The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Competition Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 1, 2010, 11:38 AM   #1
Field
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 295
anyone shoot both G17 and G34?

does the g34 actually feel much different than the g17 while shooting? I mean its just the g34 has part of the front/top of the slide cut out simply to reduce weight on the gun and its not going to effect how you feel recoil with the gun. if its just a sight radius thing maybe i should just get the 17 because im going to get sights and trigger for it anyways. ? just wondering

same thing i was wondering about the G22/G35 like with uspsa/idpa am i going to gimp myself at all by getting the 22 instead of the 35 for competition

i was thinking about getting both
__________________
iPSC=A66009
iDPA=A38321

http://www.youtube.com/user/FieldBoy111
Field is offline  
Old June 2, 2010, 03:33 AM   #2
Field
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 295
hey just wondering
__________________
iPSC=A66009
iDPA=A38321

http://www.youtube.com/user/FieldBoy111
Field is offline  
Old June 2, 2010, 04:10 AM   #3
dukeofurl
Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2004
Posts: 28
The reason for the cut is that if you add that much more steel to the slide you can start impacting the reliability, as the Glock 17 was engineered to operate with a slide weight of X plus or minus margin of error.

I've got a 19 and a 34 and I do well with both but the benefit is that extra sight radius that helps everyone else out. Besides that it is remarkably similar.
dukeofurl is offline  
Old June 2, 2010, 03:16 PM   #4
Field
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 295
Quote:
Glock 17 was engineered to operate with a slide weight of X plus or minus margin of error.
i dont get this. if they thought the slide was too heavy then they would reduce the recoil spring rate or do something different with the guide rod and how the slide moves. an XD tactical has a big heavy steel slide and IT doesnt have a big hole chopped in the top. i know they are different guns but you see what i mean
__________________
iPSC=A66009
iDPA=A38321

http://www.youtube.com/user/FieldBoy111
Field is offline  
Old June 2, 2010, 07:11 PM   #5
clemmac
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2008
Location: Free State Wyoming
Posts: 2
The slides weigh almost the same. The G-17 is about 17 ounces and the G-34 is right at 18 ounces. These weights are from a kitchen scale, don't tell spouse that I used her cooking scale to weigh Glock slides
clemmac is offline  
Old June 3, 2010, 02:12 AM   #6
reaper715
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 8, 2006
Location: north georgia
Posts: 129
I have both the 34 and 17. Love them both but you could not pry my 34 from my cold dead fingers. I know the slide is not that much longer but there is just something about it. I feel a slight less recoil out of the 34. The slide cut out is also handy if you get an aftermarket ported barrel. I plan on getting the barrel with both porting and a compensator. I use the 34 for IPSC and Action Pistol / 3 Gun.
reaper715 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08001 seconds with 8 queries