|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 15, 2013, 02:54 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,350
|
Quote:
__________________
Go Pokes! Go Rams! |
|
March 15, 2013, 02:59 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Stuart, VA
Posts: 2,473
|
Quote:
To answer ops question, I don't there is a reasonable answer. Besides, the only true "free state" would be a state that has a high enough degree of RKBA to affectively oppose tyranny. Not sure that can be calculated, but I'm sure it would be inversely proportional to the Brady state scorecard.
__________________
Liberty and freedom often offends those who understand neither. Last edited by noelf2; March 15, 2013 at 03:08 PM. |
|
March 15, 2013, 03:05 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
|
Quote:
To be honest, it's tough to come up with an appropriate name for those states that accurately describes what they're doing, but at the same time isn't going to turn someone off to our cause. Un-constitutional is close...but it implies that everything that state does goes against the Constitution, which just isn't the case. Maybe we should just make up a brand new word, and define it as the states that wish to restrict 2nd Amendment rights. I vote for, Caljeryork states. |
|
March 15, 2013, 10:05 PM | #29 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
I wonder if we really need the divisiveness that's implicit in such labels.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
March 16, 2013, 12:24 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
|
|
March 16, 2013, 07:16 AM | #31 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
How about just "gun friendly"?
|
March 16, 2013, 02:16 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 17, 2006
Posts: 261
|
Or, "2nd Friendly" or "2nd Amendment Friendly"?
|
March 16, 2013, 04:03 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
2A friendly is good for me, but then there are certain degrees of 2A friendly. I mean permit required, no permit, open carry, no open carry, etc.
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
March 16, 2013, 09:09 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2009
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 2,710
|
Vanya wrote:
Quote:
|
|
March 16, 2013, 11:03 PM | #35 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Mike, that's one of the reasons why the invective rule is in place.
Demonizing the place where you live is counter-productive to real activism. Demonizing the places where others live is downright divisive. Neither one helps our cause. Fact is, in the eyes of the anti-gunners, it merely gives them more fuel to stereotype us, yet again. |
March 16, 2013, 11:15 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,824
|
I do find it amusing that Maryland "the Free State" http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual...nickname.html]
has some of the most restrictive gun laws.
__________________
Chief stall mucker and grain chef Country don't mean dumb. Steven King. The Stand Last edited by egor20; March 16, 2013 at 11:57 PM. |
March 16, 2013, 11:53 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
|
|
March 17, 2013, 02:26 AM | #38 | |
Member
Join Date: September 24, 2012
Location: Nowhere in particular
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
And to the original poster, I'd say something along the lines of secession but I don't want homeland security doing somersault action rolls into my bushes . So I'll just go with "Milton Friedman Friendly Zones." |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|