The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 22, 2010, 08:12 PM   #1
joshawa91
Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2010
Location: virginia,mn
Posts: 28
.223 or .243

hi, I'm looking at getting a .223 or .243 in a stevens 200. don't know which to get. they're both in the same price range, and i know there has been in the past a shortage of .223, both have barely any recoil. what do you guys think. it will be mostly for longer range shooting (500yrds). dont need a new deer gun, i already have a blr in .30-06.
__________________
Win 190 .22lr, browning blr .30-06, rem 1100 .410 bore field, win 1200 12ga, soon hopefully a cooey 39.
joshawa91 is offline  
Old February 22, 2010, 08:19 PM   #2
jman841
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 715
For distance, .243 in my opinion. For plinking, .223. .243 u can use some heavier grain bullets and the trajectory is pretty much a laser gun with lighter weights.
jman841 is offline  
Old February 22, 2010, 08:25 PM   #3
ndking1126
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,932
the stevens 200 has a 1-9" twist in .223. This is good for bullets up to 69gr. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but you can shoot 500 yards with the 69'ers if you don't need match-level accuracy.

Cheaper ammo and distance.
ndking1126 is offline  
Old February 22, 2010, 08:25 PM   #4
88KEYS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2010
Posts: 145
I agree with the above post.

I have both and the 243 is a great long distance round and you can load light 65 gr. or over 100 gr., mine in Ruger M77 with a trigger replacement shoots dime size groups @100.
88KEYS is offline  
Old February 22, 2010, 08:36 PM   #5
88KEYS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2010
Posts: 145
I agree with Jman.

The other post is correct also 223 is used for High Power @600 yards. I load 77gr. 75,69,68, they say 1-9 will top out at 68-69 grain, 1-8 is 77,75, grain twist.

I have not been shooting long to know, High Power is new to me. It is true 223 cost would be much lower even if hand loads. I just like the power of the 243 for a light gun it has some real power. I bought my son one also hoped he would go hunting with me, no luck. He lives Soccer! Plays year round and it cost me more then if he was shooting, hey thats what he wants.

You can not go wrong with either both good rounds.
88KEYS is offline  
Old February 22, 2010, 09:00 PM   #6
DiscoRacing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2008
Location: milton, wv
Posts: 3,640
i have two .223... no .243... and i shoot my 700vlss a lil over 400yds right now....which is as far as our two hilltops are apart
DiscoRacing is offline  
Old February 22, 2010, 09:27 PM   #7
crghss
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 537
.223

Save on the cost of ammo. If you're just punching paper the paper won't know. I don't really see any advantage over the .223 by the .243.
crghss is offline  
Old February 24, 2010, 12:22 AM   #8
joshawa91
Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2010
Location: virginia,mn
Posts: 28
ok, thanks. any info on the rifle?
__________________
Win 190 .22lr, browning blr .30-06, rem 1100 .410 bore field, win 1200 12ga, soon hopefully a cooey 39.
joshawa91 is offline  
Old February 24, 2010, 01:08 AM   #9
emcon5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 1999
Location: High Desert NV
Posts: 2,850
Quote:
The other post is correct also 223 is used for High Power @600 yards. I load 77gr. 75,69,68, they say 1-9 will top out at 68-69 grain, 1-8 is 77,75, grain twist.
For what it's worth, the I have a 1-9 twist barrel that shoots Hornady 75 grain AMAX bullets very well. It does seem than anecdotally, it could go either way on that though, some people say it works fine, others insist it doesn't.

The .243 will let you shoot heavier bullets with a higher BC faster, but at the cost of higher component costs, (~20gr more powder per load, just under 2X the powder charge per round, 6mm bullets cost a little more than .224, brass is more expensive), higher recoil, and likely shorter barrel life. If you are buying ammunition rather than handloading, be prepared to squeal like a pig with decent quality .243 ammo.
emcon5 is offline  
Old February 24, 2010, 09:54 AM   #10
crghss
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 537
stevens 200

Quote:
any info on the rifle?
Thought you where set on rifle. But since you ask the stock is reprehensible. I couldn't believe someone would sell something like that. Looks like the little 1" high plastic toy soldier I got in 25 pack as a kid. :barf:

I've thought about getting one and maybe putting another stock on it. Since the gun is so cheap and from what I've read they're very accurate.

But hey, if it saves you money to use for other things and you don't mind then fine. To each his own.

Last edited by crghss; February 24, 2010 at 10:00 AM.
crghss is offline  
Old February 24, 2010, 06:49 PM   #11
ndking1126
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,932
I recently bought a Stevens 200 in .223. Came with the tan stock. The tan stock is much more tolerable in appearance, IMO. The rifle is pillar bedded from the factory. The front end is flimsy and can be bent with your hand. All in all, plan on replacing the stock if you are looking for accuracy. Having said that, it's nicer than I thought it was going to be and therefore I pushed that down on the list of upgrades. I started by installing a Rifle Basix trigger, set at about 2 lbs. For the money, it's a decent rifle. I'm happy with my purchase.

Having said that, unless you just have a love of tinkering (which I do), I would recommend you consider the 12fv or 10fp by Savage. For around 2x the cost, you get a rifle that is basically ready to go out of the box. To upgrade the Stevens to the same specs will cost more than just buying the Savage to start with, depending on which heavy barrel you choose to replace the sporter that comes on the Stevens.

Last edited by ndking1126; February 24, 2010 at 07:01 PM.
ndking1126 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07433 seconds with 10 queries