|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 3, 2009, 12:53 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
found this website listing "lots" of load reciepes... anyone registered ???
http://www.loaddata.com
got suff from 17 Hornet to 500 S&W & all the odd stuff in between, including cast bullets for almost all calibers as well... I fond it interesting enough, that I paid the annual fee to get the powder charges for all the lists... your guys thoughts ???
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... Last edited by Magnum Wheel Man; March 3, 2009 at 02:40 PM. |
March 3, 2009, 01:05 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,258
|
My thoughts are that none of it is proven data. It is only what people have tried and said they like. Some people like to load crazy hot. I would rather stick with proven data from a manual of powder manufacture and just work up my own load.
Rusty
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded. |
March 3, 2009, 01:43 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2008
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,436
|
I joined AmmoGuide Interactive for the same reasons as you joined the other site, Magnum Wheel Man. I've found it to be informative with some interesting applications on the site. Having said that, all of the applications I use are available for free elsewhere on the internet, this site just happens to put them all in one place. It's probably worth the $17.95 per year I paid, but I wouldn't pay any more than that.
I fully agree with CrustyFN , be careful with the load data and always compare to published sources. I wouldn't recommend sites like these to a new loader until they have enough experience under their belt to know what is and isn't a reasonable load. |
March 3, 2009, 02:44 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
I've got a lot of odd calibers I load for... several new ( to me ) this year...
there is also most published load book data, as well as privately developed data... ...& alway approch any load data with caution & respect it is due... DR.STRANGE... thanks for the tip... I had some difficulty fixing that, please let me know if the revised link didn't fix that problem... & thanks again for bringing it to my attention...
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
March 3, 2009, 05:10 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 1,106
|
I use loaddata.com and I've found it well worth the yearly cost.
|
March 3, 2009, 06:23 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 19, 2008
Location: Sneads Ferry, Nc
Posts: 232
|
I have a subscription to LOADDATA make it easy to compare loads and wieghts.... Most of the data comes from published manuals, but I still cross reference it to current manuals.
had a subscription to ammoguide interactive but a lot of the user loads seemed a little hot..... but nothing beats a good libary of manuals
__________________
It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.... |
March 3, 2009, 06:58 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Posts: 299
|
Quote:
__________________
"Old School" ain't all bad... |
|
March 4, 2009, 12:16 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,258
|
Thanks DM I'll have to check it out.
Rusty
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded. |
March 4, 2009, 12:41 AM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,061
|
I subscribed for a year, but let it lapse. I already own half a dozen printed manuals and often cross-check the free data on the powder maker's sites. More often I now work by using those data sources to cross-validate initial results in QuickLOAD which I then go on to do tweaking with because it lets me adjust for the volume of my actual chambers. So as far as Loadswap went, I just didn't really need the additional data for the way I do load work-ups now. I think that's really the point. How you work determines which kinds of resources you need, and you'll need to work that out for yourself.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
March 4, 2009, 01:34 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 17, 2009
Posts: 1,089
|
http://www.stevespages.com/page8a.htm...his pages are full of possible charge weights....
|
|
|