April 19, 2012, 11:37 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
|
MIM vs Investment Casting
With all the controversy involving MIM and the widespread belief that it produces inferior parts, I wonder why many manufacturers don't stick to investment casting as pioneered by Ruger?
|
April 19, 2012, 11:51 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
The main reason is that MIM parts (which are not inferior) are good to go as they come out of the mould. Investment castings still have to be machined, hardened and finished. But Ruger still makes many of its small parts by machining from the solid, so I wouldn't be surprised to see MIM parts in Rugers before long.
Investment casting, however, can be used for parts that undergo major stress, like receivers and bolts. So far, MIM has not been used for such parts. Jim |
April 20, 2012, 12:49 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
MIM parts 'good to go' as they come from the mold ???
Metal powder is mixed with a polymer [wax] and that is injection molded .Then it is heated to drive off the polymer then heated [sintered] to bond the powder. It may be then heat treated , carburized machined , etc. Lots of variables especially shrinkage . Ruger has an investment casting company Pine Tree Castings that makes the parts. In any case where MIM can be used to copy existing parts , efficient and economical investment casting is done by designing things from scratch. Good engineering involves engineering of the whole process not just part of it.
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
April 20, 2012, 01:00 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
|
Quote:
|
|
April 20, 2012, 05:27 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 18, 2010
Location: In a Van down by the River
Posts: 181
|
GIGO
like the computer saying, [garbage in garbage out]. I had a 1911 hammer that looked like it was mushed together from leftovers. The Half cock notch crumbled like a lead sinker.
I used to sell carbide inserts, they are sintered from a powder just like MIM parts. When an insert has been out in the weather and chilled, like in my trunk, it can shatter like a chicklet if you try to run cold. I wonder if that can happen with a MIM part?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Liberate America... Free the Republic -NRA Life Member- |
April 21, 2012, 07:53 PM | #6 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
If the shrinkage of MIM is calculated and taken into account, it doesn't matter. As for machining, I have seen a fair number of MIM parts, and read about the process and the major advantage is that they don't require machining and show no sign of it.
The most intricate parts can be made by MIM without machining, an example being the S&W trigger. Investment casting can produce a solid part (e.g., a rifle bolt), but finish machining is needed to hollow it out, machine the threads, cut the bolt face, and so on. It is cheaper than forging, and less metal needs to be removed, but its main advantage is that investment casting can be done about anywhere (say, a shopping center factory), where forging requires large drop hammers that have to be solidly grounded and would shake a normal building apart. Jim |
April 24, 2012, 07:32 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
I think part of the "investment casting makes better parts" stories is that, as cast pieces need rework, there's an inherent quality control in cast pieces. Any obvious defect will likely be caught during post machining, while in MIM the parts drop into the bin and no one takes a second look at them.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
April 24, 2012, 09:01 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,747
|
But then, we have the D&D Bren Ten. Awesome guns but the investment castings and final machining left a lot to be desired.
There are always exceptions to the "rules".
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor “Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life......” President John F. Kennedy |
April 24, 2012, 05:04 PM | #9 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
It is not something Ruger brags about, but they do "fix" castings that have air holes or flaws, using welding as necessary. Of course they choose which parts they repair so there are no safety concerns, and the customer never knows the difference.
As to casting giving a better chance at quality control, the forged and machined parts used on the older guns "dropped into bins" as well, and were only spot checked before being hardened and sent to the assembly area. In factory production, it has been almost two centuries since machinists in greasy bib overalls made parts by machining steel stock a thousandth of an inch at a time and measuring the result with calipers. Jim Last edited by James K; April 24, 2012 at 05:18 PM. |
April 24, 2012, 05:09 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Most of the Bren Ten was made of farmed out parts not in house manufacture. That creates a big quality problem. The gun was mostly hype with promises of many guns which they couldn't fill even a fraction of ! It was said that only those on "Miami Vice" had the necessary magazines !!
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
April 24, 2012, 05:20 PM | #11 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
So fictional cops shot fictional crooks using fictional guns loaded with fictional magazines.
Jim |
April 26, 2012, 07:13 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Vice, Miami; Sonny's main sidearm...
A detailed article in Soldier of Fortune in the mid-1980s shed a lot of insight into the weapons & SFX of NBC's hit cop series: Miami Vice.
Det Sgt James "Sonny" Crockett used a 10mm Bren 10 from D&D in the first few episodes but when the company had problems, the show producers moved to the S&W 645 .45acp. In the TV show pilot(a series first episode), Crockett used a SIG P220 .45acp(imported by Browning in the 1970s-1980s). The Bren 10 was considered new & experimental by many US police agencies in the early 1980s. For more details see; www.imfdb.org . ClydeFrog |
April 26, 2012, 10:43 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 827
|
The only thing I remember about that is that Sonny's weapon (a 1911) was a plot point during some multi-episode fiasco that had him kidnapped.
He was identified by his stance ("military style") and his weapon ("a Colt .45"), neither of which were accurate. I'd hate to argue with such an august opponent as Soldier of Fortune Magazine, of course... (Are they still around? Really?)
__________________
"Huh?" --Jammer Six, 1998 |
April 27, 2012, 02:03 AM | #14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 285
|
Quote:
I guess saying that the gun was mostly "hype" can mean many things to many people. That said, later guns which were assembled correctly were excellent. Quality on early guns, for a variety of reasons, was all over the place. While everything was outsourced, almost all machining, assembly and fitting was done in house. And, keep in mind, that all outsourced components except the original dual caliber magazines were made in the USA. The magazines were from MEC-GAR in Italy. What killed the original Bren Ten was not a lack of magazines (another piece of common knowledge). It was the fact that the company was grossly under-capitalized from the get go. This gun was one of the first that made extensive use of small parts manufactured using either MIM or investment casting methods and these did in fact work well. It was the slides and original magazines which caused the vast majority of the headaches. Quote:
Bruce |
||
April 27, 2012, 02:11 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 285
|
..
Last edited by BruceM; April 27, 2012 at 02:17 AM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|