|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Should penalties be levied for resurrecting old, inactive threads? | |||
Yes | 1 | 20.00% | |
No | 4 | 80.00% | |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 1, 2014, 12:43 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,273
|
Zombie threads
I keep seeing people commenting on threads that are years old, and just tonight one that was 13 years old. I know there is the little check box that tells people they are replying to an old thread, but it doesn't seem to stop anybody.
I propose a change to the rules of the forum, stipulating that commenting on a thread that qualifies as inactive (perhaps more than 1 year old) without adding new information should be subject to penalties ranging from an infraction to a 30 day suspension, at the mods discretion. I think adding penalties will help keep the clutter down and make the mods job easier. |
July 1, 2014, 08:15 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
The problem is that newbies start reading stuff (perhaps found on a search) and don't know what they are doing. The penealy wouldn't help. What we need is a forum software solution that required a certain action to deliberately post to an old thread.
For the "recently dead" threads, I'd like a pop-up that told the user he was responding to an old thread (and give the rules) and he'd have to click YES to continue. For "really dead" threads, I'd have them locked so that the responder would have to request a mod to unlock them in order to add something new. |
July 1, 2014, 08:59 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Quote:
As to whether the pop-up warning is effective -- things might be much worse without it. But we do appreciate it when members report necro-threads.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
|
July 1, 2014, 09:05 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
We're constantly telling people to use the search box before starting a new thread. And then when they do and reply to an old one, they get yelled at for that. What do you want?
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
July 1, 2014, 09:05 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 5, 2010
Location: West Coast...of WI
Posts: 1,663
|
It's a double edged sword. Some people complain when the same question is asked over and over. When a member uses the search function they may bring up an old thread and still need a bit of clarification after reading through it. So why not keep all the information under the same thread titile instead of starting a new one?
There have been times when I remedy a situation I asked about in an old thread that I started a while ago. I usually post how and what the fix was and thank those who gave advice or information. Hitting new members with infractions only discourages them from being active in discussions and leaving TFL.
__________________
NRA Life Member, SAF contributor. |
July 1, 2014, 09:37 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: April 6, 2014
Posts: 42
|
I am a moderator on a pipe smoking forum. There is an "Newbie, Ask The Old Farts" section. The rules are simple. Any question is allowed. OFs are not allowed to either give irrelevant answers or tell the newbie to use search. At least it might reduce the "clutter".
Personally, I am pleased so see some zombie threads revived. It tells me someone is searching for more information. And new members serve to keep the forum vital and refreshed. Just my 2 cents. |
July 1, 2014, 09:54 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
|
I will admit to being a little irritated a few times after reading a couple of pages and realizing the thread is from 2010. However, I’ve learned if a thread has multiple pages the first thing I do is check the date of the OP before reading very much. I may skip to the most recent post and see if it’s interesting if not I simply move on. Occasionally an old thread will be restarted with new information, but at the end of the day it’s up to each person to decide what’s interesting to them.
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
July 1, 2014, 10:34 AM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,955
|
Sorry, but we don't make changes to the board's policies based on polls. Though some may wish it to be, TFL isn't a democracy.
Is resurrecting an old thread really that big of a problem? As several here have stated, we sometimes chastise new members (and some old ones) when they don't do a search and ask an old, perhaps tiresome, question. Yet when they do the search, the odds are fairly good that the thread they find on the subject they are interested in is over a year old. There are several courses of action to take when you spot a "zombie" thread: a) Ignore it and move on. b) Post in it with any new information you may have for the member. c) Report it to the moderators so that it can be closed if the resurrecting post is of no value, and the thread should never have been brought back up. Please note that ridiculing the member in the thread is not one of the above choices. It never is a good choice for anything here. |
July 1, 2014, 12:02 PM | #9 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
The trouble is, any good solution requires that threads are able to be resurrected for good cause and not for poor cause. The only such solution requires that the person doing the resurrecting has a modicum of common sense. For all intents and purposes, someone who clicks a box that effectively says "I understand that this person asked about which rifle he should buy 14 years ago but I'd like to still offer an opinion." is not going to be dissuaded by another level of bureaucracy.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
July 1, 2014, 03:38 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Brian, that is the pop-up I'd use for a "recently dead" thread. Anything dead over a longer period of time (I'd vote for one year) would require a mod to unlock.
|
July 1, 2014, 04:17 PM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,955
|
The software does not allow for locking threads older than a predetermined length of time. It would have be done manually, and we aren't going to do that.
|
July 1, 2014, 05:43 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2014
Location: NE FL
Posts: 656
|
What is the problem with history?
Zombie threads seem like a non issue. Complaining about them seems to me like one is just looking for something to complain about. |
July 1, 2014, 07:39 PM | #13 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
It's not much worse than people bringing up the same suggestions over and over again in Site Questions, like auto-locking old threads.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
July 1, 2014, 11:36 PM | #14 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
From all appearances, it's just a me thing. My apologies to any who I may have unintentionally offended. Mods, feel free to close this. |
|||
July 2, 2014, 06:35 AM | #15 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
Truly, it's not that big of a problem.
Sometimes bringing a zombie thread back to life is appropriate, sometimes not. If you find a zombie post that should have stayed dead, simply click the Report Post button and go on your merry way. A member of staff will look at it and determine what needs to be done with it.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
|
|