|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Do you carry a 1911? | |||
Yes, a Government Model | 81 | 30.68% | |
Yes, a Commander Model | 62 | 23.48% | |
Yes, an Officer Model | 27 | 10.23% | |
Yes, a Micro | 8 | 3.03% | |
Yes, in a caliber that's not .45ACP | 8 | 3.03% | |
No, (comment reason) | 63 | 23.86% | |
No, they're obsolete | 15 | 5.68% | |
Voters: 264. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 30, 2015, 06:19 AM | #101 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
In regard to the Army manual's manual of arms of applying the safety with the thumb of the right hand if two hands were not available, I also have doubts that, that was the designer's intention. I find that applying the safety with the thumb of the right hand is awkward and the original 1911 and 1911A1 military safeties are poorly designed as to encourage that. If that was intended, it seems that the projection on the safety would have been more ergonomically designed for an upward stroke of the thumb. As for the issue of carry condition (one, two, or three), to me it is abundantly obvious that peoples' fear of condition one is a matter of perception rather than reality in that there are several/many guns (.22 Ruger autos, etc.), that are routinely carried in condition one and not having a visible indication of being cocked and locked due to no external hammer, causes no consternation whatsoever...out of sight, out of mind. I have two Colt Combat (steel frames) Commanders, one in .45 ACP and the other in .38 Super. Although I like to shoot them, at my age they are too heavy and bulky for concealed carry in my estimation...I pocket carry (Bianchi pocket holster), a S&W 36. Circa 70's .38 Super XSE Commander .45 ACP Last edited by dahermit; May 30, 2015 at 06:57 AM. |
|
May 30, 2015, 06:48 AM | #102 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Mine full sized, all steel TRP is still my winter go to gun. With a proper holster and belt, it's a joy to carry and with winter clothing, a snap to conceal.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
May 30, 2015, 07:35 AM | #103 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Location: Northeastern US
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Cosmodragoon; May 30, 2015 at 07:40 AM. |
||
May 30, 2015, 08:31 AM | #104 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
|
Quote:
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 Quote:
|
||
May 30, 2015, 08:33 AM | #105 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
I disagree. It was meant to be chambered with the hammer back and the safety on.
|
May 30, 2015, 09:05 AM | #106 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
|
Quote:
Cocked and Locked carry didn't come into vogue for another ~50 years
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 Quote:
|
||
May 30, 2015, 09:08 AM | #107 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
May 30, 2015, 09:14 AM | #108 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 1,836
|
Quote:
We're all aware that the 1911 pistol was intended to be carried with the hammer down on a live round, that JMB didn't have a thumb safety in the original design, and that it was added at the request of the Army so that soldiers on horseback could engage the safety while riding since it was deemed too difficult/unsafe to lower the hammer on a live round while riding. As far as the design of the original thumb safety, if I were to hazard a guess, I'd say that it was made with the stubby platform so that it would not get in the way of the shooters thumb, which would have spent far more time cocking and decking the pistol than engaging and disengaging the safety in the early days. If we refer back to the text provided, the idea wasn't that it would see the constant use that thumb safeties do today with the majority of 1911 aficionado's carrying them in cocked and locked. Rather, it was something that would be used occasionally under specific circumstances while, the majority of the time, the gun would be carried hammer down on a live round. I wonder how much of a concern the ergonomics of the thumb safety were at the time, considering it was, literally, an afterthought.
__________________
"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge or jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - LtCol Jeff Cooper |
|
May 30, 2015, 09:18 AM | #109 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2015, 09:26 AM | #110 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2015, 09:37 AM | #111 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2015, 10:52 AM | #112 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2015
Posts: 267
|
My philosophy on carry is to carry what you shoot the best that you are willing to have on your hip all day long.
I shoot my 1911 better than any other handgun I've shot. I do carry it now and then, always cocked and locked in a proper holster that protects the safety. The weight is the only issue for me. I like how slender it is and the length doesn't bother me. On days I don't feel like lugging a big chunk of steel around on my hip, I now have a sig p938 which is very easy to conceal and I am very satisfied with how it shoots. I love the single action triggers on these pistols. |
May 30, 2015, 11:15 AM | #113 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
|
Quote:
It's kind of hard to read as it is computer translated but about 1/2 way down he explains all the functions of the hammer, thumb safety and grip safety. I'll also not he specifically notes that the hammer if pulled back past full cock is designed to trip the grip safety allowing to decock the pistol one handed.
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 Quote:
Last edited by mavracer; May 30, 2015 at 11:22 AM. |
||
May 30, 2015, 09:40 PM | #114 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2006
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,484
|
Nope. Have seen too many have problems. Also I hate "cocked and locked". The last thing I want to do if pulling my pistol is disengage a safety. Give me an HK DA/SA please.
__________________
"The only purpose for a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have laid down." "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them." -John Wayne |
May 30, 2015, 11:04 PM | #115 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Posts: 1,903
|
I carried 1911s for a long time. I was trained on 1911s in the military and liked the feel of the pistol. In 2000 I made a change. I purchased my first HK USP45 compact. Since then I've carried HKs almost exclusively when wanting a 45ACP pistol. My current carry pistol is the HK45C. The ability to carry DA/SA with one in the chamber, or cocked and locked as I did with my 1911s works for me. Out of the box the trigger is better, the action smoother and the overall construction is superior IMHO. It is also a lighter weapon. I have kept two 1911s in the safe, but they are no longer on my belt.
|
May 30, 2015, 11:12 PM | #116 |
Member
Join Date: May 22, 2015
Posts: 36
|
I like to carry my 1911's in the winter when I'm able to wear a jacket. It is very comforting having a 1911 on your hip
|
May 30, 2015, 11:18 PM | #117 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,041
|
I was surprised by this poll . I wouldn't have thought that the Govt. would have such a lead .
I really like the Govt. , but prefer to carry a 4" with a Officer grip . |
May 31, 2015, 07:08 AM | #118 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I actually was surprised too. Everyone I know that carries a 1911 (usually older people with some younger ones in there) carry a commander at most. I mainly see them carry these officer or micro models. |
|||
May 31, 2015, 07:45 AM | #119 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 8, 2012
Location: NW Pennsylvania
Posts: 109
|
I'm a big guy so I can hide a full sized gov't well. Coogs.
|
May 31, 2015, 09:49 AM | #120 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2008
Location: Downeast Maine
Posts: 1,836
|
Personally, I like the 1911s thumb safety, I'm used to it and comfortable with it. I've never had an issue with one and disengaging it is just part of the draw.
I've always found it funny that for all the other things that people learn to do in this world without conscious thought, so many are concerned over the possibility of being stumped by a click of a switch on their pistol when the pressure is on. And yet, for all of those concerns, no one has any worries about operating the safeties on their ARs, PDWs, home defense shotguns, etc..
__________________
"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge or jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - LtCol Jeff Cooper |
June 1, 2015, 09:50 PM | #121 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Boston, People's Republic of MA
Posts: 1,616
|
I carry a sw1911 subcompact. It's my favorite EDC gun right now.
__________________
Proud to have served. |
June 1, 2015, 11:03 PM | #122 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2014
Posts: 329
|
No. There are production high capacity handguns in whatever caliber I want that exceed the ergonomics, capacity, durability, reliability, weight, etc. of the 1911. Beyond the non-hinged trigger, there really isn't anything going for the 1911 that another handgun can't do better, and for less assache and money spent.
Finally, for any carrying a handgun with the likelihood of its use, this is a moot point: policy often dictates what is carried. Past that, it's a coffee table book you wear on your hip. I find the debate about the intended vs. designed use of the 1911 hilarious and academic. See above re: policy. I know a guy that has a Model T that can make 35 mph, so I guess it is a great around-the-town car. Ya know, for groceries. This dead horse is hilarious. |
June 1, 2015, 11:52 PM | #123 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Definitely the 1911 in some form is pretty omnipresent.
|
June 2, 2015, 07:23 PM | #124 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2006
Posts: 402
|
I have went full circle, pretty much, and I always end up coming back to the Lightweight commander. It's my favorite carry gun, and short of a pocket .380 or something, I find it as easy to carry and easier then most other choices, unless I drop down in stopping power and effectiveness.
As far as I am concerned all development of personal side arms for self defense could have stopped with the Lightweight Commander. |
June 2, 2015, 07:31 PM | #125 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
I carry a lightweight commander when I'm feeling like carrying a 1911. Which isn't often. The Smith and Wesson is a scandium framed, titanium firing pin, beast.
|
|
|