The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 10, 2010, 08:29 PM   #1
P99AS9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 612
.223 for hunting

I want the see what everyone at TFL thinks.
P99AS9 is offline  
Old January 10, 2010, 08:33 PM   #2
DiscoRacing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2008
Location: milton, wv
Posts: 3,640
I have two.... use my Ruger 77 all the time.. also have a 700VLSS.
DiscoRacing is offline  
Old January 10, 2010, 08:34 PM   #3
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 4,679
what'cha hunting with a .223?
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Old January 10, 2010, 08:38 PM   #4
DiscoRacing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2008
Location: milton, wv
Posts: 3,640
racoon, squirrel, ground hog
DiscoRacing is offline  
Old January 11, 2010, 07:47 AM   #5
10-96
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Tx Panhandle Territory
Posts: 4,159
Oh yeah- fire 'em up. That's what I use on little critters. If you live in a windy locale like I do- it ought to do ya well out to 350yds reliaby. Oooh, I guess I ought to qualify that. I only reload/shoot 55gr bullets with my old benchrest load and just don't try for much past 350. It's kinda slow, but stoopid accurate in both of my CZ's and very tolerable in my AR's.
__________________
Rednecks... Keeping the woods critter-free since March 2, 1836. (TX Independence Day)

I suspect a thing or two... because I've seen a thing or two.
10-96 is offline  
Old January 11, 2010, 09:30 AM   #6
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
From a practical standpoint, I generally figure that about the largest animal that I'll deliberately hunt with a .223 is a coyote. I prefer something with a bit more Oomph! to it for deer.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old January 15, 2010, 08:41 PM   #7
semi_problomatic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 27, 2009
Location: Ft. Polk
Posts: 883
Varmit shooting sure. Don't see the point with deer or larger.
__________________
Freedom's just a word. If I'm gonna die for a word, my word is jello...
semi_problomatic is offline  
Old January 15, 2010, 10:40 PM   #8
stinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2001
Location: west texas
Posts: 772
I think it is perfect for everything up to deer. For deer it is still a good choice if you know its/your limitations. Check your state regulations to know if it legal.
stinger is offline  
Old January 15, 2010, 11:09 PM   #9
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
I consider it adequate for anything up & including deer, if one makes a good shot with it. You'll pass shots with the .223, which you could take with confidence using a heavier caliber rifle.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 01:35 PM   #10
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
The limiting factor for using a 223 for deer is bullet construction. If you are using good bullets and picking your shots well, it would be adequate but not my first choice.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 01:50 PM   #11
James R. Burke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: U.P. of Mich/Quinnesec
Posts: 1,897
For everything up to a deer. Yes a deer can be taken with one perfect placement etc, but it would not be my choice. Great varmint type rifle. This is just myself on what I would use. I have a few differnt rifles so I can more closely match what I am hunting.
James R. Burke is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 02:02 PM   #12
223nut
Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 41
I have taken 2 doe mule deer with 62gr Federal Fusion ammo. Both shot were less then 100yrs and neither made a step. 223 will do the job with the right bullet and with YOU the hunter knowing YOUR limits to put the bullet where it needs to go. I would keep my shots not longer then 100yrds.
223nut is offline  
Old February 2, 2010, 10:19 PM   #13
turbotype87
Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2009
Posts: 99
.223

First of all i would like to say this question seems to come up alot. Here in Connecticut the minimum caliber for deer hunting is .243. Not to say a .223 can't take down a deer with the correct placement. I prefer to use a minimum of .30 caliber. It's funny how each state has there own laws pertaining to caliber size for deer hunting. I own a AR15 Stag model 4 in 5.56mm [.223]. I don't know if i would use it for deer hunting, mostly use it for target practice.
turbotype87 is offline  
Old February 2, 2010, 10:54 PM   #14
langenc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 1,551
This issue has been kicked around more than the ball will be Sunday in FL.

About 4 yrs age a gun mag had an atricle about it and it hasn't stopped since.

Nosler Partitions 60 gr.
langenc is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 12:59 AM   #15
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
This issue has been kicked around more than the ball will be Sunday in FL.

About 4 yrs age a gun mag had an atricle about it and it hasn't stopped since.
The arguments over .22 caliber hunting cartridges have been getting kicked around for more than 100 years. You're giving gun rags too much credit.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 10:11 AM   #16
PRONE2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 113
I use it for everytihing from deer and hogs on down Bang flop DEAD! That's just me thought to each there own.
PRONE2 is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 11:06 AM   #17
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Always remember that there is a bunch of difference in skill levels between those of us who are pretty much dedicated to acquiring a high level of skill in shooting and hunting--versus Mr. Average Guy who doesn't shoot a full box of ammo in a year and maybe gets a half-dozen days in the woods.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 02:55 PM   #18
rjrivero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,399
.223 for hunting

My 10 year old uses my .223 AR on HOGS. She's not quite quiet enough in the woods yet for deer, but stalking hogs and getting a good broadside view, she has yet to fail. Nosler Partition is a GOOD performer on these hogs. Last year she took a 300 lb sow, this year it was a bit smaller, 180lbs or so. Neither one walked after getting hit.

Note my daughter shoots every week in the NRA Jr. Rifle program. After starting this program this fall, she's already gotten her Pro Marksman, Marksman, Marksman first class, and Sharpshooter ranking. She's now working on her BARS for her designated marksmen certificate. (i.e. She's no slouch with a rifle)
rjrivero is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 02:59 PM   #19
JohnO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2000
Posts: 502
Art, That's an excellent point. I'm certain the DOW takes that into consideration when they determine what the min caliber should be for big game. I know a guy who routinely takes cow elk with his .243. He happens to be an excellent marksman.
JohnO is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 03:11 PM   #20
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
With good ammo it is fine for the small North Ga deer around here. A 100 lb dressed deer is larger than average and I've seen guys carrying 35 lb deer to the check station in 1 hand.

If hunting in areas with larger deer I feel I could still make it work with good shot placement, but would prefer at least a 243.
jmr40 is offline  
Old February 3, 2010, 06:33 PM   #21
James R. Burke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: U.P. of Mich/Quinnesec
Posts: 1,897
Anything up to a deer. It can still be used on a deer but lots of things become more critical, and the skill level like Art said is the big one. Thats just my thoughts, but I think this subject been beaten to death.
James R. Burke is offline  
Old February 7, 2010, 03:13 PM   #22
benroe
Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 52
my bro hunts deer with his 223 and does OK with it, but I like to use the 7.62x54R. I just like to know it is going to punch a big old hole through them.
benroe is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05757 seconds with 10 queries