The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 4, 2013, 09:52 AM   #1
zincwarrior
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
ACLU against pending background check legislation in the Senate

ACLU now voicing similar concerns to gun owners:

http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/04/ex...vil-liberties/

Last edited by Al Norris; April 4, 2013 at 10:01 AM. Reason: corrected link
zincwarrior is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 10:02 AM   #2
Al Norris
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
I had heard, but not seen confirmation of this. Thanks for the link (which I just corrected, as it led to page 3).
Al Norris is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 10:28 AM   #3
JimDandy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
Yeah, I'm pretty fond of this link. Already tweeting it- When @ACLU and the @NRA don't like a BG Check bill, it's time to write a better one.
JimDandy is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 10:30 AM   #4
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Chris Calabrese is the ACLU's litigator for privacy issues. His concern is potential misuse of personal information.

It's not a striking about-face from them on the RKBA, but I'll take the help. Their opposition carries real weight in the legislature.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 10:50 AM   #5
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
Without looking it up -busy - the NRA and ACLU have cooperated on similar issues in the past.

Just remember that the ex-PM of Australia is doing the talk show circuit saying that is good Australia doesn't have a BOR. That's a good thing as it keeps the courts from protecting civil rights according to that genius.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 07:47 PM   #6
KyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
Quote:
Just remember that the ex-PM of Australia is doing the talk show circuit saying that is good Australia doesn't have a BOR. That's a good thing as it keeps the courts from protecting civil rights according to that genius.
A bill of rights is but the first step in maintaining liberty. My recollection is that the former U.S.S.R. had some outstanding civil rights protections in their constitution --- which meant exactly nothing. What good is the right to vote if there is only one candidate? A bill of rights must be actively protected and advanced if it is to remain in effect.
KyJim is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05978 seconds with 10 queries