If it saves ONE life... - Page 3

TDL · February 27, 2013, 07:12 PM

If it saves one life:

We should strongly restrict the fourth amendment. What is this BS about "unreasonable searches and seizures." Cops are good guys. Why do they need a judge and a warrant to search a possible drug dealers house?

We should strongly restrict the fifth amendment. What is this stuff about due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination protecting criminals for? this lets out tens of thousand of criminals to reap mayhem on the country.

We should strongly restrict the sixth amendment. Seriously you have nothing to fear from the government. Why do we need Trial by jury speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel. Why do murderers get this stuff? haven't enough children died?!?
why is that cruel and unusual since they may go onto kill someone?

We should strongly restrict the first amendment
Why allow people read Steven king novels about violent school vengeance fantasies being acted out?
How can Django be legal?

IE we can save HUNDREDS of thousands of lives by simply shredding the bill of rights. It was written it the days of muskets by a bunch of long dead guys. We have the internet now and "freedom of the press" was from the days of the hand printing press.

Who are these dangerous sick extremist groups like the ACLU defending criminals, pornographers and the speech rights of Nazis along with the video game industry? what is that about? After we get rid of the nuts hanging onto their "guns and bibles" we need to realize anyone sticking up for the first amendment must be "holding onto their internet and pr 0n."

alan · February 28, 2013, 11:52 AM

Like ""Do It For The Children"", ""If It Saves One Life"" is an equally ringing buzz phrase.Problem is that the Saving Of The One Life mentioned is nowhere documeted.

Additionally, in instances where gun control as usually presented, bans on one thing or another, registration, licensing, endless hoops for The Law Abiding to jump through, has been enacted, either legislatively or administratively, it just doesn't work, a plain fact that some seem unable/unwilling to grasp, one wonders why.

February 27, 2013, 07:12 PM	#51
TDL Senior Member Join Date: January 25, 2013 Posts: 317	If it saves one life: We should strongly restrict the fourth amendment. What is this BS about "unreasonable searches and seizures." Cops are good guys. Why do they need a judge and a warrant to search a possible drug dealers house? We should strongly restrict the fifth amendment. What is this stuff about due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination protecting criminals for? this lets out tens of thousand of criminals to reap mayhem on the country. We should strongly restrict the sixth amendment. Seriously you have nothing to fear from the government. Why do we need Trial by jury speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel. Why do murderers get this stuff? haven't enough children died?!? why is that cruel and unusual since they may go onto kill someone? We should strongly restrict the first amendment Why allow people read Steven king novels about violent school vengeance fantasies being acted out? How can Django be legal? IE we can save HUNDREDS of thousands of lives by simply shredding the bill of rights. It was written it the days of muskets by a bunch of long dead guys. We have the internet now and "freedom of the press" was from the days of the hand printing press. Who are these dangerous sick extremist groups like the ACLU defending criminals, pornographers and the speech rights of Nazis along with the video game industry? what is that about? After we get rid of the nuts hanging onto their "guns and bibles" we need to realize anyone sticking up for the first amendment must be "holding onto their internet and pr 0n."

February 28, 2013, 11:52 AM	#52
alan Senior Member Join Date: June 7, 1999 Posts: 3,847	Like ""Do It For The Children"", ""If It Saves One Life"" is an equally ringing buzz phrase.Problem is that the Saving Of The One Life mentioned is nowhere documeted. Additionally, in instances where gun control as usually presented, bans on one thing or another, registration, licensing, endless hoops for The Law Abiding to jump through, has been enacted, either legislatively or administratively, it just doesn't work, a plain fact that some seem unable/unwilling to grasp, one wonders why.