|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 4, 2013, 08:29 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 365
|
Barrel length legality?
I know that a shotgun must have a barrel length of at least 18" to be legal, but is it illegal to posess a shotgun barrel shorter than 18" if it is not assembled as a shotgun?
|
July 4, 2013, 08:38 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,992
|
There's no issue as long as you don't have a shotgun that it will fit.
I wouldn't risk it if I also owned a shotgun that went with the barrel.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
July 4, 2013, 09:47 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
|
If you have an underlength barrel and a receiver that it would fit, that is known as "constructive possession" and means that you are in violation because the feds assume that if you COULD assemble a sawed off shotgun that you DID assemble a sawed off shotgun.
|
July 4, 2013, 10:03 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: The "Gunshine State"
Posts: 1,981
|
IF you live in Canada, no issue....IF you have applied for a NFA tax stamp, no problem
If you have someone's BUBBA'D barrel, dispose of promptly |
July 6, 2013, 03:57 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
|
.
If you're an LEO, N.P., either.............. . |
July 6, 2013, 11:56 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 1,235
|
Quote:
|
|
July 6, 2013, 04:07 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2009
Posts: 1,102
|
Cut to 19" that way you won;t get hassled it's an inch over tht limit and it patterns nice!
Mine puts 9 balls into9" @ 12 rt. That's torso width... BPDave |
July 6, 2013, 06:54 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: The "Gunshine State"
Posts: 1,981
|
Dreamin- a barrel less than 18"requires a tax stamp here in the US
|
July 6, 2013, 09:22 PM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Pistol?....
I'm not a ATF Special Agent or have a JD but I was a bit confused by a gun show table display that had a few Remington pump & auto shotguns with wood stocks that were custom pistol grips. The shotgun barrels looked short too(16-18").
I asked the clerk(a older guy; 55-65) if they were AOW(Any Other Weapon) classified or if they needed tax stamps. The guy said; "No, these are considered & sold as pistols." I'm not sure how'd you safely fire 00 buck or a 12ga slug from one of these shotguns but it didnt seem legal to me. |
July 6, 2013, 09:43 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 1,235
|
BigD, I know about the tax stamp thing, but am not sure that even if you pay it to the Feds you aren't running afoul of state law, if there be one.
|
July 6, 2013, 09:45 PM | #11 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,992
|
Quote:
What I suspect is that they were legal because they had sufficiently long barrels (18" or longer) AND were sufficiently long in terms of overall length (26" or longer). Even with the gun exceeding all the critical dimensions, it can make for a surprisingly compact firearm. Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
July 6, 2013, 10:03 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 1,235
|
Clyde, I don't know if this is correct, but the weapon's legality supposedly depends on whether it came from the factory with a buttstock or a pistol grip. See this re Pistol Grip Only
http://shockwavetechnologies.com/site/?page_id=88 Added by edit. After doing a little reading on the subject, I don't feel comfortable with the ATF's decisions nor do I know enough to say they are wrong. If I am correct, the cost of an ATF stamp is a small price to pay if it means you don't risk running afoul of federal firearms law. I may have this wrong, but if you only are registering the transfer of a weapon to yourself the cost is $5, but if you manufacture one it is $200. Last edited by Dreaming100Straight; July 6, 2013 at 11:49 PM. |
July 6, 2013, 10:21 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 196
|
I never looked into it but, it made me curious: Why does one need a "tax stamp" to get a shorter barreled shotgun?
Personally, I don't think there should be any restriction on any firearms as such, but that's just me; I know the tyrants have gotten into the system to a degree, so you see idiotic crap like this happen, sadly.
__________________
A government that refuses to trust its citizenry with guns is, therefore, a government that cannot be trusted with guns, in turn! |
July 6, 2013, 11:14 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
|
My cousin has two 20ga pistols in Idaho that have outside hammers and 6 inch barrels. Both were stamped and have been in the family for decades. He did have to go through the ATF when he inherited from his father. $200 bucks each believe. I'm guessing they are still legal.
They sure look mean in his thigh holsters though. Boomer
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war. We're from the government, we're here to help |
July 7, 2013, 11:13 AM | #15 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: The "Gunshine State"
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
July 7, 2013, 10:45 PM | #16 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
"If you're an LEO, N.P., either.............."
No problem for an LEO IF the gun is owned by and registered to his department, but an LEO is the same as anyone else in regard to personal ownership of an NFA firearm. For the guns at that show to be legally pistols, they would have to 1) have been made from scratch as pistols and never have had a shoulder stock put on them and 2) have at least part of the barrel rifled. Yes, there are such guns made, so those may well have been legally pistols. (They might not have been made as pistols by the company which made the receiver; it would be legal for the X Company, a manufacturer, to buy Remchester shotguns, and make them into pistols as described.) Jim |
July 8, 2013, 12:02 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 506
|
If you have the short barrel and the matching SG reciever in the same proximity you have a T2 problem. Does not need to be assembled. Only exception is if you have an ISSUED T2 registration. Applying for such does not entitle you to anything until it is APPROVED and ISSUED. LEOs are NOT exempt from this unless the SG is department issued and owned. Personal FAs for LEOs still subject to same rules for possession as civilian.
As to the question concerning a pistol grip on a smooth boar, it is still subject to NFA rules as a short barreled SG. Last edited by colbad; July 8, 2013 at 12:15 AM. |
|
|