The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 1, 2009, 09:44 PM   #1
buffalo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 103
Washington State Shooting Question

I might be moving to Wash State in the next month or two for work and wanted to know how much acreage do you need to own to be able to shoot on your own property?. My wife and i will be buying a house in the next 6 months if we move and want to make sure we have enough land to make it legal. Thank's alot if anyone knows.
buffalo is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 11:10 PM   #2
NavyLT
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
There are no state limitations specified. I don't know if different counties have any specific limitations or not. Counties may not regulate possession or carrying of firearms, but they can regulate the discharge of firearms. It would be at the county level that any limitation would be, if one existed.

The biggest requirement is an adequate backstop to prevent any bullets from leaving your property.
NavyLT is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 11:40 PM   #3
bshnt2015
Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2008
Location: CA & WA
Posts: 22
this is good to know, thanks.
bshnt2015 is offline  
Old November 3, 2009, 09:58 PM   #4
ADIDAS69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 381
bshnt2015

If you want to shoot on your own property aside from county regulations, you then have to look at city regulations. If you are anywhere inside King County i can Guarantee you that you will never be allowed to shoot on your own property. I am a member of The Interlake Sportsman's Association our members are regularly involved in trying to get more gun ranges open and keep the ones in existence open as well. Each day it is harder to do, mostly because annexation laws have been recently turned from a vote of those people on county land being annexed to an "asked and answered" policy that allows counties to annex properties they no longer want to take care of to be automatically annexed into any city that wants them.

If you let me know which county you are headed to i will see what info i can dig up.
ADIDAS69 is offline  
Old November 4, 2009, 04:43 AM   #5
Powderman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,166
Good posts above.

The main thing is to ensure that you don't have people living close enough to you to complain about it. You'll also want to live out in the unincorporated area of whatever county it is.

IMHO, the best area to buy a good piece of shooting property on is across the mountains to the east. I go with a friend on occasion who owns property in Kittitas County--we routinely shoot long range with no problems.
__________________
Hiding in plain sight...
Powderman is offline  
Old November 5, 2009, 12:27 AM   #6
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
As long as you're away from the I5 corridor and outside city limits you should be ok.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old November 5, 2009, 02:54 PM   #7
JuanCarlos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 22, 2006
Posts: 2,459
Quote:
As long as you're away from the I5 corridor and outside city limits you should be ok.
You may run into the odd county ordinance, though. For instance, apparently you can't shoot on the range I go to after certain hours due to some noise ordinance. Not particularly restrictive, just pointing out that sometimes being outside city limits isn't enough.
JuanCarlos is offline  
Old November 5, 2009, 03:20 PM   #8
RAnb
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 447
Depending on what you own, you may find WA to a less gun friendly than FL. Machine guns, SBS and SBR were made contraband in 1994. The only way to have them in WA was to prove they were registered by 1994 or earlier. Silencers are allowed, but use is a gross misdemeanor. WA is the only state that allows silencer possession and bans use. AOW's and DD's are allowed.

Ranb
RAnb is offline  
Old November 5, 2009, 09:33 PM   #9
buffalo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 103
Thank's for the replies guys,at the moment i am talking to a few different companies all in different counties so once i know where exactly i'll post up. One company is in King county but from the research i have done i will NOT be buying any property there. I don't have any suppressors so the very weird WA law about those won't affect me.
buffalo is offline  
Old November 5, 2009, 09:48 PM   #10
ADIDAS69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 381
side bar

Silencers are most easily obtained through a trust set up, though lately local law enforcement is requiring that the trust paperwork be notarized.

I live in Seattle and you would definitely be wise to steer clear, I catch crap from my neighbors for the size of my truck despite the fact the local transit refuses to stop by the lumber yards i need to go to. They also won't let me bring full sheets of plywood on the bus
ADIDAS69 is offline  
Old November 6, 2009, 12:25 AM   #11
RAnb
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 447
Quote:
Silencers are most easily obtained through a trust set up, though lately local law enforcement is requiring that the trust paperwork be notarized.
The local police require that trust paperwork be notarized? I have never heard of this before. Is there some law that allows the police to require NFA trusts to be notarized? I'm sure that the ATF will not recognize any trust that is not properly notarized, but the reason most people (including myself) get a trust is to ensure the police are never involved with our title 2 weapons collections.

Ranb
RAnb is offline  
Old November 6, 2009, 12:31 AM   #12
ADIDAS69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 381
I don't think its a matter of "law enforcement" being able to legally require the notarization i think it is an easy way for them to slow down anyone getting a silencer. To argue with them would take longer than just getting the notarization.
ADIDAS69 is offline  
Old November 6, 2009, 11:19 AM   #13
RAnb
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 447
But why do you involve the local police at all when using a trust? That is one of the reason for using a trust. You never have to tell them anything at all about your silencer collection. As far as I know, Seattle does not have any law requiring that a person notify the police when making or buying a silencer on a trust. There is no state or city law requiring me to do so in Belfair.

Do you actually tell the police that you are buying silencers on a trust when you are not required to?

Ranb
RAnb is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05478 seconds with 8 queries