|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 10, 2013, 12:38 PM | #201 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
I've heard the jury was instructed to reserve manslaughter as a possibility, so I was under the impression that the charge could be commuted.
If not, then it'll most likely be flat acquittal, as I really don't see Murder 2 happening.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
July 10, 2013, 12:41 PM | #202 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Tom, how could the jury receive instructions prior to rebuttal/summations?
In any case, I was wrong - Zimmerman was charged under the "depraved mind" clause of Murder 2, making manslaughter a lesser included offense. Here is the entirety of Florida's murder statute: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/...s/0782.04.html |
July 10, 2013, 12:48 PM | #203 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 01:18 PM | #204 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
That said, none of us are mindreaders and only the attorneys and judge have any personal information about these particular jurors, so there's no way to tell. There are plenty of examples where jurors, in subsequent interviews, revealed that their verdicts were based on any number of emotional factors extraneous to the facts of the case and the law. Sometimes they just want to send "us" some sort of message. |
|
July 10, 2013, 01:36 PM | #205 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Laws on paper, I'm versed in. Trial procedures? I don't know much beyond throwing myself at the mercy of the court when I get a speeding ticket.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 10, 2013, 01:44 PM | #206 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
I have seen several discussions in which it was mentioned that juries sometimes feel the prosecution has not made its case for the primary charge, but the jurors feel that there was some degree of wrongdoing by the defendant, so they return a guilty verdict on a lesser charge.
The "lesser included charges" are very scary in Zimmerman's case because most of them would involve some type of felony that involved use of a firearm, triggering Florida's special minimum sentencing provisions. As this article notes, the results could be very strange: Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 01:44 PM | #207 |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
If I heard correctly, on of the jurors said she did not believe that killing is justifiable, even in self defense. Unless she acts differently, that means either a conviction on some charge or a hung jury.
|
July 10, 2013, 01:48 PM | #208 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
But I ask how this could have become public information. Was voir dire conducted in open court? |
|
July 10, 2013, 01:49 PM | #209 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
July 10, 2013, 01:53 PM | #210 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
From the latest scholarly review on juries (Devine, 2012):
1. Larger juries may spend slightly more time in deliberation - but a small effect. 2. Larger are slightly more likely to hang but again a small effect 3. Jury size doesn't seem to influence verdict. The author has a caveat that the base of studies is small so the functional equivalency (which the Supreme Court discussed) still needs investigation. Take away - we can't tell in this case if the jury size will mean anything. Sidebar - the author reviews that women are more likely to convict in sex crimes with kids. Whether that indicates anything here - dunno. I know the author is working on an up to date review of gender effects.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 10, 2013, 01:53 PM | #211 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
1) Pretrial hearing 2) Opening arguments (assuming judge finds adequate evidence to support indictment in pretrial) 3) Prosecution presents its case 4) Defense (generally) files for dismissal (rarely granted) 5) Defense presents its case (the phase we're in now, though I understand defense is going to rest today without Zimmerman testifying) 6) Prosecution rebuttal witnesses (if any) 7) Closing arguments/summations 8) Determination of jury instructions (including whether lesser included charges will be part of the instructions) 9) Jury deliberations/verdict 10) If verdict is guilty, defense may move to set aside verdict (VERY unlikely to be granted in this particular case) 11) Sentencing/determination of bond continuance (if guilty) 12) Appeals (if guilty) |
|
July 10, 2013, 02:15 PM | #212 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
I've thought all along that the judge has been heavily biased (reversibly so) toward the prosecution in this case, but this takes the cake:
Quote:
How could these texts not be admissible? They're exculpatory to the defendant, relevant, there's no question of provenance, and directly speak to the state of mind of the decedant. I see no possible way the judge can legitimately throw them out. |
|
July 10, 2013, 02:21 PM | #213 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
She's probably throwing them out on the basis that Zimmerman would not have known about them, and so can't use them to build a defense of reasonable fear.
On the other hand, such evidence could be introduced if it could show a pattern of behavior consistent with behavior the defendant described as having taken place. Not sure the judge is technically incorrect in this instance. |
July 10, 2013, 02:21 PM | #214 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Mind. Blown.
They're on a recess now. I think the last one. Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 02:27 PM | #215 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
To clarify, as I understand it from self defense classes and study, here is an example:
I have studied martial arts for a couple decades, and am actually pretty skilled. Some knucklehead and I get in a fight, and he shoots me. His defense is that I was such a dangerous opponent, he was automatically in fear of great bodily harm. However, he only knows about my training after the event, from research done by the police and/or his defense team. At the time of the event, I was dressed normally, and just looked like a history teacher or similar, in reasonably good shape. (40s, 6ft, 195, nothing spectacular nor terrifying.) He CAN'T use my level of training to establish his reasonable fear, because at the time of the event he didn't know about it. Now, he could possibly work around this, if for example he were an MMA fan, and recognized some move, throw, lock, or hold I put on him, and realized it were actually done well. He would have to establish that he could, in fact, recognize that technique, and my relative proficiency at it, and then he could very well introduce my background. Or, if I had a habit of beating up knuckleheads, his defense team might establish that the actions he described me as taking matched a pattern of past actual, documented behavior. |
July 10, 2013, 02:29 PM | #216 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 02:31 PM | #217 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
The defense would have to show that fights with his peer group at school were akin to attacking a total stranger; it might or might not work.
|
July 10, 2013, 02:33 PM | #218 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 02:36 PM | #219 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
On the bright side for Zimmerman, that could be yet another potentially reversible error should he be convicted of anything.
|
July 10, 2013, 02:41 PM | #220 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 03:55 PM | #221 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
|
|
July 10, 2013, 04:07 PM | #222 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
I can't imagine that information such as this would NOT be admissible. |
|
July 10, 2013, 04:16 PM | #223 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Found an online article with the transcripts of Martin's text messages:
http://www.actionnewsjax.com/content...kCC6gWjdg.cspx Here's one I find of particular interest: http://www.actionnewsjax.com/media/l...ion_report.pdf |
July 10, 2013, 04:23 PM | #224 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2013
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 182
|
I could be mistaken, but I thought the issue with the text messages was they could not be "authenticated". Meaning they could not prove the Martin sent them and he is not around to verify if he wrote them or not. I have provided my phone to others to send text messages, so I guess I understand the ruling.
It could be I just did not understand the judges position. Also, the judge has ruled in favor of the defense on a couple of issues, most recently they allowed the testimony of a defense witness to remain even though he was in the court during the testimony of other witnesses. She also did not allow the state to use the gym owner as a rebuttal witness after the state discovered he had some information about Zimmerman on his website. |
July 10, 2013, 04:27 PM | #225 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
By that standard, phone records could never be introduced as evidence.
|
|
|