|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 16, 2013, 05:47 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Frustration with the Kansas City Star
Some of you probably read the email exchanges I had with Barb Shelly (opinion writer) and Derek Donovan (public editor) at the Kansas City Star.
They never did get back to me, with regard to my offer to let them shoot an Evil Black Rifle, a shotgun, and some handguns on my property. Nor has Ms Shelly responded to any subsequent emails. She has, however, posted several anti-gun OP-ED pieces in the interim. She had a heyday comparing Oscar Pistorius to Jovan Belcher, just the other day. So, I submitted the following letter to the editor, and I am very curious as to whether it will ever see the light of day: Quote:
|
|
February 16, 2013, 06:46 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
The problem is that they are not obliged to publish your letter: they control what they put into the newspaper and what they don't.
So it is most unlikely that they will publish something they don't have a good answer for given that they clearly lean toward gun legislation. Seems to me that if one is pro-gun and publish in a pro-gun paper/magazine then it's preaching to the converted and so it's really a waste of time. If one is pro-gun and try to publish in a pro-gun control paper/magazine then you'll rarely get any exposure, and so it's really a waste of time. I can't help but feel that independent channels such as the internet or unedited channels such as live phone-ins are the best way to at least get one's message across to all to at least hear and then hopefully consider those views. Never say never, but as you speculated, I think it unlikely that this will get published.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
February 16, 2013, 08:33 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Pond, I suspect the same.
I was discussing this issue with a friend, earlier today. He feels that the far left and the far right are represented by today's columnists, but that an independent centrist editorial writer could probably find a large market. So, I am going to look into starting up a site, or trying to break into the syndication racket. I am extremely frustrated with the state of our modern media. |
February 16, 2013, 08:39 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
Quote:
|
|
February 16, 2013, 05:28 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: April 6, 2012
Posts: 97
|
There is an old saying in the newspaper business, "Freedom of the press belongs to those who own the press."
As previous posters have stated, a newspaper has no obligation to publish opinions contrary to those of its editorial writer(s). Many will, in the interest of fairness, to present more than one point of view to their readers, or just to create an illusion of openness. You may not get a letter opposing a published editorial printed, but if you don't send it you certainly will not. I have no idea what the newspaper situation is in Kansas City (too lazy to do a search), whether there is any competition or alternative to the Star, but that might be an option to get the pro-2A word out to the public. Not as good as being on the same pages as the Star's anti-gun pieces, but a letter in the "KayCee Free Classified Shopper Sheet" beats heck out of silence, IMO. |
February 16, 2013, 05:40 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
Unfortunately, too many of the so-called news papers and magazines have become not much better than the supermarket tabloids (National Enquirer, etc.) I only read newspapers to get a basic gist of a story. Facts and fiction get too mixed.
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
February 17, 2013, 05:11 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Using Bloomberg numbers to argue with the Star
My dad found a Bloomberg article that - amazingly - took a balanced approach to the gun control debate. I used it to buttress a complaint to the editorial staff at the Star (who still have not responded, and probably never will):
Quote:
|
|
February 17, 2013, 07:17 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
With the Kansas Star I can imagine it would feel pretty great to get a response conceding that you indeed have a point, but I think you are flogging a dead horse.
Valiantly, but still futilely... Going back to your idea of your own site: I think the idea is good, but you'd need to design it in such a way that it does not become another site where the converted gather to read like-minded views, but rather something that will pique the interest of every end of the spectrum to get to those we want to convince... No easy task!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|