a one-stop shot and just one BG. I'm not ready to bet my life or the lives of loved ones on those assumptions. And what if the BG gets me and my wife is on her own? She doesn't shoot as often or as well as me, so how many rounds might she need?
I used to carry a revolver. I like revolvers. I switched to semis a while back for self defense. The extra capacity seems to my mind to be a significant advantage. Think it over and reach your own conclusion, though - I'm just explaining my thought process. |
June 5, 2011, 04:57 PM | #28 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 30, 2007
Posts: 761
|
Quote:
I'm the exact opposite. When I do "dive for cover" drills, engaging multiple targets out to 15 yards rapid fire, I find I do better with a long DA trigger as my inclination, or temptation to jerk the trigger seems to be held in check better, versus say the short trigger of a 1911 which doesn't give any time to "moderate" the squeeze (for lack of a better term) before the hammer falls. As a result, I shoot DA revolvers more quickly and more accurately than 1911s, XDs, Glocks, etc. For me, it is easier to keep the DA trigger in a constant, steady state of motion (I'm already squeezing the trigger while the gun is coming back on target) as I get more tactile feedback in the from of positive pressure from the mechanism, whereas with a 1911 I have to wait for the gun to get back on target and it doesn't really feel like I'm squeezing anything because the pull is so light, which makes it more likely that I'll end up jerking it (yes, this is my problem, not the gun's). In a good handling car, thats also the reason why I prefer a little heft in the steering as it makes my fine movements more precise. I still love 1911s, but I'll have to try out a DA only CZ-75 someday, I figure I might well like it. Different strokes, different folks. If we were all the same, life sure would get boring! Quote:
Anyway, yes that does sound corny, and that may or may not work for you, but it may give you some "mind training" exercises to consider. Last edited by jad0110; June 5, 2011 at 05:06 PM. |
||
June 5, 2011, 05:29 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2007
Location: T-Town
Posts: 185
|
You and me think alike Tailgator
While I enjoy shooting them both. And if both are 100% reliable. I prefere a Semi Auto for reasons aleady mentioned. Some people say that 5 or 6 rounds should get the job done? But In my area, I've been hearing about too many instances where there have been 2 or 3 intrudors. So 13+ rounds makes me feel a little more comfortable. It's been posted and makes good sence. Ammo capacity is like insurance. You can never have enough.
__________________
"Get rid of that chrome plated sissy pistol and get yourself a GLOCK" |
June 5, 2011, 06:35 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
sheepman
you probably weren't even referring to my post plus I know derringers get a bad rap a lot, but I'm giving them a shout out here. I heard about them beforehand, but it didn't stop me. I knew I liked derringers enough to have one. to me a BUG only needs two shots(some people prefer or demand more while others think a BUG is unnecessary). I've had issues if I ever get to the situation where I need the derringer, but I know it will get me the two shots when it does happen. my CCW is much bigger and heavier, but the derringer is like a nice little mouse gun.
all the best GO BRUINS
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
June 5, 2011, 08:32 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2004
Location: Sweet Home Alabama
Posts: 1,475
|
This gun doesn't FTF or FTE. Most HKs don't know either.
__________________
http://www.treasureislandbedandbreakfast.com Ed Brown Alpha Carry| Sig P238, P938, P232, 1911 C3 | Colt Defender, Mustang Pocketlite, 1911 | Rohrbaugh R9 | Browning, Buckmark 22LR(suppressed) | Kahr PM9 Black Rose | S&W|M&P C.O.R.E RMR Trijicon | Dan Wesson ECO |
June 5, 2011, 08:40 PM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: May 29, 2011
Posts: 28
|
p30, g17, or g21sf
|
June 6, 2011, 07:12 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 2011
Location: Washington, the state, not that "other" one.
Posts: 514
|
I like a full size semi auto with a rail and a good light for home defense. I use a CZ SP-01 9mm as my home defense pistol. I live in an area with close neighbors and the 9mm will hopefully lessen the chances of a round hitting a neighbor.
I always hear recommendations for a shotgun as a home defense weapon. Shotguns are great weapons, but they have major drawbacks and training issues. They are not a wonder weapon that makes people fly through windows when shot and other such nonsense. They are longer than handguns, have lower capacity, heavy recoil, pumps require a hand to feed the next round etc... The shotgun can be great, but make sure you train with it properly and remember 00 buck is basically 9 rounds that you have to account for. You need to know you guns shot pattern at any distance you might be employing it on. Most shotguns spread too much at 35+ yards to be able to consistently keep all the pellets on target. |
June 6, 2011, 07:40 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 19, 2009
Location: Wherever I may roam
Posts: 1,506
|
When it comes to home defense I personally prefer a handgun. Quicker to get to on the night stand. I keep a Glock 30 (10 rounds of 45) for myself and a Walther PK380 for my wife. A hit with a 22 is more deadly than a miss with a 44 mag...
__________________
l've heard police work is dangerous. Yes, that's why l carry a big gun. Couldn't it go off accidentally? l used to have that problem. What did you do about it? l just think about baseball. -Leslie Nielsen |
June 6, 2011, 07:45 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
I am a 357 magnum fan for self defense so I gravitate toward revolvers though I do own a Coonan Classic that I am thinking of using for home defense. Currently my home defense gun is a 12GA (Remington 870) with 6 rounds of Winchester PDX1 ammo.
My wife uses her Sig P238 for carry and home defense but I am not sure I trust it.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... |
June 7, 2011, 12:15 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 714
|
Both.
For carry... On the nightstand beside my bed... |
June 8, 2011, 10:00 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2009
Location: SC Missouri
Posts: 663
|
In my experiance most ladies will feel more comfortable with a K Frame size revolver loaded with 38 Specials.
I was at the range a week ago, and got the Plate Rack out for some sporting clays shooters to try out. As I was putting it away, a lady shooter and her husband arrived at the range. She shoots alteast weekly. I asked her if she wanted to try the plate rack. She said she would give it a try. I turned the tractor around and repositioned the rack. She ran it with her Sig 9mm, and also with her CZ75 in 9mm at 10 yards. She was hitting probably a little over 50%. I handed her my 4" HB Model 64 Smith & Wesson to try. She hit 6 for 6 the first time, and 5 for 6 the second. I have an XDm in 40 s&w and a custom 1911 Colt. My wifes home defense gun is a 4" 686. She could use either semi-automatic as her house gun. She does not like them. Too many things to remember, and she has had problems with my semi's feeding for her. She likes her revolver just fine. I also keep my old Scattergun Tech TR870 behind the bedroom door. She has shot quite a few cases of 12 gage shotgun shells shooting Trap with her 870 Trap Gun. You can take it to the bank, she can shoot the riot gun just fine. My home defense gun depends on what I was carrying that day. I carry my 64 smith all the time. Some times I carry my 1911, and some times my 638. I also carry my 29 Smith and my 480 SRH at times. What ever I was packing around that day, is what I have on my dresser at night. Normally it is a revolver of some type. If I had some idea that I might need a handgun, I would probably have the XDm with TFO night sights out of the safe. I shoot a lot, and I am comfortable shooting about anything. If you do not shoot all the time, I still think a revolver is the best choice. A revolver is much more Goof Proof, and Wife Friendly. Bob |
June 9, 2011, 09:38 AM | #38 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 9, 2011
Location: "In the swamps of Montana" with the gators
Posts: 84
|
After purchasing 2 BHP's (different generations), and an EAA Witness, I have come to realize that Clint Smith has said it well: "I would rather shoot 5 rounds well, over shooting 12 or 13 rounds not so well!"
After waking up with someone knocking on 'wrong apartment door' at oh-dark-thrity, grabbing significantly smaller revolver vs. full-size BHP with Rhodesian magazine (don't tell Sen. McCarthy), fits my hand a LOT better in a hurry, and more controllable without 'stand down from Condition 1', or "breaking the gun" necessary. Semi-autos are nice. They -are- peculiar to what you feed them. They WILL jam when you don't need them to do that. Yes, semi-autos do hold more rounds (weight). Magazines do take more physical space, and must be loaded in a correct direction of travel. Revolvers will eat what you feed them, but are usually built for a particular grainage bullet, and will shoot at different POI's. Yet, at a 30-foot range or less, the difference is small. Yes, revolvers have less rounds to hold. Reloads are different actions than semis, but can be just as quick, with practice. |
June 9, 2011, 03:58 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
|
Overall, I've had more "issues" with a limited number of semi-autos than I have with revolvers. I've shot far more revolvers than semi-autos.
That said, I have semi-autos that have never failed in any way, and I've had revolvers that disappointed me in their performance. In the end, it's a matte of finding what works for you, proving it's reliability, and learning to shoot it well. All else is irrelevant. Daryl |
June 9, 2011, 07:40 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,177
|
Either is a viable option--depends which works for you.
I like both, I own both, I carry both (on a seasonal basis). Whatever I carry during the day does nightstand duty at night. Last spring/summer/fall that was a Kahr P45. During the winter it was a 4" S&W M625 in .45LC. Beginning this spring it has been a 4" Kimber 1911. |
June 10, 2011, 01:25 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2011
Posts: 801
|
I agree with many statements above; whatever works for you is whats best. I love both my revolvers and my autos, but they all have a different purpose. I do not like carrying my Ruger LCR 38 SPL+P IWB because the cylinder is so much "fatter" than with my autos, instead, the LCR is a coat pocket & truck gun.
Guns are tools, and I do not believe one fits all very well. |
Tags |
home defense , pistol , revolver , self defense |
|
|