The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 12, 2015, 06:40 PM   #1
mwells72774
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
Working on a jap type 38

Wanting to get it drilled and tapped and the bolt bent but the smiths here local won't touch the project. When I ask further they say that the jap rifles are too hard on their equipment. Are the actions that strong?
mwells72774 is offline  
Old March 12, 2015, 09:14 PM   #2
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Arisaka actions are very strong. But probably the main reason is that they are hard, as well. Hard enough that I would use carbide drills on it. Your smith may not have carbide drills. Or he may not be set up to cut metric threads, or he cannot forge the bolt or weld on a bolt handle, or whatever. Arisakas do not really lend themselves well to being the foundation for custom rifles due to the safety knob and lack of replacement triggers.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services

Last edited by Scorch; March 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM.
Scorch is offline  
Old March 12, 2015, 10:49 PM   #3
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,816
He just didn't want to do it, that's all. It is not that difficult to drill. Arisaka is not a good candidate for mounting a scope if you want to use the safety. Why the hassle?

-TL
tangolima is offline  
Old March 13, 2015, 08:27 PM   #4
wachtelhund1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: pelican lake, WI
Posts: 413
I also believe your gunsmith just did not want to take the project on. What are your plans for the rifle? A nice sporterized rifle or just shooter? Do your own drilling and tapping for scope bases, it is no big deal. If you're half way mechanical and have access to a drill press you can do it yourself. They have jigs for drilling and tapping bolt action rifles, but they are expensive. Watch a couple of You Tube videos and make your own jig. Midway has a good video for drilling and tapping a Mauser action. I think Midway also gas videos on bolt bending. Drill bits and taps can be ordered from Midway. Find a piece of round stock steel which will fit in the receiver and a piece of flat stock 3/16 or 1/4" steel. Mark a center line on both, drill both and tap the round stock so you can put the round stock in the receiver and bolt the flat stock to the top of the action with two bolts going though the receiver opening into the round stock. Center the flat stock on top of the action and bolt the two together tight, mark the position for the bases on the center line on the flat stock. Remove the jig and position bases on center line and mark the holes on the flat stock. Drill pilot holes with a drill press into the flat stock. Now you have your jig. Re-assemble the jig on the receiver, tighten it well and drill the scope base holes. Then tap. I have a very nice sporterized T-38. It was drilled and tapped for scope bases and the bolt was bent when I got it, but it was too short to work comfortably with a scope, so I welded a chunk of steel to the end of the bolt, ground and shaped it. I even checker the stock my self.
wachtelhund1 is offline  
Old March 13, 2015, 08:37 PM   #5
mwells72774
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
Wanting to make a nice hunting rifle.

Ive kinda got access to a machine shop but its intimidating for me. Ive got a basic understanding of drill press operations but its very basic. I might be able to work it. Are the videos on midways website?

I'll keep it in the 6.5x50 for a while since I snagged 119pcs of brass for $20
mwells72774 is offline  
Old March 13, 2015, 10:08 PM   #6
wachtelhund1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: pelican lake, WI
Posts: 413
Here is a post on how to bend the bolt handle: http://www272.pair.com/stevewag/bb/bb.html

And Midway video on drilling and tapping scope bases: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-_eglLgUXg
wachtelhund1 is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 10:11 AM   #7
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I think the "Guy" did not want to do it either. The receiver steel is easily drilled (About 38RC) but you have to use a sharp tap and be careful with it. Just turn the tap about 1/2 to one turn before backing up. This will "Break" the chips and stop the tap from becoming "Chip bound". Do not use what is referred to as a "Gun tap". Use a "Bottoming tap". Gun taps are for through holes and will break because the chips will come out like wire and the tap will jam when you try to back up. The safety on an Arisaka is probably the only military bolt action that makes scope mounting allowable with no safety modifications. I don't count the Carcano because scope mounting is generally on the side. I have used scoped Arisakas to hunt with for years mainly because they can be lightened up and the safety is extremely fast to manipulate when you get used to it.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 10:15 AM   #8
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
I have at least 3 receivers, while digging I will come across one of them, look at it and then remember why there is nothing about it that impresses me. I read the Japanese rifle was the strongest rifle in the world and that is always followed by something Ackely did or said. AND? I always say, forget the rifle, I want the cases. Then there is that story about this guy??that ran a 30/06 chamber reamer in to the 6.5mm50 chamber etc.. And I always say "Think about that and how impossible that would be", and we know that never works because the story about "THIS GUY" STARTS CHANGING AND MODIFICATION TO THE STORY follow".

Everyone with a Japanease receiver pick it up and make observations, feel free to post. I have 3 with 2 rifles, I have applied the leaver policy to them, I leaver the way I founder.

Deductive reasoning, if the receiver is the strongest in the world I should be able to chamber one to 8mm Remington mag.

F. Guffey

Last edited by F. Guffey; March 16, 2015 at 08:21 AM.
F. Guffey is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 11:12 AM   #9
mwells72774
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
If it was full military then I wouldnt touch it but its been shortened and put in a sporter stock. Sadly it still has the mum
mwells72774 is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 08:43 PM   #10
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I got this Type 38 nicely sporterized with a Springfield barrel in 300 Sav for $45 at a pawn shop ~ 15 years ago.

I drilled and tapped it, and reamed it out to 308.

It is just like working on an early Mauser.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Type 38 Arisaka 308 3-14-2015.jpg (58.2 KB, 1385 views)
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 09:59 PM   #11
mwells72774
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
I'm quite jealous
mwells72774 is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 11:03 PM   #12
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
That is a type 99. I had one that had the barrel set back and was reamed to .300 Savage. At 100 yards it was really accurate. I don't know about farther, I never tried it past 100 on a range. I have seen others at Gun shows and flea markets, so it must have been a popular conversion.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 11:55 PM   #13
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Here is my "Go to" mountain rifle. It is a T-99 action with a 7x57 barrel surplus Mauser barrel. The stock is T-38. All the hardware and anything else I could, is made out of 7075 aluminum or titainium. Some of the baked on finish is wearing off the aluminum and titanium, but it has seen some rough hunting seasons. I had a 6MM REM that was the same at one time.




Can't get photobucket to work on this forum?

Last edited by Gunplummer; March 15, 2015 at 12:22 AM.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 02:03 AM   #14
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
Quote:
Gunplummer
That is a type 99.
You forced me, Mr. Magoo, to put on his glasses are read DeHaas.
I am now correcting my spread sheet and the tags on the Arisakas around here.
I have (4) Arisakas:
1999 $100 Type 38 6.5
2000 $45 type 99 sporterized 308Win drilled and tapped [shown in pic above]
2002 $60 type 99 sporterized 300Sav Redfield peep
2011 $100 type 99 6.5
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 09:00 AM   #15
mwells72774
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
Clark, you cant tease us like that. Its like inviting us all to a topless bar and they are all dressed...

Have any pictures? Im trying to decide how i want to bend the bolt. Snagged a harbor freight drill press last night, so I can D&T
mwells72774 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 09:53 AM   #16
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
Pictures are easy, distinguishing a type 99 from 38 was hard.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 12:54 PM   #17
wachtelhund1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: pelican lake, WI
Posts: 413
Here is my Arisaka posted again, 6.5X57 Mauser. The original safety is intact and I still use it sometimes, not an issue even with the scope. However, I replaced the trigger with a Timmy trigger which has a side safety. A friend borrowed this gun this last deer season and dropped a Northern Wisconsin 11 point buck in its tracks with one shot.

I fired formed my brass from 7X57mm. It wears a Nitrex TR-1 scope and cheap Midway Adams & Bennett barrel (probably Green Mountain). It shoots sub-MOA groups with Hornady InterLock Bullets 264 Caliber, 6.5mm 129 Grain Spire Point bullets at 2,900 fps. For me it is a very nice sporter.

wachtelhund1 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 03:15 PM   #18
mwells72774
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
What are the thread patterns? If i decide to rebarrel I think I want to go 260 for ease of components.

Made a Awesome deal. Uncle with machine shop said he'd drill and tap for a couple hundred cast projectiles. For his 30-30.
mwells72774 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 04:25 PM   #19
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Here we go again. Lets see if it picks it up this time. I don't like using attachments but I can not seem to get photobucket to work. This is the 7x57 I was talking about.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 001.JPG (52.8 KB, 91 views)
File Type: jpg 003.JPG (188.0 KB, 83 views)
File Type: jpg 004.JPG (76.1 KB, 75 views)
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 06:10 PM   #20
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Thread pitch on a T-38 barrel shank is 1.75 MM. You may have feed problems with a .260. Most Arisakas do not adapt well to feed .308 based cartridges. Here is my 6.5 "Thumper" that I re-cut to 6.5x55 and use 160 Gr RN bullets. It is an ugly gun, but it knocked a lot of deer over already. The other rifle is a 6.5 carbine I picked up years ago. I had a long eye relief scope on it for a while. Looking at the stock, I would say someone had a long winter somewhere.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 6.5 and thumper 001.JPG (36.6 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg 6.5 and thumper 003.JPG (81.4 KB, 79 views)

Last edited by Gunplummer; March 15, 2015 at 06:34 PM.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 10:39 PM   #21
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
"Pictures are easy, distinguishing a type 99 from 38 was hard."

I found an easy way; if it says 38 Type it is a 38 Type. If it says 99 Type, that is what it is.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 16, 2015, 09:21 AM   #22
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
Late war 99's only had the blow hole and MUM on the receiver ring. I have never seen a 99 with the twin blow holes like a T-38, and the ejector box frame on a T-38 is actually part of the receiver. That is the quickest way to ID them.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 16, 2015, 11:32 AM   #23
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I see the double blow hole on the 38 and the single on the 99.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old March 16, 2015, 03:53 PM   #24
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
As I said, I test the Japanese rifle by covering the receiver with a white towel. If after firing I find two black stains on the towel I chamber it to 257 Roberts/6.5mm50.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old March 16, 2015, 08:21 PM   #25
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The 30 Type also has two gas escape ports. But the receiver says 30 Type. And it has a hook safety.

Jim
James K is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06791 seconds with 9 queries