|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 5, 2010, 11:04 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 19, 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 1,162
|
Glock 20(sf) in 10mm.
|
January 5, 2010, 01:05 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
|
I'd chose the 44 Mag (and did). Who said overkill on smaller threats is bad? There are loads for the 44 Mag that go from 500-1200 ft/lbs @ the muzzle. I think that covers just about anything. Not to mention handloads. You can get a ported barrel as well if need be. You had also mentioned the possibility of being in grizzly country. The 44 Mag is marginal. The other 3 choices aren't much of a choice. Shotshells can be had or made as well. Speer sells empty shotshell cases. And then there is the 41 Mag....
|
January 5, 2010, 04:00 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: December 7, 2008
Posts: 15
|
I dont have any issues running 200g flat point ammo through my Nighthawk 10mm. Most (ok, maybe half) 10mm bullets are flat nose (truncated cone) anyhow. If my tight 1911 chamber will feed them the a glock certainly will if thats what you want.
I'd go with the glock 20SF. If you want a little better comfort carrying get a 4" 1911 with bobtail. Personally I would stick to the 4.5-5" barrels to get the most velocity possible. I purchased my 10mm for exactly the same reasons. Although I might pick up a 20SF myself for woods carry. The Nighthawk is just too nice to bang around. |
January 5, 2010, 05:01 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2009
Posts: 109
|
Thanks for all the advice.
The 10mm is the winner for my purposes. On top of higher capacity, the Glock finish is very durable, even more-so than stainless steel. I haven't looked at many revolvers, but I've yet to find one with sights that I like as much as the Glock sights. Still, I think I'll look at and maybe shoot a .44Mag before I make my purchase, but I'm still pretty sold on a 10mm Glock. |
January 5, 2010, 05:33 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 351
|
Well, since you have made up your mind, it is really more in your mind than not. I used a 44 Mag while living in Alaska and still would. I really think your possible episodes with a black bear will be non=existant.
|
January 6, 2010, 08:38 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2009
Posts: 230
|
+1 for the 10mm.
|
January 6, 2010, 11:21 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2009
Posts: 1,003
|
I'm 6'2" and 210 pounds. Compare the black bear -- they ain't all small!
Sure, some black bears are small, but some are like that guy 450-500#. |
January 7, 2010, 09:32 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: gulf of mexico
Posts: 2,716
|
my uncles last black bear was 240lbs, it was as tall as a 9yr old girl.
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." |
January 7, 2010, 11:34 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2005
Location: USA The Great State of California
Posts: 2,090
|
Weight is important to me when I go into the outback. So, I carry a light weight .44 magnum, the S&W 329PD. I can mix the ammunition any which way I like ... usually the 1st round is a shot shell, the next two are Buffalo Bore Heavy .44 Special Hollow Points, followed by two .44 magnum Jacketed Soft Points and the 6th is a heavy Hard Cast Flat Nose load, such as 305 grain Buffalo Bore.
__________________
Hook686 When the number of people in institutions reaches 51%, we change sides. |
January 7, 2010, 12:32 PM | #35 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 15, 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 964
|
The G20 has such awful handling characteristics for me that I chose the 4" DA .357 Magnum as a woods sidearm. I have never yet needed one round, let alone sixteen. I am looking to "move up" to a six inch barrel for its greater sight radius though.
The revolver, being able to use down loaded .38 Special "squirrel rounds," as well as the curbstompers from the top of the ballistics tables, is a more versatile platform. Revolvers can be field braced against trees without seriously impairing their ability to fire follow up shots. They can be fired with precision from a single action mode. Revolvers can feature factory standard adjustable sights for different loads, they are easier to scope, and the grip is alterable without permanent modifications to the weapon too. Revolvers of the requisite caliber are better suited to the role of woods gun than are autos. Autos excel in the self-defense role in the sticks, but they are readily outshone at hunting by a decent revolver. |
January 7, 2010, 01:36 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
|
"but if you need a gun to deal with a snake, you're not being creative enough."
So tell, Oh Wise One, would a custom machete/scimitar work better for this task?
__________________
I think this country is screwed. |
January 7, 2010, 01:48 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 196
|
I've used a 10mm (Delta Elite) as a woods gun several times and would not hesitate to do so again. I have nothing against the other calibers, but I just prefer the 10mm for my own use.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------- Moe Howard: "Fire at will!" Larry Fine: "Which one's Will?" |
January 7, 2010, 03:06 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
|
10mm in a Glock 29 is my go-to gun in the wilds of Michigan where black bear is the biggest predator you're liable to encounter, and cougar and lynx are seemingly even rarer. Until I got my G29, it was my old faithful Colt Delta Elite. I'm a firm believer in 10mm ever since the 80s. If I was ever to venture into Grizzly country though, even the .44 mag would be woefully inadequate to me, and I would be far more comfortable with my SAR-48 with several 20 round mags. Personally, I just don't think you can swat those creatures too hard, and I am in awe of the people that live there and contend with that possibility every day.
__________________
Stevie-Ray Join the NRA/ILA I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed. |
January 8, 2010, 01:45 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2008
Location: Wild, Wonderful West Virginia
Posts: 315
|
+1 10mm. Still don't understand the need to kill snakes.
__________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas Jefferson |
January 8, 2010, 02:20 AM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
|
Quote:
__________________
Jim March |
|
January 8, 2010, 02:34 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 396
|
Another vote for the Glock 20.
|
January 8, 2010, 10:51 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2005
Location: USA The Great State of California
Posts: 2,090
|
Jim March wrote:
Quote:
__________________
Hook686 When the number of people in institutions reaches 51%, we change sides. Last edited by Hook686; January 8, 2010 at 11:02 AM. |
|
January 8, 2010, 09:28 PM | #43 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,930
|
Hook686,
I think he's worried that the OTHER rounds fired first will cause the 305gr bullet to jump crimp. It sounds like you've done the testing to prove they won't, but if you haven't it's probably worth loading the gun as you describe, cranking off the first 5 rounds (leaving the hardcast in place but unfired), reloading the first 5 and shooting them again. If the hardcast rounds till hasn't jumped crimp after that then shoot it for practice and consider that load combination to be tested.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
January 9, 2010, 02:18 PM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: January 9, 2010
Posts: 19
|
Glock 20 with extended barrel and Double tap 200grain hardcast would seem to be good bear medicine.
|
January 10, 2010, 01:42 AM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2008
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
1) Severed snake heads can still bite and envenimate. It is a reflex action and does not require a live brain. You never want to generate a second victim in order to help the first one. 2) Bring a dead or half dead snake to an ED and they are going to freak. Seriously. I've been there when it happens. 3) At least in Northern Mexican, the US and Canada, there are really only two basic antivenins. Almost all bites are going to be crotalids (pit vipers). There is a polyvalent antivenin that covers all of these. For the extremely rare coral snake bite, the antivenin is rarely needed and almost impossible to get. So the decision is usually if a person will be treated and not with what antivenin. In rare cases where it is unclear, s few quick questions will differentiate. Most snakes in the US are not venomous anyway. 4) If you can shoot it with a gun, you can shoot it with a camera. The pictures are then easily sent to someone who can actually identify the snake. Few Emergency Physicians can reliably identify a snake. Once you mangle the head, many distinguishing features are lost. Then you need someone who can do it based on coloring. 5) There are plenty of snakes on the endangered species list. Taking out a harmless one for ID purposes, could have you trying to keep yourself out of club Fed. So, in short. Unless it is going to hurt you, don't shoot it. And don't shoot it, then bring it to the ED. |
|
January 10, 2010, 02:11 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 7, 2008
Location: Shelby, MT
Posts: 1,013
|
Quote:
I love the 10mm, especially in a 1911 style pistol, but if I was really concerned with "danger" in the wilderness I'd take the 44 mag. Not everyone can shoot a 44 well enough to stake their safety on it, though. |
|
January 10, 2010, 11:21 AM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,066
|
Don’t use pepper spray on bears; use salt & pepper spray. the bears have found that makes you much tastier.
For protection from any possible predator I recommend carrying what will handle all. What takes care of the biggest will also take care of the smallest. Recoil should not be the limiter for SD, you’re not going out there for target practice. |
November 27, 2012, 12:39 AM | #48 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2009
Posts: 1
|
Sorry to revive an old thread, but the 10mm just wont compare to the .357 mag as a bear defense round.
10mm 180 gr. 1287 fps .357 mag 180 gr. 1422 fps as per Hodgdon manual |
November 27, 2012, 04:47 AM | #49 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2012
Location: NV
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
Even the 155g 10mm at 1500 fps has close to the same energy although just slightly less. So what's your point? |
|
November 27, 2012, 01:44 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
jwfrazier,
I see it's your first post so welcome to the forum. It's just my opinion but I see that you revived an almost 3 year old thread, the topic of which is a fella trying to work out what caliber might be best for him for a backcountry gun which is a very common topic here, in order to give your opinion on which round is capable of generating more energy and velocity the 357 Magnum or the 10mm. In doing so you compel readers to relive the whole 3 year old discussion in order to get to your opinion on caliber ballistics. Looks like your opinion on this is a valuable one and it may have best been served by starting a new thread on this topic. Some old threads deserve to be kept alive, photo threads for example, others can be left in peace. Just my opinion though. tipoc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|