|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 8, 2012, 11:08 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Posts: 28
|
Old smith and wesson .32 revolver
Hello I have a S&W .32 cal long revolver 4 inch barrel from my dad it may have been his dad's. I think it is a police model the # I found when I took off plastic grips is 516_ _ . I see not everyone uses full serial number, the same numbers are on the back of the cylinder. The last date stamped on top of barrel is July 1903. I would say fair shape at the most. Most of the finishing is off, was wondering the value.
|
July 8, 2012, 07:35 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
It is a Smith & Wesson, .32 Hand Ejector, Third Model, made between 1911 and early 1942, serials 263001-534532. Since yours would have been made toward the last, it would probably date to 1940.
With so many made, there is collector interest only in ones in top condition, although the target grips do add some to the value. I would offer a WAG at about $225. Check if there is a "step" in the backstrap under the grip. If so, the gun is a Regulation Police and would bring a few dollars more. Jim |
July 8, 2012, 07:49 PM | #3 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
tommyd78: Please clarify. Also, one other question... Quote:
Quote:
The serial number of the gun would have been written on the inside of the RH panel at the factory with light-colored grease pencil, but on hard rubber stocks this age, the writing is often so smudged that it's illegible.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; July 8, 2012 at 07:50 PM. Reason: topstrap --> frontstrap, whoops |
|||
July 8, 2012, 08:04 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
Your grips look longer than my grips. Optical illusion?
If you ever plan to reload for these things be aware that these older S&W’s did not have heat treated cylinders for most of their production. Yours, dating from WW1, most certainly would fall into that category. Therefore if you ever plan to reload for the things you must stay within published reloading data and never attempt to +P loads for it. If you ever shoot the thing or reload for it you will find that these 32 S&W Long revolvers are extremely accurate and low recoiling. There is hardly more recoil than a .22LR and the accuracy is just great.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
July 8, 2012, 09:09 PM | #5 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|||||
July 8, 2012, 09:36 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Posts: 28
|
old s&w evolver
Yes the 5 numbers were on the butt of the gun. I am not sure what you mean by a step on handle?
|
July 8, 2012, 09:39 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Posts: 28
|
s&w revolver
The grips cover the butt have to take off to see numbers so they are not stock grips? They were wood grips like I see on others?
|
July 8, 2012, 10:25 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
This is a 32 hand ejector third model so it is later BUT generally ALL of the round butt guns in those days had the hard rubber grips. The wooden round butt grips were earlier (model 1899 K frames for example) AND later (post war). For these I frames, I'm almost sure that all of the pre war round butts would have had hard rubber UNLESS special order. If the gun was special ordered with those extension grips, IMO the SN would be in the SAME place it is now.
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|
July 9, 2012, 08:12 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
If those grips are in good condition they could be worth more than the revolver. I run into hand ejectors for $150+/-, condition is everything.
This one cost me just under $200 and cleaned up fairly well. These early I frames have become popular with shooters and collectors, the prices have gone up in the past few years. |
July 9, 2012, 08:24 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Posts: 28
|
old S&W REVOLVER
Yes those are some pretty nice guns you got there very nice. I would have to say the grips on my gun are in better shape than the gun finish. I fired it and you don't need 2 hands to shoot. It would be a nice plinker gun. I had old bullets to go with it that I guess the powder was old cause I had some misfires. I don't know if I will shoot again I know its not worth much but I could get something off my next purchase which would be a Glock 23.
|
July 9, 2012, 12:32 PM | #11 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Sorry, I wasn't thinking when I asked about the step but obviously, if the grips needed to be removed to see the serial, the gun would not be a Regulation Police.
If anyone has a standard (not RP) I frame with the number on the front of the grip, can you post pictures? AFAIK, only the RP had the serial number on the front strap, the reason being that the standard RP grip covered the butt. But on other guns, the serial was on the butt. While some grip styles covered the number, it would not be known until final assembly what grip would be installed, long after the serial was put on. |
July 9, 2012, 02:49 PM | #12 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
I've also seen a ~1930-vintage .32 with target sights, extension stocks, and a frontstrap serial; however, the target sights probably put the gun in a different category. I'm simply not enough of an expert on these old .32's to definitively tell you where the serial number should be on a 1906 fixed-sight gun with factory extension stocks. As stated above, I believe that .22/32's, later .32HE Targets, and .32RP's had frontstrap numbers, but I've never personally examined a pre-1920ish .32 that was wearing a pair that appeared original to the gun. Actually, I've never personally seen any in black hard rubber! (IIRC they were walnut after the early 1920s.) Somebody on the S&W forum may be able to answer this question. Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
||
July 9, 2012, 05:11 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Posts: 28
|
old S&W revolver
So getting back to my original post these hand grips are plastic not rubber so does someone think these aren't original?
|
July 10, 2012, 06:15 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
If original grips they would be a very hard rubber. They may feel like a poured resin type of plastic similar to Bakelite. This hard rubber well chip or crack like plastic.
|
July 10, 2012, 10:03 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
^^^ What Madcrate said. The stuff is like a very old, weather-beaten tire; it is very hard, has a glossy exterior appearance, and is not pliable like most modern rubber products.
I suspect that most people under the age of 40 have little exposure to this material; it seems to have rarely been used on postwar consumer products, probably because it is more expensive to produce than similar plastics. FWIW handles of old tools and some parts of old toys were made of similar hard rubber. OTOH if the interior of the grips are hollow, they are injected-molded plastic and are definitely NOT original. FWIW I have seen somewhat old (probably 1970s vintage) injection-molded reproduction S&W stocks at gun shows before, albeit not for vintage I frames.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
July 10, 2012, 11:47 AM | #16 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Those grips appear to be injection molded - the round mark at the bottom looks like an ejector pin mark. I can't find anyone today who is making those grips, although other S&W grips are being reproduced.
Hard rubber, or gutta percha, is a natural product like rubber, but from a different plant. It was used quite a bit prior to the discovery of the vulcanization process for rubber because unvulcanized rubber is brittle, where gutta percha is flexible until it ages. Its use then diminished, but continued until the discovery of man-made plastics. Jim |
July 10, 2012, 06:37 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: April 30, 2012
Posts: 28
|
old S&W REVOLVER
They are hollow grips so they are rare then? Okay so there was a reply that said the grips may be worth more than the gun? What do you guys think ? thanks. tom
|
July 10, 2012, 07:34 PM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
||
July 11, 2012, 11:38 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
If the inside contour is hollow and follows the outside contour- i.e. the material is a fairly uniform thickness and is not flat against the grip frame- they are modern reproductions made from injection molded plastic; see posts #15 and #16. These are basically worthless by themselves and subtract some value from the gun as they are not factory-original. However, if it's any consolation, the loss of collector value will be minimal on a gun that is in rough shape otherwise. Even if the grips are factory, they are visibly damaged and therefore are not worth a whole heckuva lot (+1 Win73). AFAIK the only I frame stocks that really get collectors' attention by themselves are (a) genuine factory mother-of-pearl, which get into 4 figures(!) if they're pristine, and (b) the rare mottled blue-and-red hard rubber. That said, ALL decent factory I frame stocks have some value because the grip frame was lengthened in 1952; factory stocks made after this date can be mounted on an earlier gun but very obviously don't fit properly at the bottom.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|