|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
View Poll Results: Which snubbie | |||
S&W 642 | 51 | 45.95% | |
S&W 442 | 27 | 24.32% | |
Bodyguard .38 | 18 | 16.22% | |
Ruger LCR .38 | 20 | 18.02% | |
Taurus 85 UL | 5 | 4.50% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 15, 2011, 07:06 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Posts: 654
|
Yo Kreyzhorse,
Pants one size larger still look OK, and are actually easier to walk around in. I don't pocket carry the J-frame much (no pocket holster), but it surprises me that no-one ever notices it in the front pocket because it prints somewhat, but I guess the odd shape works for CC. Usually the J-frame goes in an IWB, sometimes on the ankle. The Rugers and Kel Tecs are very popular pocket pistols, seems everyone has one, never know if they are carrying breath mints or....
__________________
For 20 years the sea was my home, always recall the sun going down, and my trusty friend, a 1911 pistol, strapped to my side. |
May 15, 2011, 10:55 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2009
Posts: 177
|
Glockfan35, you already own one of the snubs on your poll, so why not stick it (38 Bodyguard) in your pocket and see how it works?
In previous threads you've talked about your purchase. A .38 Bodyguard http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=447205 (post #6) ......... and on another thread you talk about how you own a .38 Bodyguard and ankle carry it. http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=448309 (post#1 & 25) So which is it? Do you carry a 38 already (like you've stated), or don't you? Since you've said in previous threads that you already own and carry a snub, I'm kind of confused by this current thread that seems to indicate otherwise. Last edited by brabham78; May 15, 2011 at 12:13 PM. |
May 15, 2011, 12:56 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
I think the OP and some others were referring to the newest version of the Bodyguard which is "hammerless" polymer design with built-in laser sights: |
|
May 15, 2011, 01:05 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
Oh you want hammerless, sorry. I was going to suggest the S&W 637..
|
May 15, 2011, 01:05 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2009
Posts: 177
|
OP has stated in a previous thread that he owns the new version .38 Bodyguard with w/ Insight laser.
|
May 15, 2011, 01:37 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
But if you're going to actually carry it in your pocket, weight starts to matter. I own a 640 and a 642 Airweight. I tried carrying the 640 (stainless steel) in a pocket and it just didn't work for me - the weight of the revolver changes how your jacket hangs, and your trou as well for that matter. For true pocket carry, the 642 Airweight is a better choice IMO...and I've tried both. (That said, if you can carry a 642 Centennial and two speedloaders in a pocket without it looking like you have a pound of walnuts in your pants, you're a better man than I am. After having tried to dig speed strips and other great ideas out of my trouser pockets, for reloads I went to carrying dump pouches on a belt - at least they were quickly accessible. Still, however, my opinion is that if I need to reload a J-frame in the middle of a gunfight, I'm having a bad day. I think of my J-frame as a 5-shot derringer. Reloading it under fire strikes me as a high-anxiety endeavor...) KnowhutImean?
__________________
Treat everyone you meet with dignity and respect....but have a plan to kill them just in case. |
|
May 15, 2011, 01:58 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 3,210
|
I like that the Bodyguard with its integral laser.
The LCR's grip is fat and short; doesn't allow the pinky to get a hold. Some say it doesn't matter, but I don't like the feeling of the dangling pinky. That is if you're going to carry it a lot and shoot it a little. If you're going to shoot it more than a little and you can cope with the extra weight, you should get the heavier steel 642.
__________________
-Jeremy "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." - Eric Hoffer |
May 15, 2011, 02:06 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2009
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
|
|
May 15, 2011, 02:52 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Posts: 654
|
"...I don't like the feeling of the dangling pinky."
Smaug, with the J-frames I just curl the pinky under the butt, it supports the J-frame like a solid foundation, and this translates to very accurate shooting. I suspect this is why the J-frames come out of the factory with a short boot grip. I find that when I put a longer full finger grip on, it is harder to shoot accurately. Likewise with a PPK vs PPK/S. Sometimes I carry two Bodyguards, the long grip for CQ quick draw, the short grip for the long shot. In the picture below the bottom Bodyguard revolver looks bigger, but thats just the camera angle, they are both the same size.
__________________
For 20 years the sea was my home, always recall the sun going down, and my trusty friend, a 1911 pistol, strapped to my side. |
May 15, 2011, 03:12 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Lowcountry
Posts: 373
|
Since the Taurus costs less than any of those S&Ws and is of the same quality I would make it a toss up between the LCR and the 85UL.
__________________
I say take off the warning labels and let them sort themselves out. |
May 15, 2011, 03:19 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 3,210
|
That is an interesting note, Seaman. I will try it some time, next time I get the chance.
The factory grip on my SP-101 can go either way; either crowd the pinky on, or curl it under.
__________________
-Jeremy "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." - Eric Hoffer |
May 15, 2011, 04:53 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Location: Paradise(South Florida)
Posts: 343
|
So we all agree, except for Earl and me nobody likes Tuarus.
__________________
I got a fever, and the only cure is more guns. Ya wanna go shootin' tomarrow? |
May 15, 2011, 05:14 PM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: November 21, 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 40
|
I myself have always liked the S&W model 37.
hopefully that will be what I get next. if I dont find some other deal that takes my cash. my mom had a model 37 when I was growing up, thats what I learned on in mid calibers, my dad bought a RG in 38 special, & my mom went balistic, & said we didnt need but 1 gun, so she sold hers, unfortunately still have the junk RG, & still miss the 37, & loved the few model 37s I have seen. it is all aluminum, including the cylinder, no +P rounds can be shot ever, but very light weight, one of my favorite pocket pistols. Randy |
May 15, 2011, 08:28 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 614
|
none of the above....................i like the S&W model 649
|
May 15, 2011, 08:36 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 819
|
Love my 642, wouldn't choose another. Works great as a pocket carry option for those instances when anything larger isn't an option, and is also always riding in my winter coat pockets in case I can't get to the primary under all those layers of clothing. I especially love that the 642 can be fired from inside of a jacket pocket if it came to that since there's nothing to snag or prevent operation. Look no further than the 642 my friend...
|
May 15, 2011, 09:04 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
My .38 SPL +P S & W model 638-3 (2).jpg
__________________
"There are three and only three ways to reform our Congressional legislation, familiarly called, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box". - Stephen Decatur Miller (May 8, 1787 – March 8, 1838) |
|
May 16, 2011, 05:55 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Lowcountry
Posts: 373
|
Any Smith made before their manufacturing improvements would probably be superior to anything new.
Vintage 642s and 442s are out there and dont feel like a baby's rattle in your hand. The 357 LCR would be very nice for shooting only 38s because of its extra few ounces of weight. I dont own the Taurus 85UL but I would not hesitate to get one if I was handicapping myself to only new guns.
__________________
I say take off the warning labels and let them sort themselves out. |
May 16, 2011, 07:13 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Location: Small town in eastern KY
Posts: 155
|
I got to shoot an LCR over the weekend, loved it.
|
May 18, 2011, 05:53 PM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Location: Paradise(South Florida)
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
__________________
I got a fever, and the only cure is more guns. Ya wanna go shootin' tomarrow? |
|
May 18, 2011, 10:00 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
Go with any gun you trust. Me personally I would trust any thing from S&W or Ruger.
I carry a J-frame 640... but I shoot 357 magnums.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... |
May 18, 2011, 11:01 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 2,474
|
I have a pre-lock, 357 mag 649.
Love it, action has been worked on and I shoot it better than any other snub it have ever shot. Not one for aluminum framed J frames -- everyone bashes the J frame for not being as strong as a SP101 which I would agree with so why make the things out of aluminum. This and the discoloration / corroded gunk I have seen after carrying one for awhile turned me off to them. |
May 19, 2011, 10:17 AM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
|
What is the difference
What is the difference between the S&W 642 and the 638.
What is the difference between the 642 and 442
__________________
Do not follow where the path may lead, go, instead where there is no path and leave a trail - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
May 19, 2011, 10:23 AM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
42 series are hammerless; 38 series have shrouded hammers.
In airweights, 4 prefix means aluminum alloy frame with blue steel cylinder and barrel; 6 prefix means aluminum alloy frame with stainless steel cylinder and barrel. |
May 20, 2011, 08:05 AM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: January 25, 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 52
|
I just picked up a 442 yesterday and took it to the range last night. I couldn't be happier.
|
May 20, 2011, 08:31 AM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Congratulations on the 442. Everybody should own at least one J-frame.
|
Tags |
ccw , lasers , pocket carry , revolvers , snubbie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|