|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 29, 2010, 09:03 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2008
Location: milton, wv
Posts: 3,640
|
Quote:
__________________
Desert Eagle Alliance Group Launcher Extraordinaire ______ ----Get Busy Live'n.....Or....Get Busy Die'n......Red -------They call me Dr. Bob,,,, I have a PhD in S&W |
|
July 30, 2010, 10:20 AM | #27 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
If there is one part of the article I wish LEOs would read, remember, and take to heart, it would be this:
Quote:
|
|
August 1, 2010, 11:36 AM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2006
Location: In The Heart Of The Buckeye Nation
Posts: 558
|
Quote:
__________________
(\__/) "I would rather be your friend, but if you are (='.'=) not interested in that, I am prepared to be (")_(") a capable and efficient enemy." - Jeff Cooper |
|
August 1, 2010, 04:34 PM | #29 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WildtheseecampfitssonicelyAlaska TM ©2002-2010 |
|
August 3, 2010, 01:58 AM | #30 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
Quote:
The article was very broad, read: many generalities, and could easily have been titled, "Intro to Spotting a Concealed Carry 101". And the parting "shot": Quote:
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
|||
August 3, 2010, 08:06 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
I thought it was a good article. And, I see nothing wrong with stereotyping - I find that most "stereotypes" have a large degree of accuracy - not 100%, but better than 60%.
Just one question: What is a "blade stance" - as mentioned in the article? |
August 3, 2010, 08:08 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 22, 2009
Location: Ohio.
Posts: 634
|
Quote:
I mean, look at the title of the article. "Dealing with citizens legally carrying a concealed weapon." Why do you need to deal with them? They're carrying legally. Rrrgh.
__________________
"The CZ75 is made of win and longcats."--anonymous youtube comment |
|
August 3, 2010, 09:35 AM | #33 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2009
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
Might be a typo or regional difference; but assuming the former (serious question), a bladed stance is one that isn't square to the target, with weak side shoulder forward, firearm generally close to the body. It has benefits and drawbacks depending on the scenerio and whether the shooter is wearing body armor. Quote:
I don't believe the officer intended to imply that citizens who legally carry need to be "dealt" with. Perhaps it wasn't the best choice of words. Being somebody who is an avid supporter of carry laws, you may read it that way which puts a spin on his article, so just be careful there. For what it's worth, I read it that way the first time too, and then asked "is that what he really meant, or was it just how I read the word?" I think he simply meant how officers should deal with the reality of citizens who carry legally, and respecting them, understanding their mentality, and not creating a situation where there isn't one by treating them like somebody who is carrying illegally, just because they have a gun. |
||
|
|