|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 5, 2017, 09:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
|
Resized Brass Neck Size Issue
I'm a relatively new reloader, and am attempting to form 260 Remington brass out of spent 308 cases (of which I have many). I resized them this evening and it went well, using a simple 260 FL sizing die. However, I have one major concern.
The neck opening measures only .2595" on (average) after sizing. That's .0045 thinner than the .264" bullet that will be going in. From what I've read, that's going to give me too much tension on the bullet. I've read that .0001-.0002 smaller than bullet diameter is the goal. Does this mean I have to ream the inside of the necks? Or is there something I can do during the sizing process to fix this? I have to outside neck trim them anyways (neck walls are too thick), so do I go ahead and just trim the neck thickness down on the outside and not worry about the bullet tension? Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
__________________
In God we trust. |
January 5, 2017, 09:31 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 1,970
|
reloader
Did you use the neck expander die before seating bullets?
Measure the neck before and after using the expanding die and see what you get.
__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". --Thomas Jefferson |
January 5, 2017, 09:35 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
|
Ammo.crafter, the measurement I posted was right after resizing. I haven't seated any bullets yet. All I've done is run the brass through a FL sizing die with tapered expander.
__________________
In God we trust. |
January 5, 2017, 10:03 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
If you need to turn down the necks anyway, I'd do a few then seat some bullets to see what happens.
You may just need to use a larger expander. I wouldn't worry about "too much tension" as long as you can seat the bullets without causing problems such as distorting the cases or scraping the bullets. Consistency is more important than "how much" tension there is.
__________________
One shot, one kill |
January 6, 2017, 12:15 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 9, 2016
Posts: 588
|
As long as you chamfer and or use boat tail bullets, you should be OK. I'd bet my hornady dies had about the same neck tension.
|
January 6, 2017, 06:59 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2015
Posts: 1,768
|
REAL common for people that have a micrometer and actually bother to check...
Since 0.0001" won't show up on the 'Horror Fright' digital calipers they usually crunch & shoot, then complain never knowing what they are actually building. Depending on the die maker, Some will tell the you "Tough..., what do you expect for $30" Some will want a few bucks for a rod/larger ball, Some will send you the ball or rod for free. It will probably be oversized & you will have to hone/Lap it to exactly what you want... OK with me, I can easily take a little off, I find it VERY difficult to add more! The upper end 'Competition' die companies will apologize and build an expander to YOUR specification and you will have it, usually for free, in about a week. I know $150-$300 a set for dies hurts, but you really do get what you pay for. |
January 6, 2017, 11:16 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
|
Your using fired brass. You already mention necks are thicker and you have to turn them. You may have to anneal them also.
I don't think I fire one as is in that chamber unless loaded dia is same as you use before.
__________________
Semper Fi Vietnam 1965 VFW Life member NRA Life Member |
January 6, 2017, 02:34 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
|
|
January 6, 2017, 03:44 PM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
Agree. Outside neck turning will give you better neck wall thickness uniformity than inside reaming. The main reason for inside reaming, to my mind, is to eliminate a donut. If you have one, you should be able to probe for it with a paper clip.
The upper case in this photo has a very visible internal donut formed by multiple resizings. For outside neck reaming, a common procedure is to size the inside of the neck for the turning mandrel with a slightly larger expander mandrel held in a mandrel expander die body. Sinclair sells these (749-011-715WS 17 thru 338 Caliber Expander Die Body) and the mandrels. The same mandrels will get your OD opened up where you want it at the same time they set the slip fit for the outside turning mandrel. Note that the Sinclair turning mandrels also fit in that die body, and I find that expanding a neck with one rather than using the expander inside the sizing die is less prone to bending the neck off-axis with the rest of the case.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
January 6, 2017, 04:13 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
That's all they need to do. The rifle's chamber is the best case gauge anyone could ask for.
__________________
One shot, one kill |
|
January 6, 2017, 08:36 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
|
Several of you guys have mentioned inside reaming. I looked up an inside reamer for my Forster tool and it says that the reamer is "several thousandths" larger than the diameter of the bullet.
I don't understand how that would be useful? Would I have to resize, ream, then resize again? Makes no sense.
__________________
In God we trust. |
January 6, 2017, 10:16 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
|
If you can resize a 308 case to 260 and load it without trimming the neck thickness, will it chamber in your rifle? If it will, I don't see the need to thin the necks out. I have used a heck of a lot of 30-'06 cases in my 270 Winchester by simply resizing and loading as if they were correct 270 cases without any trouble whatsoever.
|
January 7, 2017, 08:18 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,899
|
Quote:
Here's the test for neck tension: - Measure the OUTside neck diameter of the currently sized/expanded case. - Seat the desired bullet. - Measure the OUTside neck diameter again. How much difference is there between the two measurements? (postscript: THAT's the measurement where the "1-2 thousandths" number comes from) |
|
January 7, 2017, 10:41 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
That goes for the tension thing; no one can measure tension, tension is a new internet reloader term. I never got started with tensions, I started with bullet hold because I can measure bullet hold in pounds; again I do not have a conversation for tensions to pounds. One more time, I have tension gages; problem, my tension gages are calibrated to pounds. And then there is the necking up and or down, most reloaders believe the neck gets thicker and or thinner with no consideration to the possibility the neck could get longer and or shorter with one exception; me. Another consideration when forming and or necking a case neck up and or down, that comes under the category or working the brass. When forming cases I use new cases, even then there is no guarantee after forming and seating a bullet the case neck will not split in time and or split when fired. F. Guffey |
|
Tags |
6.5 , case prep , neck expander , neck turning , resizing |
|
|