April 5, 2023, 05:40 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,525
|
Accurate Arms 2495
I picked up a 1# container of AA 2495 for 65 and 75gn bullets in 223 Remington for AR. 16" bbl, 1:7 twist - it's technically a 5.56 upper receiver.
I was wondering if anyone has had any experience using this stuff; and if they had anything to share about their experience. Sierra 65gn SBT #1695; and Hornady 75gn BTHP #2279. I plan on using CCI 450 primers to start. #41's later in the work up.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
April 5, 2023, 06:07 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 30, 2017
Location: Columbia Basin Washington
Posts: 415
|
I used it in a 45-70 for 300gr and 405gr loads.
It worked well for me, but I never used it in a modern rifle caliber. |
April 6, 2023, 03:41 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,602
|
A2495 is designed for 7.62x51, made in Canada by General Dynamics. It is an extruded powder. I had a pound, but it got recalled. I found I can achieve higher velocities with Accurate 2460, which is a ball powder, in 223/5.56, which I highly recommend. With those heavier bullets Accurate 2520 is called for. I have a pound, but have not loaded it yet with the 65 gr. SBT (which I bought it for).
I will say I like the Accurate Ball powders. They seem to have a definite edge on the extruded stick powders from Accurate in terms of velocity. They also flow extremely well in volumetric measures.
__________________
............ |
April 6, 2023, 04:47 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,546
|
I tried to like A2520 for its good metering, but unfortunately, about any extruded powder gave better accuracy in my rifles - two guns, three barrels.
|
|
|