|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Does an Armed Citizen have a Moral/Ethical Duty to Retreat (complete safety) | |||
Yep, at all times | 30 | 13.89% | |
Nope, Never | 92 | 42.59% | |
Yep, but only on the street, not in the Home/Business | 63 | 29.17% | |
I'm not ansering because I dont want to seem either wimpy or bloodthirsty | 15 | 6.94% | |
I'd rather have pic of you and Spiff iwearing spandex loincloths lard wrestling in a baby pool. | 16 | 7.41% | |
Voters: 216. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 25, 2009, 10:47 AM | #501 | |
Junior member
Join Date: August 30, 2004
Location: Right here!
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
|
|
June 25, 2009, 10:54 AM | #502 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 161
|
Pax
Quote:
As sad as that story is, Mr Crabtree did not follow Rule #4: Be Sure of Your Target Quote:
Quote:
The scenario that OP presented us with, we are already certain the invader is a BG and, in practice we should always positively identify the target before we engage. I still hold to my position that homeowners should not give [positively identified] invaders the benefit of the doubt. |
|||
June 25, 2009, 10:58 AM | #503 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2009
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 439
|
if staying put for me in BR, then it's mossberg / cell phone / kneeling on bed side opposite door and waiting / listening until the police arrive
if situation exists and unfolds and it doesn't seem likely to have time to secure loved ones behind me in BR, then it's .357 revolver / sure fire and position in middle hall between master BR and child's BR Peetza is wise to stick to one area and protect that area. Mine would be to not venture beyond the hallway. I may not confront / use force in say den or kitchen or laundry room but police on the way or not, if intruder comes to and down hall way in the wee hours then there will be light and target id and possibly force used depending on the target and their actions. |
June 25, 2009, 11:05 AM | #504 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Someone I know actually went outside and around the house the other night to confront someone breaking in. Ended OK when the guys took off, but.... If folks choose to not get some training, they should at least do some research. Last edited by OldMarksman; June 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM. Reason: Addition |
|
June 25, 2009, 11:07 AM | #505 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
bababooey,
You're right. He should have positively identified his target before he opened fire. That's the safety rule that was broken. But he had every indication that there was an intruder in his home -- and he chose to go forward into that situation, rather than retreating to safety and calling the cops to deal with it. Maybe he believed that anyone who broke into his home was "bought and paid for," and had "forfeited their right to live" when they broke in. That would certainly help create the type of mindset where target identification becomes inconsequential, no matter what the safety rules might say. Do you suppose, if he had it to do over again, Mr. Crabtree would choose to retreat to a safer location and call the cops, rather than placing himself in a situation where he had to shoot in order to stay ahead of the (unidentified) "attacker's" reaction curve? pax |
June 25, 2009, 11:21 AM | #506 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
First, the idea that cops are there to protect you. They are not. They are there to enforce the law. Which more often than not just means bringing in the bad guy after he has committed the crime. My sister once called the police because her ex-boyfriend was trying to kick her door in one night. She then called me. I was there over 15 minutes before the police arrived. If he had not decided to flee when he heard I was coming imagine what he could have done to her in that amount of time. Plus, try calling to police every tie you hear a sound in your home without first seeing what it is...see how long that works. Second, the idea that just because we are capable of deadly force it is our only option. One can confront a trespasser without using excessive force. I can kill a man with my bare hands if needed. Does that mean I have to run away every time there is even the slightest threat of violence? Do I have to live my life being a perpetual victim simply because I am capable of defending myself? Do I need to accept the idea that I have to take whatever someone else does to me simply because am capable of meeting their attack with greater force? This idea that a am the "immoral" person if I meet a threat with reasonable force is laughable. I would not meet a threat with more force than necessary so I should not be precluded from defending myself. The whole idea that the homeowner is "escalating" the situation by responding appropriately is absurd. Finally, I have issue with all the people in here that have somehow been brainwashed into thinking that even if it is a good shoot you are going to go to jail or face dire legal issues. That is just NOT the case. There are many, many good shoots every year and the vast majority of them face no repercussions. It is only when the shooter uses poor judgment or unreasonable force that such issues come up. People will focus on the one case of a bad shoot and try to portray that as the norm when it could not be further from the truth. Quote:
Last edited by Playboypenguin; June 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM. |
||
June 25, 2009, 11:21 AM | #507 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Gosh... go to the lake for a few days, come back, and this thread is still open, still civil, and... still interesting. Not half bad.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
||
June 25, 2009, 11:27 AM | #508 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
The homeowner must first find and see the "threat" and then decide whether the person is in fact a threat. A criminal intruder does not have that requirement. That, and the possibility that he might be facing multiple intruders firing from more than one direction, adds to the homeowner's considerable tactical disadvantage. Far wiser to stay put and let the threat come to you. |
|
June 25, 2009, 11:31 AM | #509 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Quote:
That's why you call the cops when there is an intruder in your home: because their job is to apprehend the bad guy and take him to jail. Your job, as a regular citizen, is simply to stay safe until they do so. Apprehending the intruder is not your job. You might, incidentally, apprehend the intruder while defending yourself, but apprehending the intruder is not your job. Protecting you from harm is not the cops' job. They might, incidentally, protect you from harm when they arrive to apprehend the intruder, but protecting you is not their job. When someone tries to take over the cops' job, all too often they neglect their own job of staying safe. "I gotta hunt this guy down, he's in my hooooooome!!!" Emotionally satisfying, tactically foolish. (And -- since I just veered over to tactics as opposed to moral choices, a topic for a different thread, perhaps.) pax |
|
June 25, 2009, 11:37 AM | #510 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
People on here seem very devoted to the "right" to bear arms...why ignore the "right" to defend yourself and the sanctity of your home? And yes, I used the word sanctity. Peace of mind is a very important part of a healthy emotional state. Without it a person cannot be a well adjusted person. How much peace of mind can someone ever have if they have no place to feel secure? How safe can they feel if they are always running? One of the creeds this country is founded on is the right to "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." How liberated is someone when they must flee their own home or feel afraid to protect themselves? How happy can someone be knowing they cannot even defend their own home with being looked down upon by others? |
|
June 25, 2009, 11:59 AM | #511 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Ft Stewart, GA
Posts: 932
|
Home invasions are become rather routine in Atlanta in the past year. The BGs are becoming bolder as they'll now attack at high noon, dinner time or really anytime.
I'm not a mall ninja or a violent person - but if my home is invaded I will not hesitate to use my firearm to end the situation. Anybody, and I mean anybody that forces their way into my home is threatening me and I will end this threat as quickly as possible...
__________________
Proud to be a veteran. (USAF Retired, Army Civilian) I'm old, grumpy, and jaded - still vertical though... |
June 25, 2009, 12:03 PM | #512 | ||||||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No, you don't call every time you hear a noise. But if noise that is indicative of someone in the house does turn out to represent the presence of a person in your home, "seeing what it is" may prove to be your last earthly act, or, as it turned out for Mr. Crabtree, it may result in a terrible tragedy. Quote:
But I wouldn't characterize someone who has unlawfully entered my domicile at night as a trespasser. Quote:
Quote:
In the case of Mr. Crabtree, the point pax was making is to not take actions that create the risk of getting shot or the risk of shooting the wrong person to avoid getting shot first. Defending oneself and one's family from safety, rather than doing something dangerous,does not constitute "running away". Secondly, in many cases and in many places, you must "run away" if you can safely do so before using deadly force to defend yourself. That includes killing with your bare hands. The requirement goes back many centuries and predates the wide use of gunpowder. It's not true everywhere, and in most states, it is fortunately not true in your home. __________________ Last edited by OldMarksman; June 25, 2009 at 12:27 PM. Reason: Corr.--substituted person for VCA |
||||||
June 25, 2009, 12:04 PM | #513 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
PBP ~
Okay, then let me restate. That's why you call the cops when there is an intruder in your home: because their duty is to apprehend the bad guy and take him to jail. Your duty, as a regular citizen, is simply to stay safe until they do so. Apprehending the intruder is not your duty. You might, incidentally, apprehend the intruder while defending yourself, but apprehending the intruder is not your duty. Protecting you from harm is not the cops' duty. They might, incidentally, protect you from harm when they arrive to apprehend the intruder, but protecting you is not their duty. When someone tries to take over the cops' duty, all too often they neglect their own duty of staying safe. "I gotta hunt this guy down, he's in my hooooooome!!!" Emotionally satisfying, tactically foolish. (And -- since I just veered over to tactics as opposed to moral choices, a topic for a different thread, perhaps.) Back on topic: I've always used "right" as a question of what one can morally do in a given situation. Which would definitely make its use begging the question in this conversation. pax |
June 25, 2009, 12:05 PM | #514 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
June 25, 2009, 12:21 PM | #515 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
I'm almost 65. When I was about 15, my grandmother heard a noise downstairs and got me out of bed. Someone (no one else else in the family in town) was opening and closing desk drawers. Showing my immaturity and lack of training, I armed myself and went downstairs....... ....to find the cat rooting around in the desk for a catnip mouse. Had I called the police, they would have gotten a chuckle. Had I fired, I wouldn't have heard it. I was armed with a Model 1903 Springfield rifle. Several obvious things to do differently.... |
|
June 25, 2009, 12:24 PM | #516 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
I will never use deadly force simply because I can or because it was legal. I will use deadly force only because I feel that I had no other choice and a innocent-life is likely to be forfit, if I dont. Only in that situation am I willing to risk what it is likely to cost me to defend myself against such an action. Just becuase my action were justified does not mean that it wont cost time, money and heartache to prove it.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... Last edited by FireForged; June 25, 2009 at 12:30 PM. |
June 25, 2009, 12:57 PM | #517 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
If I stood back and watched a thief steal money from a sleeping old homeless woman and did nothing but give his description to the police an hour or so later when they arrived I am no real help at all...no matter how I try to rationalize it. I do find it odd that I, of all people, find myself being to the right of center in this particular discussion but so be it. |
|
June 25, 2009, 01:03 PM | #518 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Ft Stewart, GA
Posts: 932
|
While I will do my best to retreat from situations outside my home, the same rules do not apply inside my home. I want one single place on this worsening, dangerous planet that I control.
I will not retreat in my home and I will proactively protect my home. I've worked for 37 years to acquire the things I have and I will not, repeat, will not hide in a bedroom while I'm being robbed. You invade my home - the consequences are yours to accept.
__________________
Proud to be a veteran. (USAF Retired, Army Civilian) I'm old, grumpy, and jaded - still vertical though... |
June 25, 2009, 01:17 PM | #519 | ||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
June 25, 2009, 01:22 PM | #520 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
It also sounds like you are failing to understand that running away is not the only alternative to using deadly force. Stop with the "you better run away or you are going to be in trouble" spiel. It just isn't true and does nothing but perpetuate the idea that anyone that defends themselves is asking for bad things to happen and somehow responsible for the outcome of another persons choice to break the law and endanger innocents. That just condones the idea that anyone who owns a gun is looking for a confrontation by the very fact that they have prepared themselves for one. |
|
June 25, 2009, 01:23 PM | #521 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 13, 2009
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
Three words: Replacement value insurance. |
|
June 25, 2009, 01:24 PM | #522 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 13, 2009
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
|
|
June 25, 2009, 01:24 PM | #523 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
not to induce veer, but...
... my buddy had a home burglary last month. Found out State Farm in his area has a $2000 cap on firearms, regardless of actual worth. His NIB Python alone was worth almost that much.
So, "Replacement Value Insurance" may not give true replacement value. |
June 25, 2009, 01:28 PM | #524 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 11,515
|
Quote:
If I am in my car and someone comes up and says "give me your car or I will take it from you!" and I decided to drive away instead of giving him the car am I then responsible if he pulls out a gun and starts shooting at my car and hits a bystander? And if he did pull out a gun and start shooting would I be justified in stopping my retreat and returning fire to stop him from harming anyone or am I "escalating" the situation? If I see a teen beating up an old woman should I walk away and call police or should I attempt to stop him. If I do attempt to stop him and I responsible for his actions if he then pulls a knife and attacks me? Did I cause that to happen? Last edited by Playboypenguin; June 25, 2009 at 01:34 PM. |
|
June 25, 2009, 01:31 PM | #525 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 161
|
PAX
Quote:
Quote:
1) Your in my house 2) you are definitely a BG 3) I cannot retreat further Bang! Last edited by bababooey32; June 25, 2009 at 01:46 PM. |
||
Tags |
moral duty , morality |
|
|