The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

View Poll Results: Which snubbie
S&W 642 51 45.95%
S&W 442 27 24.32%
Bodyguard .38 18 16.22%
Ruger LCR .38 20 18.02%
Taurus 85 UL 5 4.50%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 15, 2011, 07:06 AM   #26
Seaman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Posts: 654
Yo Kreyzhorse,

Pants one size larger still look OK, and are actually easier to walk around in. I don't pocket carry the J-frame much (no pocket holster), but it surprises me that no-one ever notices it in the front pocket because it prints somewhat, but I guess the odd shape works for CC. Usually the J-frame goes in an IWB, sometimes on the ankle.

The Rugers and Kel Tecs are very popular pocket pistols, seems everyone has one, never know if they are carrying breath mints or....
__________________
For 20 years the sea was my home, always recall the sun going down, and my trusty friend, a 1911 pistol, strapped to my side.
Seaman is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 10:55 AM   #27
brabham78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2009
Posts: 177
Glockfan35, you already own one of the snubs on your poll, so why not stick it (38 Bodyguard) in your pocket and see how it works?

In previous threads you've talked about your purchase. A .38 Bodyguard

http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=447205 (post #6)

......... and on another thread you talk about how you own a .38 Bodyguard and ankle carry it.

http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=448309 (post#1 & 25)

So which is it? Do you carry a 38 already (like you've stated), or don't you?

Since you've said in previous threads that you already own and carry a snub, I'm kind of confused by this current thread that seems to indicate otherwise.

Last edited by brabham78; May 15, 2011 at 12:13 PM.
brabham78 is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 12:56 PM   #28
KyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
Quote:
The Body Guard...because I prefer having the option of SA.
Let's don't get things confused. The original version of the Bodyguard had a hammer shroud and was known as the Model 38 and could be fired single action:


I think the OP and some others were referring to the newest version of the Bodyguard which is "hammerless" polymer design with built-in laser sights:
KyJim is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 01:05 PM   #29
9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
Oh you want hammerless, sorry. I was going to suggest the S&W 637..
9mm is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 01:05 PM   #30
brabham78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2009
Posts: 177
OP has stated in a previous thread that he owns the new version .38 Bodyguard with w/ Insight laser.
brabham78 is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 01:37 PM   #31
Doc Intrepid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glockfan35
"...the idea of having a snubbie to throw in my pocket, along with a speedloader or two"...
If you intended to carry a J-frame in some sort of holster, then it's overall weight wouldn't matter much.

But if you're going to actually carry it in your pocket, weight starts to matter.

I own a 640 and a 642 Airweight. I tried carrying the 640 (stainless steel) in a pocket and it just didn't work for me - the weight of the revolver changes how your jacket hangs, and your trou as well for that matter. For true pocket carry, the 642 Airweight is a better choice IMO...and I've tried both.

(That said, if you can carry a 642 Centennial and two speedloaders in a pocket without it looking like you have a pound of walnuts in your pants, you're a better man than I am. After having tried to dig speed strips and other great ideas out of my trouser pockets, for reloads I went to carrying dump pouches on a belt - at least they were quickly accessible. Still, however, my opinion is that if I need to reload a J-frame in the middle of a gunfight, I'm having a bad day. I think of my J-frame as a 5-shot derringer. Reloading it under fire strikes me as a high-anxiety endeavor...)

KnowhutImean?
__________________
Treat everyone you meet with dignity and respect....but have a plan to kill them just in case.
Doc Intrepid is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 01:58 PM   #32
Smaug
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 3,210
I like that the Bodyguard with its integral laser.

The LCR's grip is fat and short; doesn't allow the pinky to get a hold. Some say it doesn't matter, but I don't like the feeling of the dangling pinky.

That is if you're going to carry it a lot and shoot it a little.

If you're going to shoot it more than a little and you can cope with the extra weight, you should get the heavier steel 642.
__________________
-Jeremy

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
- Eric Hoffer
Smaug is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 02:06 PM   #33
brabham78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2009
Posts: 177
Quote:
If you're going to shoot it more than a little and you can cope with the extra weight, you should get the heavier steel 642
The 642 is fairly light (15 oz empty). It has an aluminum frame.
brabham78 is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 02:52 PM   #34
Seaman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Posts: 654
"...I don't like the feeling of the dangling pinky."

Smaug, with the J-frames I just curl the pinky under the butt, it supports the J-frame like a solid foundation, and this translates to very accurate shooting. I suspect this is why the J-frames come out of the factory with a short boot grip.

I find that when I put a longer full finger grip on, it is harder to shoot accurately. Likewise with a PPK vs PPK/S.

Sometimes I carry two Bodyguards, the long grip for CQ quick draw, the short grip for the long shot.

In the picture below the bottom Bodyguard revolver looks bigger, but thats just the camera angle, they are both the same size.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg S&W 438s.JPG (41.9 KB, 30 views)
__________________
For 20 years the sea was my home, always recall the sun going down, and my trusty friend, a 1911 pistol, strapped to my side.
Seaman is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 03:12 PM   #35
earlthegoat2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Lowcountry
Posts: 373
Since the Taurus costs less than any of those S&Ws and is of the same quality I would make it a toss up between the LCR and the 85UL.
__________________
I say take off the warning labels and let them sort themselves out.
earlthegoat2 is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 03:19 PM   #36
Smaug
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 3,210
That is an interesting note, Seaman. I will try it some time, next time I get the chance.

The factory grip on my SP-101 can go either way; either crowd the pinky on, or curl it under.
__________________
-Jeremy

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
- Eric Hoffer
Smaug is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 04:53 PM   #37
10 Beers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Location: Paradise(South Florida)
Posts: 343
So we all agree, except for Earl and me nobody likes Tuarus.
__________________
I got a fever, and the only cure is more guns. Ya wanna go shootin' tomarrow?
10 Beers is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 05:14 PM   #38
deathrider
Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 40
I myself have always liked the S&W model 37.

hopefully that will be what I get next. if I dont find some other deal that takes my cash.

my mom had a model 37 when I was growing up, thats what I learned on in mid calibers, my dad bought a RG in 38 special, & my mom went balistic, & said we didnt need but 1 gun, so she sold hers, unfortunately still have the junk RG, & still miss the 37, & loved the few model 37s I have seen.

it is all aluminum, including the cylinder, no +P rounds can be shot ever, but very light weight, one of my favorite pocket pistols.

Randy
deathrider is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 08:28 PM   #39
vytoland
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 614
none of the above....................i like the S&W model 649
vytoland is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 08:36 PM   #40
scsov509
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 819
Love my 642, wouldn't choose another. Works great as a pocket carry option for those instances when anything larger isn't an option, and is also always riding in my winter coat pockets in case I can't get to the primary under all those layers of clothing. I especially love that the 642 can be fired from inside of a jacket pocket if it came to that since there's nothing to snag or prevent operation. Look no further than the 642 my friend...
scsov509 is offline  
Old May 15, 2011, 09:04 PM   #41
mesinge2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally posted by Seaman

The option of having SA for that rare long shot (if necessary) is better than having no option. And the SA snubbie is very capable with 50 yard plus hits.

I carry the S&W M438 Bodyguard which does not snag (because of the humpback frame), and is 15 ounces, light enough for IWB, ankle or pocket.

Krezyhorse, pocket carry is fine, I wear loose fitting jeans with 438 Bodyguard in front pocket, pants are one size larger, 36 instead of 34, with a good belt of course.
+1 I voted 642 only because you did not have the 638 for an option. Mine has been utterly reliable and I love the option of SA.

My .38 SPL +P S & W model 638-3 (2).jpg
__________________
"There are three and only three ways to reform our Congressional legislation, familiarly called, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box".
- Stephen Decatur Miller (May 8, 1787 – March 8, 1838)
mesinge2 is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 05:55 AM   #42
earlthegoat2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Lowcountry
Posts: 373
Any Smith made before their manufacturing improvements would probably be superior to anything new.

Vintage 642s and 442s are out there and dont feel like a baby's rattle in your hand.

The 357 LCR would be very nice for shooting only 38s because of its extra few ounces of weight.

I dont own the Taurus 85UL but I would not hesitate to get one if I was handicapping myself to only new guns.
__________________
I say take off the warning labels and let them sort themselves out.
earlthegoat2 is offline  
Old May 16, 2011, 07:13 AM   #43
ChrisJ715
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Location: Small town in eastern KY
Posts: 155
I got to shoot an LCR over the weekend, loved it.
ChrisJ715 is offline  
Old May 18, 2011, 05:53 PM   #44
10 Beers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Location: Paradise(South Florida)
Posts: 343
Quote:
+1 I voted 642 only because you did not have the 638 for an option. Mine has been utterly reliable and I love the option of SA.

My .38 SPL +P S & W model 638-3 (2).jpg
Now that's a classy clasic. Made of METAL like a real gun. (in case the dog finds it) with WOOD grips, fixed sights that can't move, no batteries and no intergrated circuits or opto electronics.
__________________
I got a fever, and the only cure is more guns. Ya wanna go shootin' tomarrow?
10 Beers is offline  
Old May 18, 2011, 10:00 PM   #45
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
Go with any gun you trust. Me personally I would trust any thing from S&W or Ruger.

I carry a J-frame 640... but I shoot 357 magnums.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well...
Deja vu is offline  
Old May 18, 2011, 11:01 PM   #46
RsqVet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 2,474
I have a pre-lock, 357 mag 649.

Love it, action has been worked on and I shoot it better than any other snub it have ever shot.

Not one for aluminum framed J frames -- everyone bashes the J frame for not being as strong as a SP101 which I would agree with so why make the things out of aluminum. This and the discoloration / corroded gunk I have seen after carrying one for awhile turned me off to them.
RsqVet is offline  
Old May 19, 2011, 10:17 AM   #47
Roland Thunder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
What is the difference

What is the difference between the S&W 642 and the 638.

What is the difference between the 642 and 442
__________________
Do not follow where the path may lead, go, instead where there is no path and leave a trail - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Roland Thunder is offline  
Old May 19, 2011, 10:23 AM   #48
MLeake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
42 series are hammerless; 38 series have shrouded hammers.

In airweights, 4 prefix means aluminum alloy frame with blue steel cylinder and barrel; 6 prefix means aluminum alloy frame with stainless steel cylinder and barrel.
MLeake is offline  
Old May 20, 2011, 08:05 AM   #49
Champion5
Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 52
I just picked up a 442 yesterday and took it to the range last night. I couldn't be happier.
Champion5 is offline  
Old May 20, 2011, 08:31 AM   #50
KyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
Congratulations on the 442. Everybody should own at least one J-frame.
KyJim is offline  
Reply

Tags
ccw , lasers , pocket carry , revolvers , snubbie

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11491 seconds with 10 queries