The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 15, 2011, 12:25 AM   #1
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
Deer (or animal) "HARVEST"

I hate that term. I never use it. It would make me feel like I'm kissing some tree hugger's a**. No more X-mas in stores. Now it's the "holidays". This politically correct crap stuff is starting to get so rediculous. "We're going to harvest a deer!" Wheeeee.

Sorry. Rant over.
warbirdlover is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 12:47 AM   #2
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
Quote:
No more X-mas in stores. Now it's the "holidays".
Harvest regarding hunting limits dosn't bother me near as much is one complaining about replacing Christmas with holiday then in his rant X'ing out Christ.

What that has to do with guns is beyond me though.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 07:39 AM   #3
twins
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2010
Posts: 393
Variety is the spice of life.

Sensitivity training for all.
twins is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 08:06 AM   #4
shortwave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
Before this ones closed...

...I'm with kraigwy.

Can't stand the 'x-mas' thing.
shortwave is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 08:16 AM   #5
Scout
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 510
I believe in hunt and release.
__________________
God bless the U.S. Cavalry
Scout is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 08:51 AM   #6
musher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2005
Posts: 462
Since I hunt to eat, harvest seems like a good word to me.
musher is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 08:56 AM   #7
stu925
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 953
My wife once asked me when I came home from a hunting trip if I "caught anything". I thought that was pretty funny as I had a mental image of jumping out of my tree stand on top of the deer. Now she just asks "did you shoot anything?". The term harvest doesn't offend me, although I've had enough of all the other PC crap. Was a big stink a couple years back over a HS football team mascot, the team mascot is an Indian. That irritated me a bit but the school stood their ground which I was happy to see.

Stu
stu925 is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 09:02 AM   #8
hornetguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2011
Location: on the north side of DFW
Posts: 970
I have sort of liked the idea of using the word "harvest" when discussing hunting amongst non-hunters. It seems to give them a reminder that meat doesn't come from a grocery store.. it begins with the harvesting of an animal.
While I've never been one to be "politically correct", and this topic has nothing to do with politics, I have no problem with using the term "harvest".
When talking to just my friends that hunt, I'm liable to say that I'm going out to try to slaughter Bambi.
hornetguy is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 09:12 AM   #9
chewie146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
My daughters use the word "catch" too. They're 4 and 6. That's fine with me. They're little kids. PC is here to stay, ladies and gentlemen...whoops. I said ladies. I forgot about that one. It's not a bad idea to be sensitive to others sensibilities. You're an ambassador for your sport, even though sometimes it's very irritating. Support for hunting is going back up nationally, even though hunting license sales are dropping some in many locations. The numbers of women and youth hunting is going up. If a name change is part of these other changes, that's fine with me.
chewie146 is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 11:24 AM   #10
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
I like "harvest" better than "kill". But that is me. For years, states would publish maps or records showing the deer harvest by county. From their perspective, the term is correct as they are viewing hunting from a game management perspective.

When I read the term "harvest", I think of a hunter sitting in a permanent stand in South Texas or Central Texas where management rules. Ten deer are wandering around on a food plot or near a feeder and the hunter chooses the one he wants to "harvest" from his stand position. I realize as I present this, it has a pretty negative connatation from a traditional hunting point of view. But there is room for all kinds of legal forms of hunting. If I had the money I would be right out there trying to "harvest" one there myself. It is not as easy as it is typically presented in the hunting shows on TV. I have never shot a B&C 150 point scored buck in my life and would love to.

I can't agree with you more about Christmas. PC is taking over (for now); it will change.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 11:36 AM   #11
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
I didn't mean to PO anyone. Just got a bug in my rear I guess. Like we have to use the word harvest or they'll take away our hunting privileges. But I guess when dealing with the anti's etc it's probably a better word to use.
warbirdlover is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 12:02 PM   #12
Wyoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,352
The word "harvest" has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with game management. Historically, Americans have managed wildlife as a farmer would a crop. We hunters mandated that the States produce game in numbers above the minimum needed for a viable population. This approach allows us to "harvest" the excess animals by hunting, just as a farmer plants grains that produce enough seed to be planted again.

It is pretty much a given that in order to "harvest" an animal, one must kill that animal, but not always. Take for instance, the BLM wild horse program. Each year in the western states the BLM "harvests" the excess wild horses from the range and then these animals are made available to the general public. Another insance of "harvesting" game without killing it is the Bison roundup in Montana. This critters are then given to Native Americans to bolster their herds.

But I digress. "Harvesting" excess game with a tool (firearm) has been one of our founding game management philosophies since Aldo Leopold.

“There are two spiritual dangers in not owning a farm. One is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery, and the other that heat comes from the furnace.”
― Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac
__________________
Go Pokes!
Go Rams!
Wyoredman is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 12:13 PM   #13
Wyoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,352
In his book, "Game Management", Aldo Leopold defined it as "the art of making land produce sustained annual crops of wild game for recreational use".

In other words, he is sugessting that the land can produce a "harvest" of game for the hunter.

This, I believe, is where the word originated. Not from the PC world we live in now.
__________________
Go Pokes!
Go Rams!
Wyoredman is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 12:21 PM   #14
doofus47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
I'm more in line with Warbird and Kraigwy, although not enough to rant.

Words have meaning. If I don't harvest cows at the slaughterhouse, I don't harvest game 3 miles off the beaten path in the dark timber.
doofus47 is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 01:03 PM   #15
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
I HARVEST deer...
I am not a sport hunter...
I feed them corn and shoot them from my bedroom window or from a lawn chair with a cup of coffee beside me.

When I "hunt" in the woods, I am just strollin' with a gun in hand. Deer steps out, if legal, I shoot him. Not much huntin' there...


Now hog doggin' I never call "Hog Harvesting"... I actually have to hunt and work and am hands on with a potentially lethal animal...

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 01:05 PM   #16
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Forty/fifty years ago, it was quite common for deer hunters to tie Bambi to a fender or across the trunk for the ride home if they were in a car. Even the ladies would ask a guy whom they knew was a hunter if he had killed a deer, yet?

Then PC attacked, and successful hunters now hide their deer under a tarp and talk about harvesting. In modern America, the deal is to avoid talking about reality and the way the world really works.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 01:22 PM   #17
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
I think some use the word "Harvest" outta respect for their quarry. In many cases it is actually more appropriate than the word "hunt". If you plant a kernel of grain and nurture it and protect it till it is ripe, you don't "hunt" it, you "harvest" it. That is what deer hunting has got to be in many places, especially behind high fences. Folks feed and water deer, protect them from predation and other hunters and then when they have antlers big enough or they don't produce quality offspring, they don't really "hunt" them, they just go out to the feeder and "harvest" them. Either way, I still like the term better than some of the newer terms that many like to use, i.e......"DRT" and "Whack 'em and Stack 'em!".
buck460XVR is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 01:30 PM   #18
Indi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 231
Wouldnt that be the right term if you are going to kill it for consumption. My buddy told me that his family used to grow beef (raise cattle).
I guess if you grow your own beef, you could harvest it

Last edited by Indi; November 15, 2011 at 03:21 PM.
Indi is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 01:30 PM   #19
AllenJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
It seems like more and more we are told not to "offend" people by saying "Christmas time" or "I killed a deer". Yet I have to put up with listening to other use vulgar language in public and allow them to let their behind hang out of their pants? Now my rant is over
AllenJ is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 01:53 PM   #20
musher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2005
Posts: 462
Quote:
My wife once asked me when I came home from a hunting trip if I "caught anything".
That's a pretty common way to talk about it up here. I often say things like "We caught a moose".

I'm sure it's not a result of any excess sensitivity on my part, having been certified by those who know as somewhat lacking in that respect.
musher is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 03:03 PM   #21
ISP 5353
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 134
I don't get real hung up on what people want to call it. I hunt and kill deer, but if others prefer "Harvest" then that is fine with me too. I am just happy to see people out hunting!
ISP 5353 is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 03:18 PM   #22
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
Quote:
Forty/fifty years ago, it was quite common for deer hunters to tie Bambi to a fender or across the trunk for the ride home if they were in a car. Even the ladies would ask a guy whom they knew was a hunter if he had killed a deer, yet?

Then PC attacked, and successful hunters now hide their deer under a tarp and talk about harvesting. In modern America, the deal is to avoid talking about reality and the way the world really works.
In Wisconsin you HAVE to display the whole deer outside of the vehicle (or in the truck bed with the tail gate down) until you have it registered.

So we still drive around with our harvested, dead, bloody deer on our fenders!
warbirdlover is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 03:27 PM   #23
Saltydog235
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2010
Location: Pawleys Island
Posts: 1,563
I'll third the taking Christ out of Christmas sentiment. If you aren't celebrating His birthday then you should be working or something.

I don't harvest anything but veggies. I take game I kill it. I shoot deer, you could concievable call it murder or assassination, I call it fun and rewarding.
Saltydog235 is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 04:28 PM   #24
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
I call it harvesting. I actually think it works FOR our cause rather than against it.

I harvest corn, beans, all kinds of trees for building and heat.

There really is no distinction. We have dominion over the plants AND the animals.

It is no less immoral to eradicate an entire forest full of Red Woods for no purpose than to kill a herd of deer for no purpose.

It is equally moral to harvest animals for human use as it is to harvest corn, or trees to build a house.

Only humans can be murdered. Animals and plants can be killed and wasted.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old November 15, 2011, 04:59 PM   #25
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
I've never planted a deer or turkey.

warbirdlover
I too take some exception to this term and it's application. To me, animals are flesh and blood and have never seen any roots.
Another term you hear, is Cull or Culling and that seems more applicable.

There are times I teach Hunter Ethics during our Hunter safety classes and I call it like it is and that is killing animals. I don't want to soften or play it down. I want the students to understand what we are doing and be fully responsible for our actions. I get some strange looks when I state then I'm not out there to hurt animals but instead to kill them. Not a big hang-up but I do have them ... .


Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.13254 seconds with 8 queries