|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 5, 2006, 07:16 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8
|
Strange situation from the news
From an alert e-mail service that I get... It's not local to me (well, it's less than 50 mi. anyway, which is "local" in TX)
http://www.crimeweb.net/details.asp?id=7589 First thought that came into my head, after "A cat is a pretty strange thing to steal" is "What, if anything, could have been done, had somebody with a CHL been present?" My tentative answer to that is "Nothing" because, assuming the initial report is correct, the gun was only brandished, and only a cat was stolen... I don't know what somebody with a CHL could have done other than try to hold these guys for police, and that's assuming that drawing down on them didn't escalate things. What do you all think? |
January 5, 2006, 07:41 PM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 18, 2005
Posts: 3,298
|
Satan worshipers ? I can only hope those two guys were poor and couldn't afford to give one of their boy or girls a pet so they stole one out of desperation.
Personally, if a cruel looking monster tried to make off with a cat (I like really like pets ) I would plant a .38 right in his chest and explain it to a jury need be. No they aren't people, but they are just innocent little animals not to be allowed to be had by sadistic people (especially ones willing to brandish guns at other people) Would you let someone makeoff with either of these two? |
January 5, 2006, 07:45 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,568
|
Even drawing down, . . . if the guys just told the CHL holder to kiss off, . . . turned and walked out, . . . nothing to be done.
Good thing though, . . . looks like it should be pretty easy to ID the tee shirt dude, . . . 20 yrs in the slammer for catnapping a kitty Stupid is as stupid does, I guess. May God bless, Dwight
__________________
www.dwightsgunleather.com If you can breathe, . . . thank God! If you can read, . . . thank a teacher! If you are reading this in English, . . . thank a Veteran! |
January 5, 2006, 08:33 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 219
|
<<I don't know what somebody with a CHL could have done other than try to hold these guys for police, and that's assuming that drawing down on them didn't escalate things. What do you all think?>>
I'm curious about the thinking here. Are you going to wait for them to shoot someone before you react? They might shoot you first. If someone draws a weapon to commit a crime, they present a deadly threat merely by presenting the weapon. Shoot them. <<Even drawing down, . . . if the guys just told the CHL holder to kiss off, . . . turned and walked out, . . . nothing to be done.>> If you draw your weapon, fire it.
__________________
I am a Soldier. I fight where I'm told, and I win where I fight." GEN George S. Patton, Jr. |
January 5, 2006, 08:41 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 1998
Location: Santa FE, NM
Posts: 2,163
|
Uh-oh, Cat Burglers
I suspect flashing the gun while commiting a robbery will get you armed robbery most places. Hope the hairbag makes out OK, a pox on the perps
__________________
M2 The Second Amendment IS homeland defense! |
January 5, 2006, 08:57 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
|
THis is not funny
Around here (Indiana) back in the 80's scum bags were sealing dogs and cats from around homes and using them for dog fights.
What they would do is throw dogs or cats in to the rings with only one of the fighting dogs and it would tair them to peices, then another fighting dog would be brought in and another poor animal would be tossed in. These scum bags would do this to rais the bets. I know this from a good friend that was an undercover officer that busted several rings. If you are into dog fighting you are less than human. In one case they actualy broke into a pet store and took a good number of animals. Shoot them and ask questions later. |
January 5, 2006, 09:06 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 2, 2005
Location: tennessee
Posts: 686
|
The FBI just busted a huge cock fighting ring not far from me. Those people were idiots they advertised on t-shirts. The t-shirts read (I've been to the DEL RIO cock fights). And people wonder how the get caught.
__________________
Scan and Breathe Scan and Breathe Stupidity should hurt |
January 5, 2006, 09:10 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Posts: 3,261
|
Simple. Death or imminent threat of death or great physical injury. Weapon was brought out as a threat. Draw, aim, fire, reload and repeat as needed until threat is terminated. Armed robbery and assault with intent to harm/kill. No free pass.
|
January 5, 2006, 10:24 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8
|
"If someone draws a weapon to commit a crime"
"Weapon was brought out as a threat" Read again, the weapon wasn't out, it was shown but not drawn. I gather that the perp just pulled up his shirt to show it. Then these guys start to leave with the cat. All things being equal, you're looking at starting a gunfight over a cat, in a pet store with other people around. It looks to me like the only moment where you can shoot is immediately when the guy lifts his shirt and you see a gun. Other than that it's a case of "leaving while brandishing", where's the imminent threat? I'm sorry, maybe coming from Massachusetts originally this is all just hair-splitting and the cops in Texas won't come down on you like a ton of bricks for just blasting the guy in the store even though he's walking away, but I thought the idea was to avoid killing people when not necessary... (Though if he's taking the cat for an animal-fighting ring :barf: I'd be happy to shoot him any old time ) |
January 5, 2006, 10:38 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 219
|
After he showed the weapon, anytime his hand went near his belt he could possibly have been drawing the weapon.
It makes no sense that a person could flash a gun, commit a crime, and walk away from a CCW holder. Criminals will start leaving the gun in their belt and just showing it, because that makes them perfectly safe.
__________________
I am a Soldier. I fight where I'm told, and I win where I fight." GEN George S. Patton, Jr. |
January 5, 2006, 10:58 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: October 26, 2005
Posts: 64
|
You show the gun - you used the gun.
Really simple, no nuance required. G |
January 6, 2006, 05:19 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
This is brandishing a handgun. Display of a weapon with intent to intimidate. Done in the comission of a robbery. = Armed robbery = by definiton a violent felony. Flash your gun at me while you take my stuff/pets/whatever/threaten my life, thats a direct and immediate threat on my life, and you're toast. Now as to a gunfight in a petstore... That is a big judgement call. If I am not near what is going on, and (assuming I even see the gun) not immediately involved, blasting away is a bad idea. I will try my best to be a good witness. If I am also looking at the lil kitty kats and that gun threat is directed towards me, see above............ |
|
January 6, 2006, 07:53 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 17, 1999
Posts: 551
|
If someone had drawn and shot the guy displaying the gun, it would have been a clean shoot- perhaps not a wise decision, but legally justified.
Understand that when the robber displays a firearm in this circumstance it comes with an implied threat: "Do what I want or I'll shoot you." Ability, opportunity and jeopardy are all established. If someone had shot him in the back as he left... well, this was in Texas, but I don't recommend it.
__________________
TB., NC |
January 6, 2006, 03:21 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8
|
"Justified but (possibly) unwise", then... That makes sense to me. I didn't intend to dispute the justification for shooting (I understand that if he's showing it, he's using it and the threat is there) but more that what you could do on the scene might be dictated by the flow of events and what the surroundings are like. I was thinking of the pet adoption days they have on our side of DFW, where the cages are out front, with nothing to stop a slug from flying out across the parking area and into the road (other than BG's sternum). The solution to that is Good Shooting, I guess.
Frankly, when it came time to lay down .45 I'd be more worried about accidentally hitting the cat. **** the perp, I wouldn't want to hurt the kitty. The cat's innocent. The thief is Just Another A-Hole. |
January 6, 2006, 03:57 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 296
|
Armed robbery over a cat!!! What a maroon
__________________
The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved. I Don't want you in here period...Patricia Konie NOLA 2005 |
January 6, 2006, 05:08 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2004
Location: South West OHIO (boondocks)
Posts: 1,337
|
tanksoldier wrote:
Quote:
Think about it. I'm in the store. I see one perp brandish, then you (another perp to me) draw a gun. I shoot you, because you are the more immediate threat, then move to him.....smart? Don't think so..... |
|
January 7, 2006, 09:36 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,137
|
States differ
As probably everyone knows, states differ on the standard for defending one's self:
1. A reasonable person would believe he/she was in imminent danger of being killed or seriously injuried. This is an objective standard. 2. The person actually believed he/she was in imminent danger of being killed or seriously injured. This is a subjective standard. Some states may also have a stricter standard: The person was actually in imminent danger of being killed or being seriously injured. This uses 20/20 hindsight with no room for error. In addition, states differ on whether there is an affirmative duty to retreat and under what circumstances (e.g., some say no duty to retreat from a habitation). Most (all?) states also do not allow use of deadly force to protect property. For example, in my state, the subjective standard is used for defending one's own self. There is no right to use deadly force for the protection of property. You would probably come out okay on self-defense if you told the police/jury the right stuff -- "I was scared to death he was going to pull the gun and shoot me because anyone crazy enough to commit armed robbery for a cat is crazy enough to kill someone just for the fun." However, if you told them, "I thought they would steal the cat to use in animal fights and how could anyone be so terrible to do this with such a cute kitten," then plan on going to prison. The standard for protecting a 3rd person may vary even from the standards above; e.g., in my state it is the 20/20 hindsight rule. |
January 7, 2006, 10:06 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 201
|
I was threatened with a gun. I am in danger.....take it from there.
|
January 8, 2006, 01:01 PM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: October 29, 2005
Location: Brownsville, Texas
Posts: 46
|
Third Person Protection
Derius T wrote
Quote:
BTW, at night you can use deadly force to defend property. Don't mess with Texas! Chuck |
|
January 8, 2006, 07:01 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2004
Location: South West OHIO (boondocks)
Posts: 1,337
|
Yes, I understand that you also have the right to defend other persons from death or immediate bodily harm by use of deadly force, and in certain states, may protect personal property. That being said, I don't see ANY jury in the word letting you go free for killing a man who was stealing a cat.....thats just stupid....
Quote:
|
|
January 8, 2006, 09:09 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 10, 2004
Location: Indiana(obviously)
Posts: 362
|
As I said over at THR, if the cat was stolen for them to train their dogs, if they're ever caught, they should be put into a pen to play with the friendly tigers for a few hours.
And the tigers should not have been fed for awhile. |
January 9, 2006, 01:53 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 219
|
<<Think about it. I'm in the store. I see one perp brandish, then you (another perp to me) draw a gun. I shoot you, because you are the more immediate threat, then move to him.....smart? Don't think so.....>>
So we've all become completely incapable of protecting ourselved from crime BECAUSE we carry a gun? Incidentally, private citizens do have the power of arrest... you just have to be willing to use it. Also, in the case mentioned above, I didn't kill him because he was stealing a cat, I killed him because he threatened me with a weapon.
__________________
I am a Soldier. I fight where I'm told, and I win where I fight." GEN George S. Patton, Jr. |
January 9, 2006, 09:04 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: South China, Maine
Posts: 814
|
haha I will be the first to say it, I guess. Id offer then $10 for taking the pesky little chinese food off my hands for me. I hate cats, and it would definitly be absolutly no loss at all if someone were to steal one while I was there. Id wave and wish him a happy voyage.
__________________
Bushmaster Superlight AR-15 5.56mm / Custom 24" Heavy BBL Varmint AR-15 5.56mm / Ruger M77 .257 Roberts / Ruger MKI 22LR Pistol / EAA Witness 9mm Pistol / Daisy 2202 22LR / Remington Viper 522 22LR / Stevens 200 .223 / Savage 10FP 24" .308 / Mauser 98 Sporter 30-06 |
January 9, 2006, 09:07 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 7, 2005
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
I'm also a displaced Texan, but we have a House there in San Antonio We'll be back one day!!!!! |
|
January 9, 2006, 11:54 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2004
Location: South West OHIO (boondocks)
Posts: 1,337
|
tanksoldier wrote:
Quote:
And citizens arrest is very far removed from shooting someone who you see commiting a crime. There are all sorts of circumstances that you can't forsee, and you open a huge can of worms for yourself if you go around acting like a LEO...or the punisher. If you feel so strongly about stopping crime, get yourself a real badge.........or a cape..... |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|