December 4, 2012, 07:58 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
Merwin Hulbert
Hi, I'm new here and new at reseaching guns. I have a Merwin Hulbert handgun that has been passed down through the family. It has .32 cal 7 shot on the side, under the cylinder. Just looking for some information and possible value on it. All help would be appreciated. Thank you.
|
December 4, 2012, 08:29 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Please post some good pictures as no one can do an evalutation without them. The gun sounds lilke the medium frame DA pocket revolver. Those were made to the M-H patents by Hopkins and Allen. The guns are unusual in the way they load and have good collector value if in good shape.
Jim |
December 4, 2012, 10:06 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
Hi Jim, I am by no means a photographer but hope these pics help.
|
December 4, 2012, 11:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
|
Um, it's a bit rough looking. It was made by Hopkins & Allen.
Depending on bore condition and function, I'd place it between $300 to $500. Probably closer to $300. Kind of a wide range but it really depends on the innards and whether it still functions. The grips are chipped, too. Definitely closer to $300 if lucky. Ones in un-fired to excellent condition will fetch between $700 to $900 if you find the right collector.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying Last edited by Onward Allusion; December 4, 2012 at 11:21 PM. |
December 5, 2012, 07:41 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
I collect guns of this era... I don't have one of these, but have several hopkins & allen guns ( along with all the others ) the folding hammer is a plus... not having the "skull cracker" grip frame a minus... the grips are pretty easy to find replacements... if the gun functions properly, & the nickel & grips are the only negitives, I'd say it would go $400.00 plus on the auction sites
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
December 5, 2012, 08:15 AM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thank you for your replies. I know it was fired sometime pre 1969 by my mom to scare off a drunk at the front door, lol. True story. Dad always kept it and 7 shots together in a drawer, emergency protection I guess. Located serial numbers and all 3 match. Really like the folding hammer, that's neat! I would guess that someone in history pryed the grips off and snapped each one in the process. Don't know a thing about "bore" or how to check it out. Date on hammer is Jan. 27, 85. would that be production date?
|
December 5, 2012, 08:26 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
that's likely just a patent date... ( funny how they just used 2 digits for the year in pre 1900 guns )
I have a Hopkins & Allen info book, that I think has the MH guns in it, the serial would be needed to tell you a date of manufacture
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
December 6, 2012, 08:07 AM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,381
|
"not having the "skull cracker" grip frame a minus."
I thought only the large frame revolvers had the skull crusher?
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. Last edited by Mike Irwin; December 6, 2012 at 10:21 AM. |
December 6, 2012, 08:36 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
I think you're probably right... don't remember if I've seen the small frame in the books like that or not... just know the "skull cracker" grip frame guns command a much higher price than the ones with "normal" grips
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
December 6, 2012, 09:25 AM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
What in the world is a "skull cracker" grip? Not that it really matters, obviously, just curios.
|
December 6, 2012, 09:37 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
an extension of the grip frame ( purpose was for pistol whipping someone )
pics here... http://www.ocyoung.com/Merwin2.htm BTW... MIKE... I think they have a small frame pictured with the Skull Cracker... oops... sorry, spoke too soon... no pics of the small frame after I went back & looked more guns on page one in the link, but still no small frame, just shorter barrels
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... Last edited by Magnum Wheel Man; December 6, 2012 at 09:42 AM. |
December 6, 2012, 09:47 AM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thank you for the info and the link. Interesting!! I may take mine to my local gun shop and have them look it over for me. Don't really have a use for it so may sell it. We'll see.
|
December 6, 2012, 10:00 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
keep me in mind, if you decide to sell... just an FYI... we could check the serial & see if it's pre 1898 ( I don't remember off the top of my head )( then it's an antique, & could ship right to the buyer ) if it's newer, & you sell it ( non face to face ) where you would have to ship it, it'll have to go to a local FFL for the buyer to pick up...
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
December 6, 2012, 10:18 AM | #14 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,381
|
Well, the primary purpose was, as it was on the "military" revolvers, to provide a lanyard attachment point.
ETA: OK, apparently the company referred to it as the skull cracker. I thought that was something that was added later by popular usage. Other M&H revolvers had lanyard rings on a flat butt. I don't believe military Colt 1873s or Smith & Wesson Schofields had lanyard attachments, which is odd, given that many went to cavalry, but it was a common feature on military handguns of the time. The 1911 destined for cavalry use had a lanyard loop on the mainspring housing and on the magazine. As for whether it's pre-1898 or not, I believe that M&H went belly up in 1896, and Hopkins and Allen ceased production of revolvers at that point, so all M&H revolvers should be antiques from a legal standpoint.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. Last edited by Mike Irwin; December 6, 2012 at 10:23 AM. |
December 6, 2012, 10:31 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,536
|
Flayderman gives all the M&H revolvers as "made ca 1880s".
The M&H association says in production through about 1991, on sale through 1894, so it is most likely an antique. Flayderman lists a "birds head" butt .38 pocket, but the .32 was apparently made only with square butt. The folding hammer adds a bit of interest and value. |
December 6, 2012, 10:58 AM | #16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
Serial # 281xx. There's also a 4 digit # under left grip. If a revolver came factory with a lanyard ring, wouldn't there be evidence of some sort on butt of grip?
|
December 6, 2012, 11:35 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
that size ( small frame ) didn't typically come with a lanyard ring, they were pocket guns... the larger frames ( side or chest holster guns ) often had lanyard rings if used with horse mounted soldiers, or Navy men also often used a lanyard
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
December 7, 2012, 02:12 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
|
Vicki, if you sell it to a gun shop, be aware that you will. only receive about 50 to 60 percent of the value. The gun shop has to pay rent, pay it's employees, pay the insurance, feed momma and the kiddies and so forth, that gun might set in a display case for a year with out moving. Your best bet is through a private sale. In the rough shape your firearm is in, the value would be under a hundred dollars ( being old, does not automatically mean gold ), it would probably be more value as a heirloom than any monetary value. JMHO
__________________
Ron James |
December 8, 2012, 10:09 AM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 7
|
Thanks RJay, but you don't know a complete story. I live in a very small, remote area where everyone knows everyone. Right now my situation with being caregiver for my father forbids me from being away from home much, and the internet is really my own way of getting information until my relief comes. In other words, this was just a starting point. As far as our local gun shop, well I grew up with these people and I know they will give absolute top dollar. Not all places are this lucky I realize, but we have some advantages here.
|
December 8, 2012, 11:55 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|
December 8, 2012, 12:31 PM | #21 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As far as these guns having a lanyard, per Flaydermans, only the early large frame SA and DA Merwins (44 cal) had a traditional lanyard. As others have said, the gun of this thread would not have had a lanyard. It was not intended to be a main sidearm where a lanyard could prove useful (horseback riding). The OP is correct that if the gun had a lanyard but was later removed, it would have a plug fill most likely in the butt. It would be a shame if this gun had a metal plug in the butt, because that modification would almost surely be non-factory. Its also not really a "minus" in the way that the broken grips or finish wear is, but rather the skull crusher is a PLUS. Here is my Merwin. Its a 38 medium frame spur trigger version with flat/square butt. Below it are two period S&Ws, a 38 SA first model "baby Russian" and a 38 SA 2nd model below. In the photo below that, despite their similiarities in the first photo, we see how different they really are. The S&W had a better mechanism but the Merwin was quicker than many other designs of the period.
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|||
December 10, 2012, 09:01 PM | #22 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
The folding hammer spur was an option with the Hopkins and Allen revolvers as well. (H&A made the M&H revolvers.)
Jim |
|
|